Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci.

Sec. Neural Technology

Classifying Motion States from Neural Activity of Non-Human Primates for Brain-Computer Interfaces

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • 2Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • 3Blackrock Neurotech, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • 4Department of Engineering Sciences, Jade Hochschule, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
  • 5Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
  • 6Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Many brain-computer interface (BCI) systems record neural activity from the sensorimotor network to drive the velocity of a mouse cursor, robotic limb, or other similar end effectors. These systems accurately translate neural activity corresponding to imagined or attempted movement into control signals for movement of an effector. However, without explicit mechanisms to recognize the intended absence of movement, decoders continue to receive nonzero inputs from the neural activity and thus infer nonzero effector displacement, even though the intended behavior of the BCI user is to maintain a constant effector state. This paper proposes a scheme to classify intended effector stationary states versus movement states directly from neural activity. In offline analysis with intracortical premotor and primary motor recordings from two non-human primates, mean classification accuracy was 0.936 and 0.930, respectively, while preserving decoded trajectory continuity. These results suggest that the proposed scheme provides a reliable and accurate means of distinguishing between stationary and movement states, offering potential benefits for stable and safe BCI control.

Keywords: Brain-computer interface, Correlation analysis, motion states, neural activity, offline analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Support vector machine

Received: 29 Sep 2025; Accepted: 28 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 XIAO, Kellis, Reiche and Solzbacher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: YICONG XIAO

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.