EDITORIAL article

Front. Neurosci.

Sec. Sleep and Circadian Rhythms

Editorial: Methods to Modulate Sleep with Neurotechnology, Devices, or Wearables

  • 1. Johns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States

  • 2. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, United States

  • 3. Johns Hopkins University Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, United States

  • 4. Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, United States

Article metrics

View details

221

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

electrical, magnetic, thermal, or ultrasound-based stimulation. This review also outlines persistent engineering challenges: the importance of precise timing of stimuli, refractory periods that limit the number of effective stimuli, and the need for individualized, state-aware calibration to prevent 7 . Their findings underscore the importance of scalable, generalizable machine-learning models for enabling wearable devices to monitor brain states with sufficient precision for neurostimulation. However, meta-analytic approaches highlight uncertainty across biofeedback studies, as illustrated by the systematic review and meta-analysis provided by, Recio-Rodriguez et al 12 .evaluating neurofeedback interventions for insomnia. Curiously, across randomized controlled trials, 'surface neurofeedback' (based on real time EEG data), showed an overall effect which favored improvements in sleep quality (PSQI scores) in control conditions over-active conditions, whereas insomnia symptom severity showed no significant change. This contribution is an important reminder that methodological rigor, including placebo controls and standardized protocol, remains essential. Recio-Rodriguez 12 This topic highlights a departure from devices that target one sensory channel (namely auditory stimulation) toward integrated multi-modal approaches such as skin-temperature feedback and tactile stimulation. Future work demonstrating a combination of approaches is warranted. Proprietary, 'black box' sleep devices limit scientific replication and slow innovation. The field must move toward open-source hardware, transparent stimulation algorithms, and modifiable realtime decoding pipelines that researchers can inspect, validate, and refine. Such openness enables reproducibility, accelerates methodological improvements, and supports interoperable systems that can drive genuine advances in sleep neurotechnology. Taken together, the studies presented in this Research Topic demonstrate how neurotechnology, wearable systems, and computational methods are reshaping both the scientific understanding of sleep and the practical tools available to treat sleep disturbances. By integrating physiological precision, user-centered design, and open scientific frameworks, these approaches hold substantial promise for advancing sleep health across diverse populations, when applied correctly.

Summary

Keywords

EEG, PSG (Polysomnography), Sleep, Sleep disturbance, wearables

Received

20 January 2026

Accepted

30 January 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Reid, Coon and Smith. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Matthew J Reid

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics