ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Brain Imaging Methods
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1591169
This article is part of the Research TopicDiffusion-Weighted Imaging: Advances and Implementations in NeurologyView all 7 articles
Harmonization of diffusion MRI on healthy subjects using NeuroCombat and LongCombat: a B-Q MINDED Brain Intra-and Inter-Scanner Study
Provisionally accepted- 1imec Vision Lab, Faculty of Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- 2Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
- 3Icometrix (Belgium), Leuven, Belgium
- 4Siemens Healthcare NV/SA, Groot-Bijgaarden, Belgium
- 5µNEURO Research Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- 6Physiopharmacology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- 7MIRA, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The structural integrity of brain white matter is commonly assessed using quantitative diffusion metric maps derived from diffusion MRI (dMRI) data. However, in multi-site, multi-scanner studies, variability across and within scanners presents challenges in ensuring consistent and comparable diffusion evaluations. This study assesses the effectiveness of ComBat-based harmonization algorithms in reducing intra-and inter-scanner variability in diffusion metrics such as FA, MD, AD, RD, MK, AK, and RK. Utilizing the B-Q MINDED dataset, which includes anatomical and dMRI data from 38 healthy adults scanned twice on two 3T MRI scanners (Siemens Healthineers PrismaFit and Siemens Healthineers Skyra) on the same day, we evaluated the NeuroCombat and LongCombat algorithms for harmonizing diffusion metrics. These harmonization methods effectively minimized both intra-and inter-scanner variability, highlighting their potential to improve consistency in multiscanner diffusion analysis. Our findings suggest that NeuroCombat and LongCombat are recommended for harmonizing dMRI metric maps in clinical studies. Additionally, both algorithms applied in either ROI-based or voxel-wise configurations, significantly reduced variability, achieving levels comparable to scan-rescan variability intra-scanner. Nonetheless, the choice of harmonization algorithm and implementation should be tailored to the research question at hand. Moreover, the significant intra-and inter-subject variability on non-harmonized diffusion data demonstrated in this study reinforces the importance of harmonization strategies that address any sources of variability. By minimizing scanner-specific biases, the NeuroCombat and LongCombat harmonization algorithms enhance the reliability of diffusion biomarkers, enabling large-scale studies and more informed clinical decision-making in brain-related conditions.
Keywords: harmonization, diffusion MRI, brain MRI, B-Q Minded, intra-scanner, interscanner, normalization, combat
Received: 10 Mar 2025; Accepted: 12 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pinto, Anania, Paolella, Smekens, Billiet, Janssens, den Dekker, Sijbers, Guns and Van Dyck. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Maira Siqueira Pinto, imec Vision Lab, Faculty of Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.