Abstract
The twenty-first century is seeing multiple and accelerating anthropogenic threats to the Ocean which jeopardize the planetary system and human well-being. Given the urgency of this planetary emergency, ensuring Ocean sustainability and an equitable and just future for humanity and the planet requires unprecedented acceleration and innovation in the theory and practice of marine governance. This Perspective provides an overview of recent trends and emerging issues facing the Ocean. It outlines a number of Grand Challenges, or important areas to advance for scholars and practitioners of marine governance, namely the bridging of sectors and scales, connecting people and the seas, consideration of inclusivity, equity and justice, and innovating knowledge generation and the interface of science, society and policy. This will allow to address questions of how to achieve just, equitable and sustainable use of and interaction with the Ocean in the twenty-first century.
1. Introduction
The world's Ocean1 forms an essential part of the planetary system, providing vital functions and ecosystem services that yield societal goods and benefits (Peterson and Lubchenco, 1997; Barbier, 2017). These include fundamental functions in oxygen production and buffering of the climate system, with an important role in heat and carbon dioxide uptake [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2022]. The world's main routes of transport and communication cross our oceans, one of the many uses of marine space and resources that include renewable energy (Weiss et al., 2018; Jouffray et al., 2020) and the provision of nutritious food and a source of income for billions of people (notably in artisanal and small-scale fisheries in coastal countries of the Global South; FAO et al., 2023). Not least, the Ocean has important roles in culture, recreation and identity (Martin et al., 2016), and overall provides vital support for human health and well-being (Fleming et al., 2019; Borja et al., 2020).
The perception of the Ocean as a vast and unbounded space, with limitless and practically inexhaustible resources, which prevailed in much of humanity's relationship with the seas (Huxley, 1883; Russ and Zeller, 2003), has slowly given way to the realization that ocean resources are finite, and that fishing has already dramatically altered marine ecosystems on a global scale (Jackson et al., 2001; McCauley et al., 2015). Similarly, while in the past the Ocean was regularly used to dispose of all sorts of pollutants and hazardous material, including ammunition and radioactive waste (Häder, 2021), there is a growing realization that this practice poses an increasing and global threat to human and more-than-human well-being. Recent local and international concerns about the plans to release millions of tons of contaminated water resulting from the accident at the Fukushima Dai'ichi nuclear power plant into the sea are a case in point (Mabon and Kawabe, 2022; Thakur, 2022). Excess nutrient loading (Smith et al., 2003) and changes in ocean chemistry and temperature as a result of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (Feely et al., 2004; Bronselaer and Zanna, 2020) further compound the issue, resulting in declining oxygen (Breitburg et al., 2018) and marine heatwaves (Smith et al., 2023) and exceeding safe and just planetary boundaries for the Ocean (Nash et al., 2017; Rockström et al., 2023). The realization is two-fold: first, that there are limits to the carrying and provisioning capacity of the Ocean, and second, that issues facing the ocean are often transnational in nature, transgressing political and administrative boundaries (Campbell et al., 2016).
Half of the world's population living in cities with >100,000 inhabitants resides < 100 km from the coast (Barragán and de Andrés, 2015). More than 10% of the global population and the majority (16 in 2011) of its megacities are located in the coastal zone, which comprises only 2% of the terrestrial area of coastal states but has a population density >5 times the global mean (Blackburn et al., 2013; Neumann et al., 2015). Coastal population growth and urbanization (Sekovski et al., 2012; Merkens et al., 2016) are further aggravating the pressures on coastal systems. Visions for a Blue Economy (Bennett et al., 2019), a rush for open ocean and deep sea resources (Jouffray et al., 2020; Levin et al., 2020), and interest in marine climate change mitigation strategies or ocean carbon capture (Lampitt et al., 2008; Gattuso et al., 2021), with recent emphasis on Blue Carbon (Macreadie et al., 2019) and marine Nature-based Solutions (Lecerf et al., 2021), place a new and strong focus on the Ocean and its resources. The human workforce is moving out to sea more than ever before in the history of humankind, and our footprint in the Ocean continues to grow, making the question of a sustainable future for human-Ocean relations increasingly urgent (Borja, 2023). With the ubiquitous human footprint characteristic of the Anthropocene, marine systems may be transforming into novel social-ecological systems with no historical analogs (Bulleri et al., 2020), posing particular challenges for management and the continued provision of vital services to society (Backstrom et al., 2018; Clement and Standish, 2018). Ensuring sustainability of the multitude of intersecting human activities in and uses of the Ocean (given unclear, overlapping or undefined jurisdictional boundaries) requires swift, agile and appropriate societal steering, or marine governance, which comprises “processes, coordination and collaboration with and throughout civil society,” emphasizes “knowledge sharing, learning, deliberation and communication,” and aims for “equity, justice and sustainability as desired outcomes” (Partelow et al., 2023, p. 2). It also requires global evidence-based Ocean governance to become both more inclusive (of non-Western, Indigenous, fishers' and other users' knowledge) and more democratic (the recent activities toward the establishment of an International Panel for Ocean Sustainability are an important development in this regard; see Gaill et al., 2022). This underlines the pressing issue of developing adequate approaches and addressing gaps in the theory and practice of marine governance (ranging from coastal waters to the high seas) to support sustainability of the Ocean in the twenty-first century. Below I briefly outline several areas for which advances in the theory and practice of marine governance seem particularly promising, salient and urgent, and which will be considered as priority in the “Marine Governance” section in Frontiers in Ocean Sustainability.
1.1. Bridging sectors and scales
Just as the roles of the Ocean for the planetary system, and for human societies in particular, are diverse and diversifying, so are the threats the Ocean, and humanity that relies on it, are facing—with biodiversity loss, pollution and anthropogenic climate change being the most pervasive [Worm et al., 2006; Landrigan et al., 2020; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2022]. Indeed, the current “triple planetary emergency” (UN Secretary-General, 2020) is acutely manifest in the Ocean. Yet, sectoral approaches are still common in Ocean governance—for example, some of the most-developed governance arrangements for areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) are regional fisheries organizations dedicated to the management of transnational fish stocks such as tuna. However, recognizing the interconnected nature of the diverse activities and impacts on the Ocean also requires innovative and more holistic governance approaches that achieve greater cross-sectoral integration (Stephenson et al., 2021), bridging climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development, and capitalizing on synergies (Knowlton et al., 2021; Pörtner et al., 2023). Developing tailored, people-centered management approaches that encompass wider societal goals rather than exclusively economic and sectoral targets is a key challenge and may require new institutional arrangements and economic systems, and overcoming prevailing terrestrial (and thus often territorial) biases. Forms of polycentric governance and adequate bridging between regional and global governance arrangements are two areas of attention in this regard (Gerhardinger et al., 2018; Mahon and Fanning, 2019; Adewumi, 2021; Gjerde and Yadav, 2021).
1.2. Connecting people and the seas
The year 2023 saw the landmark signing of an agreement under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in ABNJ, concluding nearly two decades of deliberations. This “UN High Seas Treaty” fills an important previous gap in Ocean governance, but many details remain yet to be resolved during the implementation of the treaty (Jarvis and Young, 2023; Mendenhall et al., 2023). Fulfilling the premise of governance as “societal steering” is made easier if there is an intimate relationship between society at large and the object of governance, which underlines an important feature of the Ocean: the majority (64%) of it is comprised of ABNJ, far from shore and beyond the reach of large parts of the human population. The issue is compounded by another feature of the Ocean—it is intransparent and practically uninhabitable to humans, with its habitats and denizens largely invisible and inaccessible to humans without technical assistance. Western views of the Ocean in particular portray it as vast, empty space, into which society may foray (mostly for economic purposes), but from which it is otherwise absent (Steinberg, 2001; Brum Bulanti et al., 2022). This paradigm still prevails in much of the use and management arrangements of the Ocean (Campbell et al., 2016), although images such as that of the “expanding margin” (Glavovic et al., 2015) which explicitly conceptualize marine spaces as social-ecological systems are now emerging. Advocacy for, and identification with, the plight of the Ocean to improve governance thus requires efforts in increasing and diversifying Ocean literacy (Dupont and Fauville, 2017; Schwerdtner Máñez et al., 2023), which is one of the priority areas of the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (Ryabinin et al., 2019). It also requires a “repopulating of the seascape” (Aswani et al., 2018), which can draw on examples such as Pacific Island cultures that have long-standing and intimate relationships with the Ocean, extending to the areas of high seas stretching between and connecting the various islands and their societies (McCormack and Mawyer, 2022). Marine social sciences and humanities will have to play a much more central role in marine sciences, where they currently are underrepresented (Partelow et al., 2018). This will not only yield a better understanding and visibility of the various ways humans are living with the Ocean, but also contribute to the necessary knowledge base on sustainability-supporting behavior and behavioral change (McKinley et al., 2020), including e.g., on perceptions (Breckwoldt et al., 2018) and on compliance with rules (Bergseth et al., 2023).
1.3. Inclusivity, equity, and justice
Due to the prevalent paradigm of oceans as “empty spaces,” there potentially is an even higher risk for people to be excluded than in terrestrial systems, where “fortress conservation” has long been a dominant approach, with disastrous results for people (in particular Indigenous communities) and frequently negative environmental outcomes (e.g., Singh and van Houtum, 2002). Indeed, some authors already perceive a paradigm shift from the treatment of Ocean resources as shared property of mankind to an exclusionary approach emphasizing restricted or altogether prevented access, further disenfranchising already marginalized communities (Cabral and Aliño, 2011; Wolff, 2015). This underlines that questions of environmental justice and equity, in multiple dimensions (e.g., resource access, gender) and across different scales [e.g., Global North and South, local communities vs. (trans-)national actors], are at the heart of sustainable Ocean governance (Bennett, 2022; Smallhorn-West et al., 2023; Spalding et al., 2023). A promising development is that some government agencies are developing frameworks to account for these aspects in their policies and plans (e.g., NOAA Fisheries, 2023). In general, governance arrangements that work with, rather than against, people are needed (Ferse et al., 2010; Ban and Frid, 2018). Noteworthy in this regard are efforts to acknowledge and support Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) in formal marine management (e.g., Estradivari et al., 2022), which hold particular promise for Indigenous and community-based governance (Gurney et al., 2021). At the same time, area-based conservation initiatives with highly unequal power relations, e.g., by private enterprises (Bush et al., 2017), require particular scrutiny to avoid “ocean grabbing” that leads to further exclusion and negative impacts on human well-being (Bennett et al., 2015). Importantly, questions of inclusivity and equity extend to the academic realm as well. Marine science for ocean sustainability is an international undertaking that connects researchers from the Global North and South (Crowder, 2022). Yet, the academic system is still skewed against non-English speaking researchers and those from the Global South (Amano et al., 2023; Talavera-Soza, 2023). Innovations of the way science is organized and assessed are needed to achieve a more inclusive and equitable system that better embraces the full diversity of human knowledge.
1.4. Innovating knowledge generation and the interface of science, society and policy
Working toward a sustainability transformation for the Ocean will require novel ways of science and knowledge generation, establishing a “marine citizenship” (Buchan et al., 2023) and paying specific attention to marginalized and Indigenous peoples and communities (Ban et al., 2018)—who are, incidentally, among the most vulnerable to anthropogenic climate change but contribute proportionally less to the carbon economy (Mason and Rigg, 2019). The recent Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework2 introduced new perspectives and options regarding the necessity to include Indigenous knowledge and citizen science in decision making, for example in deciding which parts of the Ocean will be included under the 30% area to be protected by 2030—and how the remaining 70% will be used. Equitable and just outcomes of biodiversity conservation essentially require a revolution in the ways local and Indigenous communities are engaged in governance, placing them front and center (Armitage et al., 2020). The tools and approaches for this include participatory processes and participatory methods as exemplified in transdisciplinarity (Klein et al., 2001; Mauser et al., 2013; Gómez and Köpsel, 2022; Hills and Maharaj, 2023), co-creation of knowledge through research co-design and knowledge co-production (Norström et al., 2020), the use of arts, narratives and creative practices (Merrie et al., 2018; Paterson et al., 2020; Strand et al., 2022; Whittaker, 2023), and innovative, meaningful partnerships (Charles, 2019; Haelewaters et al., 2021; Kater, 2022). Indeed, what is needed is a new science-society compact for the Ocean (Celliers et al., 2023), which aligns science much closer with society and decision-making. Work on the science/society/policy nexus of the Ocean will yield new methodological and conceptual insights to support this transformation of Ocean sciences. The current rates of change in the Ocean and the increasingly accelerating rate of pervasive human activity (Jouffray et al., 2020) contrast with often sluggish governance responses and institutional change, underlining that we urgently need a step change in the agility and responsiveness of governance structures and the ways that knowledge feeds into decision-making. Simultaneously fostering participatory and democratic processes, which can slow down decision-making processes, is a challenging yet crucial task. It is becoming clear that Ocean governance will have to become much more inclusive of the global diversity of society, knowledge systems and cultures, overcoming the Western-dominated, extraction-oriented paradigms that underpinned much of marine science and management until now. Decolonial marine sciences and practices hold the potential to develop new ways of knowledge generation, giving voice to previously marginalized communities (including Indigenous actors and non-Western scholars), and shaping more holistic and sustainable relationships of humanity and the Ocean in the twenty-first century (George and Wiebe, 2020; Trisos et al., 2021; Bourgeois et al., 2022; Spalding et al., 2023).
2. Conclusion
Ensuring sustainability of the multitude of increasing human activities in and uses of the Ocean requires adequate marine governance. This ranges from transnational and global efforts at regulating use of open oceans (i.e., ABNJ) and the deep sea to national legislation and regional coordination, approaches bridging the land-ocean interface, local and Indigenous forms of management, and grassroots initiatives. New forms of participation, co-design, visions of the future, linking arts, sciences and society, conceptual advances in governance and management, and practical experiences from around the world are just some examples of recent frontiers in marine governance for Ocean sustainability. The Section “Marine Governance” will bring together a collection of studies using conceptual, applied, synthesis and case study approaches of disciplinary, inter- and transdisciplinary nature to address questions of how to achieve just, equitable and sustainable use of and interaction with the Ocean in the twenty-first century.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
SF: Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing, Investigation, Writing—original draft.
Funding
This work was made possible by financial support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the frame of the LeNa Shape project (grant 01UV2110F).
Acknowledgments
I am grateful for critical feedback from and discussions with Annette Breckwoldt, Marie Fujitani, Marion Glaser, and Achim Schlüter (Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research [ZMT] Bremen), Louis Celliers (GERICS/Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon) and Ángel Borja (AZTI Marine Research), which helped shape and sharpen some of the perspectives in this article, as well as for comments and feedback received during review.
Conflict of interest
SF was employed by Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT) Bremen GmbH. The author(s) SF declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1.^ The capitalized spelling of Ocean is used throughout the text to signify the interconnected nature of all of the world's seas that requires equitable cooperation in order to conserve and sustainably use them (Crowder, 2022), as well as the characterization of oceans not only as biogeophysical features but also as spheres of great cultural, socio-economic and political importance. It should not be understood to negate the importance of local context and individual histories (Schwerdtner Máñez et al., 2023).
References
1
Adewumi I. J. (2021). Exploring the nexus and utilities between regional and global ocean governance architecture. Front. Mar. Sci.8, 645557. 10.3389/fmars.2021.645557
2
Amano T. Ramírez-Castañeda V. Berdejo-Espinola V. Borokini I. Chowdhury S. Golivets M. et al . (2023). The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science. PLoS Biol.21, e3002184. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184
3
Armitage D. Mbatha P. Muhl E.-K. Rice W. Sowman M. (2020). Governance principles for community-centered conservation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Conserv. Sci. Pract.2, e160. 10.1111/csp2.160
4
Aswani S. Basurto X. Ferse S. Glaser M. Campbell L. Cinner J. E. et al . (2018). Marine resource management and conservation in the Anthropocene. Environ. Conserv.45, 192–202. 10.1017/S0376892917000431
5
Backstrom A. C. Garrard G. E. Hobbs R. J. Bekessy S. A. (2018). Grappling with the social dimensions of novel ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ.16, 109–117. 10.1002/fee.1769
6
Ban N. C. Frid A. (2018). Indigenous peoples' rights and marine protected areas. Mar. Pol.87, 180–185. 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.020
7
Ban N. C. Frid A. Reid M. Edgar B. Shaw D. Siwallace P. (2018). Incorporate Indigenous perspectives for impactful research and effective management. Nature Ecol. Evol.2, 1680–1683. 10.1038/s41559-018-0706-0
8
Barbier E. B. (2017). Marine ecosystem services. Curr. Biol.27, R507–R510. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.020
9
Barragán J. M. de Andrés M. (2015). Analysis and trends of the world's coastal cities and agglomerations. Ocean Coast. Manag.114, 11–20. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.004
10
Bennett N. J. (2022). Mainstreaming Equity and Justice in the Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci.9, 873572. 10.3389/fmars.2022.873572
11
Bennett N. J. Cisneros-Montemayor A. M. Blythe J. Silver J. J. Singh G. Andrews N. et al . (2019). Towards a sustainable and equitable blue economy. Nature Sustain.2, 991–993. 10.1038/s41893-019-0404-1
12
Bennett N. J. Govan H. Satterfield T. (2015). Ocean grabbing. Mar. Pol.57, 61–68. 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.026
13
Bergseth B. J. Arias A. Barnes M. L. Caldwell I. Datta A. Gelcich S. et al . (2023). Closing the compliance gap in marine protected areas with human behavioural sciences. Fish Fish.24, 695–704. 10.1111/faf.12749
14
Blackburn S. Marques C. de Sherbinin A. Modesto F. Ojima R. Oliveau S. et al . (2013). “Mega-urbanisation on the coast global context and key trends in the twenty-first century,” in Megacities and the Coast: Risk, Resilience and Transformation, eds PellingM.BlackburnS. (London, UK and New York, NY, USA: Routledge), p. 1–21.
15
Borja A. (2023). Grand challenges in ocean sustainability. Front. Ocean Sustain.1, 1050165. 10.3389/focsu.2023.1050165
16
Borja A. White M. P. Berdalet E. Bock N. Eatock C. Kristensen P. et al . (2020). Moving toward an agenda on ocean health and human health in Europe. Front. Mar. Sci.7, 37. 10.3389/fmars.2020.00037
17
Bourgeois R. Karuri-Sebina G. Feukeu K. E. (2022). The future as a public good: decolonising the future through anticipatory participatory action research. Foresight.10.1108/FS-11-2021-0225. [Epub ahead of print].
18
Breckwoldt A. Ratter B. M. W. Wang W.-C. (2018). Editorial: fishing for human perceptions in coastal and island marine resource use systems. Front. Mar. Sci.5, 62. 10.3389/fmars.2018.00062
19
Breitburg D. Levin L. A. Oschlies A. Grégoire M. Chavez F. P. Conley D. J. et al . (2018). Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science359, 7240. 10.1126/science.aam7240
20
Bronselaer B. Zanna L. (2020). Heat and carbon coupling reveals ocean warming due to circulation changes. Nature584, 227–233. 10.1038/s41586-020-2573-5
21
Brum Bulanti L. Lagos Miranda X. Marrero Beramendi L. (2022). “Empty oceans—humanizing ocean and seascapes for building transdisciplinary knowledge and practice,” in Transdisciplinary Marine Research—Bridging Science and Society, eds. GómezS.KöpselV. (Abingdon, UK and New York, NY, USA: Routledge), p. 19.
22
Buchan P. M. Evans L. S. Pieraccini M. Barr S. (2023). Marine citizenship: The right to participate in the transformation of the human-ocean relationship for sustainability. PLoS ONE18, e0280518. 10.1371/journal.pone.0280518
23
Bulleri F. Batten S. Connell S. D. Benedetti-Cecchi L. Gibbons M. Nugues M. M. et al . (2020). Human pressures and the emergence of novel marine ecosystems. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev.58, 456–535. 10.1201/9780429351495-9
24
Bush S. R. Bottema M. Midavaine J. J. Carter E. (2017). “Sustainability entrepreneurship in marine protected areas,” in Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation, eds. NicolopoulouK.Karatas-OzkanM.JanssenF.JermierJ. M. (New York City, NY: Routledge), p. 124–140.
25
Cabral R. B. Aliño P. M. (2011). Transition from common to private coasts: consequences of privatization of the coastal commons. Ocean Coast. Manag.54, 66–74. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.023
26
Campbell L. M. Gray N. J. Fairbanks L. Silver J. J. Gruby R. L. Dubik B. A. et al . (2016). Global Oceans Governance: New and Emerging Issues. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.41, 517–543. 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021121
27
Celliers L. Mañez Costa M. Rölfer L. Aswani S. Ferse S. (2023). Social innovation that connects people to coasts in the Anthropocene. Cambridge Prisms: Coast. Fut.1, e24. 10.1017/cft.2023.12
28
Charles A. (2019). “The future of ocean governance and capacity development: essays in honor of elisabeth mann borgese (1918-2002),” in Meaningful Partnerships in Meaningful Ocean Governance, ed. International Ocean Institute—Canada (Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff), p. 28–33.
29
Clement S. Standish R. J. (2018). Novel ecosystems: Governance and conservation in the age of the Anthropocene. J. Environ. Manag.208, 36–45. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.013
30
Crowder L. B. (2022). One ocean. Conserv. Sci. Pract.4, e12692. 10.1111/csp2.12692
31
Dupont S. Fauville G. (2017). “Ocean literacy as a key toward sustainable development and ocean governance,” in Handbook on the Economics and Management of Sustainable Oceans, eds. NunesP.a.L.D.SvenssonL.E.MarkandyaA. (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing), 519–537.
32
Estradivari A.gung, M. F. Adhuri D. S. Ferse S. C. A. Sualia I. Andradi-Brown D. A. et al . (2022). Marine conservation beyond MPAs: towards the recognition of other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) in Indonesia. Mar. Pol.137, 104939. 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104939
33
FAO Duke University, and WorldFish. (2023). Illuminating Hidden Harvests—The contributions of small-scale fisheries to sustainable development. Rome, Italy.
34
Feely R. A. Sabine C. L. Lee K. Berelson W. Kleypas J. Fabry V. J. et al . (2004). Impact of anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 system in the oceans. Science305, 362–366. 10.1126/science.1097329
35
Ferse S. C. A. Máñez Costa M. Schwerdtner Máñez K. Adhuri D. S. Glaser M. (2010). Allies, not aliens: increasing the role of local communities in marine protected area implementation. Environ. Conserv.37, 23–34. 10.1017/S0376892910000172
36
Fleming L. E. Maycock B. White M. P. Depledge M. H. (2019). Fostering human health through ocean sustainability in the 21st century. People Nat.1, 276–283. 10.1002/pan3.10038
37
Gaill F. Brodie Rudolph T. Lebleu L. Allemand D. Blasiak R. Cheung W. W. L. et al . (2022). An evolution towards scientific consensus for a sustainable ocean future. npj Ocean Sustain.1, 7. 10.1038/s44183-022-00007-1
38
Gattuso J.-P. Williamson P. Duarte C. M. Magnan A. K. (2021). The potential for ocean-based climate action: negative emissions technologies and beyond. Front. Clim.2, 716. 10.3389/fclim.2020.575716
39
George R. Y. Wiebe S. M. (2020). Fluid decolonial futures: water as a life, ocean citizenship and seascape relationality. New Polit. Sci.42, 498–520. 10.1080/07393148.2020.1842706
40
Gerhardinger L. C. Gorris P. Gonçalves L. R. Herbst D. F. Vila-Nova D. A. De Carvalho F. G. et al . (2018). Healing Brazil's blue amazon: the role of knowledge networks in nurturing cross-scale transformations at the frontlines of ocean sustainability. Front. Mar. Sci.4, 395. 10.3389/fmars.2017.00395
41
Gjerde K. M. Yadav S. S. (2021). Polycentricity and regional ocean governance: implications for the emerging un agreement on marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction. Front. Mar. Sci.8, 1205. 10.3389/fmars.2021.704748
42
Glavovic B. C. Limburg K. Liu K. K. Emeis K. C. Thomas H. Kremer H. et al . (2015). Living on the Margin in the anthropocene: engagement arenas for sustainability research and action at the ocean–land interface. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust.14, 232–238. 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.003
43
Gómez S. Köpsel V. (2022). Transdisciplinary Marine Research: Bridging Science and Society. Abingdon, UK and New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
44
Gurney G. G. Darling E. S. Ahmadia G. N. Agostini V. N. Ban N. C. Blythe J. et al . (2021). Biodiversity needs every tool in the box: use OECMs. Nature595, 646–649. 10.1038/d41586-021-02041-4
45
Häder D.-P. (2021). “Dumping of toxic waste into the oceans,” in Anthropogenic Pollution of Aquatic Ecosystems, eds HäderD.-P.HelblingE.W.VillafañeV.E. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), p. 353–371.
46
Haelewaters D. Hofmann T. A. Romero-Olivares A. L. (2021). Ten simple rules for Global North researchers to stop perpetuating helicopter research in the Global South. PLOS Comput. Biol.17, e1009277. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009277
47
Hills J. M. Maharaj P. N. (2023). Designing transdisciplinarity for transformative ocean governance. Front. Mar. Sci.10, 1075759. 10.3389/fmars.2023.1075759
48
Huxley T. H. (1883). Inaugural Meeting of the Fishery Congress: Address Delivered June 18, 1883. London: William Clowes and Sons.
49
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2022). IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
50
Jackson J. B. C. Kirby M. X. Berger W. H. Bjorndal K. A. Botsford L. W. Bourque B. J. et al . (2001). Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science293, 629–637. 10.1126/science.1059199
51
Jarvis R. M. Young T. (2023). Pressing questions for science, policy, and governance in the high seas. Environ. Sci. Policy139, 177–184. 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.001
52
Jouffray J.-B. Blasiak R. Norström A. V. Österblom H. Nyström M. (2020). The blue acceleration: the trajectory of human expansion into the ocean. One Earth2, 43–54. 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.016
53
Kater I. (2022). Natural and Indigenous sciences: reflections on an attempt to collaborate. Reg. Environ. Change22, 109. 10.1007/s10113-022-01967-3
54
Klein J. T. Grossenbacher-Mansuy W. Häberli R. Bill A. Scholz R. W. Welti M. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving Among Science, Technology, and Society: An Effective Way for Managing Complexity. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag.
55
Knowlton N. Grottoli A. G. Kleypas J. Obura D. Corcoran E. de Goeij J. M. et al . (2021). Rebuilding Coral Reefs: A Decadal Grand Challenge. Bremen, Germany: International Coral Reef Society and Future Earth Coasts.
56
Lampitt R. S. Achterberg E. P. Anderson T. R. Hughes J. A. Iglesias-Rodriguez M. D. Kelly-Gerreyn B. A. et al . (2008). Ocean fertilization: a potential means of geoengineering?Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.366, 3919–3945. 10.1098/rsta.2008.0139
57
Landrigan P. J. Stegeman J. J. Fleming L. E. Allemand D. Anderson D. M. Backer L. C. et al . (2020). Human health and ocean pollution. Annals Global Health86, 151. 10.5334/aogh.2831
58
Lecerf M. Herr D. Thomas T. Elverum C. Delrieu E. Picourt L. (2021). “Coastal and marine ecosystems as Nature-based Solutions in new or updated Nationally Determined Contributions.” (Paris, France: Ocean and Climate Platform, Conservation International, IUCN, GIZ, Rare, The Nature Conservancy, WWF).
59
Levin L. A. Amon D. J. Lily H. (2020). Challenges to the sustainability of deep-seabed mining. Nature Sustain.3, 784–794. 10.1038/s41893-020-0558-x
60
Mabon L. Kawabe M. (2022). Bring voices from the coast into the Fukushima treated water debate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA119, e2205431119. 10.1073/pnas.2205431119
61
Macreadie P. I. Anton A. Raven J. A. Beaumont N. Connolly R. M. Friess D. A. et al . (2019). The future of Blue carbon science. Nat. Comm.10, 3998. 10.1038/s41467-019-11693-w
62
Mahon R. Fanning L. (2019). Regional ocean governance: polycentric arrangements and their role in global ocean governance. Mar. Pol.107, 103590. 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103590
63
Martin C. L. Momtaz S. Gaston T. Moltschaniwskyj N. A. (2016). A systematic quantitative review of coastal and marine cultural ecosystem services: current status and future research. Mar. Pol.74, 25–32. 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.004
64
Mason L. R. Rigg J. (2019). People and climate change: Vulnerability, adaptation, and social justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65
Mauser W. Klepper G. Rice M. Schmalzbauer B. S. Hackmann H. Leemans R. et al . (2013). Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust.5, 420–431. 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001
66
McCauley D. J. Pinsky M. L. Palumbi S. R. Estes J. A. Joyce F. H. Warner R. R. (2015). Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean. Science15, 347. 10.1126/science.1255641
67
McCormack F. Mawyer A. (2022). Epilogue: immanence, relationality, connectivity. Ambio51, 2459–2461. 10.1007/s13280-022-01796-y
68
McKinley E. Acott T. Yates K. L. (2020). Marine social sciences: looking towards a sustainable future. Environ. Sci. Policy108, 85–92. 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.015
69
Mendenhall E. Tiller R. Nyman E. (2023). The ship has reached the shore: the final session of the ‘biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction' negotiations. Mar. Pol.155, 105686. 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105686
70
Merkens J.-L. Reimann L. Hinkel J. Vafeidis A. T. (2016). Gridded population projections for the coastal zone under the shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob. Planet. Change145, 57–66. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.08.009
71
Merrie A. Keys P. Metian M. Österblom H. (2018). Radical ocean futures-scenario development using science fiction prototyping. Futures95, 22–32. 10.1016/j.futures.2017.09.005
72
Nash K. L. Cvitanovic C. Fulton E. A. Halpern B. S. Milner-Gulland E. J. Watson R. A. et al . (2017). Planetary boundaries for a blue planet. Nature Ecol. Evol.1, 1625–1634. 10.1038/s41559-017-0319-z
73
Neumann B. Vafeidis A. T. Zimmermann J. Nicholls R. J. (2015). Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—a global assessment. PLoS ONE10, e0118571. 10.1371/journal.pone.0.0118571
74
NOAA Fisheries (2023). Equity and Environmental Justice Strategy. Silver Spring, MD, USA: NOAA Fisheries.
75
Norström A. V. Cvitanovic C. Löf M. F. West S. Wyborn C. Balvanera P. et al . (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustain.3, 182–190. 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
76
Partelow S. Hadjimichael M. Hornidge A.-K. (2023). “Ocean governance for sustainability transformation,” in Ocean Governance: Knowledge Systems, Policy Foundations and Thematic Analyses, eds PartelowS.HadjimichaelM.HornidgeA.-K. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), p. 1-21.
77
Partelow S. Schlüter A. von Wehrden H. Jänig M. Senff P. (2018). A sustainability agenda for tropical marine science. Conserv. Lett.11, e12351. 10.1111/conl.12351
78
Paterson S. K. Le Tissier M. Whyte H. Robinson L. B. Thielking K. Ingram M. et al . (2020). Examining the potential of art-science collaborations in the anthropocene: a case study of catching a wave. Front. Mar. Sci.7, 340. 10.3389/fmars.2020.00340
79
Peterson C. H. Lubchenco J. (1997). “Marine ecosystem services,” in Nature's Services: Societal Dependence On Natural Ecosystems, ed. DailyG. C. (Washington, DC, USA: Island Press), p. 177–194.
80
Pörtner H.-O. Scholes R. J. Arneth A. Barnes D. K. A. Burrows M. T. Diamond S. E. et al . (2023). Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts. Science380, eabl4881. 10.1126/science.abl4881
81
Rockström J. Gupta J. Qin D. Lade S. J. Abrams J. F. Andersen L. S. et al . (2023). Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature.23, 8. 10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8
82
Russ G. R. Zeller D. C. (2003). From mare liberum to mare reservarum. Mar. Pol.27, 75–78. 10.1016/S0308-597X(02)00054-4
83
Ryabinin V. Barbière J. Haugan P. Kullenberg G. Smith N. McLean C. et al . (2019). The UN decade of ocean science for sustainable development. Front. Mar. Sci.6, 470. 10.3389/fmars.2019.00470
84
Schwerdtner Máñez K. Stoll-Kleemann S. Rozwadowski H. M. (2023). Ocean literacies: the promise of regional approaches integrating ocean histories and psychologies. Front. Mar. Sci.10, 1178061. 10.3389/fmars.2023.1178061
85
Sekovski I. Newton A. Dennison W. C. (2012). Megacities in the coastal zone: using a driver-pressure-state-impact-response framework to address complex environmental problems. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci.96, 48–59. 10.1016/j.ecss.2011.07.011
86
Singh J. van Houtum H. (2002). Post-colonial nature conservation in Southern Africa: same emperors, new clothes?GeoJournal58, 253–263. 10.1023/B:GEJO.0000017956.82651.41
87
Smallhorn-West P. Allison E. Gurney G. Karnad D. Kretser H. Lobo A. S. et al . (2023). Why human rights matter for marine conservation. Front. Mar. Sci.10, 1089154. 10.3389/fmars.2023.1089154
88
Smith K. E. Burrows M. T. Hobday A. J. King N. G. Moore P. J. Gupta A. S. et al . (2023). Biological impacts of marine heatwaves. Annual Review of Marine Science15, 119–145. 10.1146/annurev-marine-032122-121437
89
Smith S. V. Swaney D. P. Talaue-Mcmanus L. Bartley J. D. Sandhei P. T. McLaughlin C. J. et al . (2003). Humans, hydrology, and the distribution of inorganic nutrient loading to the ocean. Bioscience53, 235–245. 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0235:HHATDO]2.0.CO;2
90
Spalding A. K. Grorud-Colvert K. Allison E. H. Amon D. J. Collin R. de Vos A. et al . (2023). Engaging the tropical majority to make ocean governance and science more equitable and effective. npj Ocean Sustain.2, 8. 10.1038/s44183-023-00015-9
91
Steinberg P. E. (2001). The Social Construction of the Ocean.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92
Stephenson R. L. Hobday A. J. Allison E. H. Armitage D. Brooks K. Bundy A. et al . (2021). The quilt of sustainable ocean governance: patterns for practitioners. Front. Mar. Sci.8, 547. 10.3389/fmars.2021.630547
93
Strand M. Rivers N. Snow B. (2022). Reimagining ocean stewardship: arts-based methods to ‘hear' and ‘see' indigenous and local knowledge in ocean management. Front. Mar. Sci.9, 886632. 10.3389/fmars.2022.886632
94
Talavera-Soza S. (2023). Citizenship a determining factor in a geoscientist's career. Nat. Geosci.16, 550–551. 10.1038/s41561-023-01221-3
95
Thakur S. (2022). “The Fukushima Conundrum: Ocean Disposal of Nuclear Waste,” in Maritime Perspectives 2022: Transitioning from a Brown to a Blue Economy in the face of Climate Change, eds. ChauhanP.LahiriD.BajajP. (New Delhi, India: National Maritime Foundation), p. 41–54.
96
Trisos C. H. Auerbach J. Katti M. (2021). Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology. Nature Ecol. Evol.5, 1205–1212. 10.1038/s41559-021-01460-w
97
UN Secretary-General (2020). Alongside Pandemic, World Faces ‘Triple Planetary Emergency', Secretary-General Tells World Forum for Democracy, Citing Climate, Nature, Pollution Crises [Online]. New York, NY, USA: United Nations Secretary-General Press Release SG/SM/20422. Available online at: https://press.un.org/en/2020/sgsm20422.doc.htm (accessed July 06, 2023).
98
Weiss C. V. C. Guanche R. Ondiviela B. Castellanos O. F. Juanes J. (2018). Marine renewable energy potential: a global perspective for offshore wind and wave exploitation. Energy Convers. Manag.177, 43–54. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.09.059
99
Whittaker G. R. (2023). Creatively connecting science, society and the sea: a mini-review of academic literature focusing on art-science collaborations and the ocean. Front. Mar. Sci.10, 776. 10.3389/fmars.2023.1234776
100
Wolff M. (2015). From sea sharing to sea sparing—is there a paradigm shift in ocean management?Ocean Coast. Manag.116, 58–63. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.07.004
101
Worm B. Barbier E. B. Beaumont N. Duffy J. E. Folke C. Halpern B. S. et al . (2006). Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science314, 787–790. 10.1126/science.1132294
Summary
Keywords
ABNJ, Blue Economy, equity, Indigenous and local communities, justice, knowledge co-creation, participation, transformation
Citation
Ferse SCA (2023) Grand challenges in marine governance for ocean sustainability in the twenty-first century. Front. Ocean Sustain. 1:1254750. doi: 10.3389/focsu.2023.1254750
Received
07 July 2023
Accepted
06 September 2023
Published
27 September 2023
Volume
1 - 2023
Edited by
Melanie Bishop, Macquarie University, Australia
Reviewed by
Vinicius Tavares Kutter, Federal University of Pará, Brazil
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Ferse.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sebastian C. A. Ferse sebastian.ferse@leibniz-zmt.de
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.