ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Neurodegeneration
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disease Research: Focus on Innovative Human-Relevant Brain ResearchView all 11 articles
Enhanced Diagnostic Interpretation of the MoCA Using Machine Learning
Provisionally accepted- Département des Sciences neurologiques, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec City, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into clinical practice to optimize diagnosis in neurocognition. By capturing distinct cognitive signatures, this approach may offer a more precise alternative to the traditional interpretation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) which often relies on a fixed cutoff score (26/30). We aimed to evaluate whether machine learning models, by integrating detailed MoCA subtest scores, demographic variables, and cognitive chart-derived metrics, can improve the detection of cognitive impairment and classification of dementia subtypes. Methods: We analyzed 38,746 clinical observations (17,188 unique individuals) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center database. Five supervised learning algorithms, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), were trained using detailed MoCA subtest scores, demographic variables, and cognitive chart-derived metrics as predictors. To ensure generalizability of results and prevent data leakage, we applied a rigorous nested repeated grouped cross-validation strategy. Decision thresholds were optimized via the Youden Index on independent calibration sets, and model interpretability was ensured through SHAP value analysis. Results: Machine learning models consistently outperformed conventional approach. For the global detection of cognitive impairment, XGBoost achieved the best performance (Youden Index 0.61 vs. 0.54 for the standard cutoff). Regarding subtype classification, models demonstrated variable discriminative capacity depending on clinical homogeneity: primary progressive aphasia was best classified (Youden ≈ 0.77), followed by Lewy body dementia and Alzheimer's disease, while vascular dementia remained more challenging to isolate. Feature importance analysis highlighted the Cognitive Quotient (Bernier et al., 2023) as a robust universal predictor, while pinpointing disease-specific drivers such as delayed recall for Alzheimer's disease and verbal fluency for primary progressive aphasia. Conclusion: Our findings suggest interpretable machine learning enhances diagnostic utility of the MoCA, yielding superior accuracy compared to a fixed cutoff. By synthesizing individualized subtest profiles within a transparent framework, this approach offers a clinically actionable solution. It transforms the MoCA from a simple screening tool to a precision diagnostic aid, optimizing patient triage in the era of disease-modifying therapies.
Keywords: Alzheimer, artificial intelligence, Cognitive screening, machine learning, MOCA
Received: 04 Aug 2025; Accepted: 29 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Gourdeau, Gourdeau, Bernier and Laforce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Robert Laforce
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
