Skip to main content


Front. Oncol., 14 June 2019
Sec. Cancer Genetics

A Splice Site Variant of CDK12 and Breast Cancer in Three Eurasian Populations

\nNatalia V. Bogdanova,Natalia V. Bogdanova1,2Peter SchürmannPeter Schürmann1Yana Valova,Yana Valova1,3Natalia Dubrowinskaja,Natalia Dubrowinskaja1,4Nurzhan Turmanov,Nurzhan Turmanov1,5Tatyana YugayTatyana Yugay5Zura EssimsiitovaZura Essimsiitova6Elvira Mingazheva,Elvira Mingazheva1,3Darya ProkofyevaDarya Prokofyeva3Marina BermishevaMarina Bermisheva7Elza Khusnutdinova,Elza Khusnutdinova3,7Thilo Drk
Thilo Dörk1*
  • 1Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
  • 2Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
  • 3Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State University, Ufa, Russia
  • 4Department of Clinical Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
  • 5Oncology Clinic of Almaty, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • 6Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Kazakh State National University of Al-Farabi, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • 7Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia

CDK12 is a member of the cyclin-dependent kinase family that acts as regulator of DNA damage response gene expression. A c.1047-2A>G splice site variant of the CDK12 gene was recently reported to strongly associate with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in patients of Tatar ethnic origin. To gain more insight into the potential risk and the population spread of the c.1047-2A>G variant, we have genotyped three breast cancer case-control series of Tatar, Bashkir and Kazakh ethnicity. We identified c.1047-2A>G in 6/155 cases and 12/362 controls of Tatar ancestry, 0/96 cases and 9/189 controls of Bashkir ancestry, and 1/131 cases and 0/154 controls of Kazakh ancestry (Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.30–1.70, p = 0.45). Consistent with the absence of a large effect, bioinformatic analyses predicted that c.1047-2A>G modulates alternative splicing of a NAGNAG sequence rather than constituting a loss-of-function allele, and RT-PCR analyses of c.1047-2A>G heterozygous lymphocytes verified the usage of the predicted alternative acceptor site. Our study confirms a high prevalence of CDK12*c.1047-2A>G in the Tatar and Bashkir population but excludes a role as a clinically actionable high-risk breast cancer mutation.


Familial risk of breast cancer is associated with high- to moderate-penetrance mutations in genes encoding DNA double-strand break sensors and repair proteins, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, and others (1, 2). The hitherto known susceptibility genes account for only part of the familial clustering, and remaining cases could thus be explained by mutations in further DNA repair genes acting in the intracellular DNA damage response. Next-generation sequencing, either as gene panel testing or at a genome-wide scale, has already proven to be useful in identifying additional candidate breast cancer susceptibility genes (1, 35). As such mutations are generally rare, there is much interest in the investigation of ethnically homogeneous populations where disease-causing mutations can be enriched due to historical founder effects.

A recent report of Brovkina et al. (6) has indicated a significant association of a c.1047-2A>G splice variant in the CDK12 gene that was specifically found in 8 of 106 breast cancer cases (7.6%) from Tatarstan. Subsequent genotyping identified this mutation in 9/199 breast cancer patients (4.5%) from the Volga district of Tatarstan while it was present in just 1 of the 238 (0.4%) healthy control patients (p = 0.007), suggesting an about 10-fold increased risk for breast cancer. CDK12 encodes a member of the cyclin-dependent serine/threonine kinase family and is an important regulator of homologous recombinational repair (7). Disruption of CDK12 underlies the tandem duplicator phenotype that is enriched in several cancers including triple-negative breast cancer, ovarian, prostate, endometrial, and liver cancers (812). Loss of CDK12 suppresses the expression of homologous recombinational repair genes, probably via polyadenylation, thereby leading to a so-called “BRCAness” phenotype (7). Combination therapy comprising a PD-1 inhibitor and a PARP inhibitor may be an effective approach in patients with CDK12-deficient cancers (13). It is thus important to clarify the prevalence of germline CDK12 variants that may represent constitutive cancer susceptibility alleles.

In the present study, we aimed to replicate the association of the c.1047-2A>G splice variant in the CDK12 gene and to investigate its population-specific prevalence in hospital-based breast cancer case-control studies from Bashkortostan and Kazakhstan.

Patients and Methods


We investigated two breast cancer case-control series from Bashkortostan, Russia, and from Kazakhstan. Both series have been previously used for genetic association studies (1416). The series from Russia consisted of 1,059 breast cancer patients unselected for family history who had been diagnosed during the years 2000–2007 at the oncological center in Ufa (Bashkortostan). Breast cancer patients in this series belonged to different ethnic groups mainly living in the Volga Ural region of Russia, and included Russians, Tatars, Bashkirs, Ukrainians, and patients of other or mixed ancestry. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years (range 25–85 years), and 7% of patients reported a first-degree relative diagnosed with breast cancer. Healthy population controls included 1,069 volunteers from the same geographic regions, with a similar ethnic distribution and age distribution (median age 46 years, range 18–84 years). For the present association study, cases and controls were selected for Tatar or Bashkir ancestry, respectively. Breast cancer patients from other or mixed ethnic subgroups were not included into the CDK12 genotyping study. We also genotyped 262 unselected ovarian cancer patients from a previously described case series in Bashkortostan (17).

The series from Kazakhstan consisted of 281 breast cancer patients from Russian or Altaic subpopulations (including 131 Kazakhs) and 653 healthy female controls (including 154 known Kazakhs) that had been ascertained at the State Oncology Institute, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan. Patients had a median age at diagnosis of 52 years (range 27–91 years) and the healthy controls a median age of 41 years (range 19–73 years). Genotyping for CDK12 was limited to the subgroup of cases and controls with confirmed Kazakh ethnicity.

Our study was carried out with informed consent of the probands and was approved by local ethical boards at the respective institutions.

Mutation Analyses

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral white blood cells by routine phenol-chloroform extraction. A region from the CDK12 exon/intron boundary that harbors the c.1047-2A>G variant, was amplified using the primers 5′- GGC TGG TTT CTC AGA CTG TC-3′ and 5′-TGA GTT CAG CTC CCA GAC TG−3′. The PCR product of 304 bp was then subjected to restriction enzyme cleavage with MspI, which generates fragments of 154 and 150 bp only in the presence of the c.1047-2A>G variant. The cleavage products were separated through 2% agarose gel electrophoresis supplemented with GelRed Nucleic Acid Gel stain (Biotium, Freemont, USA) and were visualized on a UV transilluminator (Figure 1A).


Figure 1. Screening and splice site analysis of CDK12 c.1047-2A>G. (A) Identification of CDK12 c.1047-2A>G by means of MspI restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis on a 2% agarose gel. Mutation-specific cleavage produces a 154/150 bp band as exemplified in lane 2, with lanes 1 and 3 showing samples with wildtype genotypes. (B) Comparative assessment of Maximum Entropy 3′-splice site scores in the wildtype and the mutant context. Splice site scores were obtained from the MaxEntScore site (, accessed on Jan 15, 2019. The wildtype sequence harbors two adjacent acceptor splice sites of similar scores (upper two sequences), and the mutant sequence still can make use of the downstream site (bottom two sequences). (C) Sanger sequencing of RT-PCR products at the border between CDK12 exons 1 and 2. Upper panel: wildtype control, Lower panel: CDK12 c.1047-2A>G heterozygous carrier. Exon borders are indicated by a blue bar, and the main isoform is marked in bold while the minor isoform is indicated in italics. Note that the triplet of the alternative site (TAG, blue) is included in a majority of transcripts represented by the wildtype control sequencing reads, but only in a minority of transcripts from the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G heterozygous carrier.

For studies of alternative splicing, total RNA was isolated from fresh blood samples of one patient heterozygous for CDK12 c.1047-2A>G and from three patients and one healthy control without this variant, using a standard Trizol guanidinium-phenol extraction protocol. RNA was reverse transcribed using a cDNA synthesis kit (ThermoFisher) with random hexamer primers. RT-PCR was performed with 1 μl cDNA per 20 μl reaction using primers 5′-TCCTGAGCAAGCGGTCTCTG-3′ and 5′-TGAGTTCAGCTCCCAGACTG-3′. Sanger sequencing of RT-PCR products was performed with the reverse primer using BigDye chemistry on a 3130 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems).

Statistical and Bioinformatic Analyses

The prevalence of the c.1047-2A>G variant was compared in cases and healthy population controls stratified by ethnicity. Odds ratios (OR) per study were calculated from two-by-two tables and statistical significance was assessed with Fisher's exact test (2 df). Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios were then calculated from a fixed-effects meta-analysis of the Tatar, Bashkir and Kazakh case-control studies. An increment of 0.1 was added to allow for zero fields. All analyses were performed using STATA 12.0 (StataCorp LLC., Texas, USA).

For the in silico assessment of 3′-splice site strength, the MaxEntScore algorithm was used online to score 23 mers in the mutant and wildtype context ( A splice site was considered favorable over another if the score was higher in the Maximum Entropy model. We also made use of Human Splicing Finder as a second algorithm (


We first tested the genotype distribution of the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G splice site variant in the Hannover-Ufa Breast Cancer Study using genomic DNA samples from breast cancer cases and controls selected for Tatar ancestry where it had been originally described (6). PCR and RFLP analysis identified this variant in 6/155 breast cancer patients (4%) and 12/362 healthy female controls (3%) (Figure 1A; Table 1). The genotype distribution between cases and controls was not significantly different (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.34–3.45, p = 0.79). The median age at diagnosis for CDK12 c.1047-2A>G carriers was 53.5 years (range 40–61 years) and none had a family history of breast cancer, although one of the six carriers had a first-degree relative with ovarian cancer.


Table 1. Distribution of CDK12 c.1047-2A>G among cases and controls in three ethnic groups from Bashkortostan and Kazakhstan.

We then sought to investigate the prevalence of CDK12 c.1047-2A>G in populations beyond the Tatars and performed a replication study in patients of Bashkir ancestry, also selected from the Hannover-Ufa Breast Cancer Study. In the Bashkir subpopulation, this variant was detected in 0/96 breast cancer cases but in 9/189 healthy female controls (5%). This extended the prevalence of CDK12 c.1047-2A>G to Bashkirs but the result was suggestive of a protective rather than risk effect for this variant (p = 0.03).

Since the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G variant was present in individuals of both Tatar and Bashkir ancestry, we also genotyped a breast cancer case-control series from Kazakhstan to elucidate its spread toward the Central Asian continent. The variant was present in 1/131 Kazakh breast cancer cases and 0/154 ethnically matched population controls, indicating that it is rare in the Kazakh population.

A fixed-effects meta-analysis of the three substudies yielded a Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio of OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.30–1.70, p = 0.45), thus excluding over 2-fold increased risks, with no evidence of heterogeneity between studies (phet = 0.23) (Table 1).

We also genotyped genomic DNA samples of 262 unselected patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, drawn from a case series in Bashkortostan that has previously been described (17). We identified four heterozygous carriers (1.5%) of the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G variant in this group. That carrier frequency was again not significantly different from the 12/362 healthy female controls (3%) in Tatars, but only for one of the four heterozygous ovarian cancer patients a Tatar descent had clearly been documented and population stratification due to mixed ethnicity could not be excluded.

We noticed that the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G variant site is followed by an alternative splice acceptor site which, if used, would result in the loss of only one codon. The alternative site was predicted to be similarly strong as the reference site with MaxEntScores 6.93 and 6.65, respectively, and while the reference site is completely abolished by the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G variant, the alternative site would be strengthened in the mutant context (MaxEntScore 8.15) (Figure 1B). When using a second algorithm, Human Splicing Finder, the results were similar with scores of 90 and 87 for the canonical and the alternative NAG on the wildtype allele, and with the alternative NAG score increasing from 87 to 89 with the variant.

We aimed to validate these predictions in patient-derived material and isolated lymphocyte RNA from a patient heterozygous for the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G variant and from three patients and one healthy female control with wildtype sequence at that position. RT-PCR and sequencing indicated that, in accordance with the MaxEntScan prediction, the alternative site was used in ~30% of wildtype mRNA transcripts in all four individuals with a wildtype splice site whereas this rate increased to some 65% in the heterozygous carrier of the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G variant (Figure 1C), suggesting that the alternative site is reinforced in the presence of this variant.


Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), a family of proteins harboring a cyclin box, are important regulators driving and coordinating the eukaryotic cell cycle (18), and the development of CDK inhibitors is among the most recent advances in the treatment of breast cancer (19, 20). CDK12 may have a particularly interesting role as a new therapeutic target in oncology as its inhibition acts synthetically lethal with PARP1 inhibition, probably due to the role of CDK12 in homologous recombinational repair (2123), but it also seems to modulate the antitumor immune response (13). Some 5–15% of many tumors harbor structural changes in CDK12 which seems to render them susceptible to a tandem duplicator phenotype (10) and, in breast tumors, to an aggressive “BRCAness” phenotype (7). It is thus important to clarify the role of CDK12 variants for breast cancer risk and treatment.

While truncating CDK12 germline variants are very rare, the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G splice variant has recently been reported to occur quite commonly in Tatars where it has been found in some 5% of breast cancer patients and was associated with an about 10-fold increased breast cancer risk (6). This variant, rs138292741, has been recorded in the ExAc database with minor allele frequencies of 0.001 in South Asians and 0.0005 in Europeans, indicating that the Tatar population may harbor a founder effect and therefore might be particularly well suited for association studies regarding this CDK12 variant. The use of founder populations can strongly increase the power of association studies, though the rarity of mutations can also render these studies prone to false positive results due to population stratification and thus a careful selection of ethnically matched cases and controls is needed. Our study has confirmed the high prevalence of CDK12 c.1047-2A>G in Tatars but it also occurred in healthy population controls of Tatar or Bashkir ancestry at polymorphic frequencies. The results of our meta-analysis for the three studies in Tatars, Bashkirs and Kazakhs did not indicate an enrichment of carriers in cases and excluded a 2-fold increase in risk of breast cancer. When we include the hypothesis-generating study of Brovkina et al. (6) into the meta-analysis, the combined OR 1.37 (95% CI 0.70; 2.69) still does not confirm a role as susceptibility factor and indicates that any risk conferred by the CDK12 variant is very unlikely to be higher than 3-fold.

The CDK12 c.1047-2A>G may not be representative for a typical loss-of-function mutation in CDK12. Although it affects a conserved splice acceptor site and a skipping of the downstream exon would cause a loss of 295 amino acids, this site is followed by an alternative splice acceptor site the use of which would result in the loss of only one codon, a so-called NAGNAG sequence context (24). The alternative site was predicted to be similarly strong as the reference site with MaxEntScores 6.93 and 6.65, respectively, and while the reference site is completely abolished by the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G variant, the alternative site is strengthened in the mutant context (MaxEntScore 8.15). This in silico analysis is highly predictive (25) and indicates a potentially mild effect of the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G variant. A similar result was predicted using HSF as a second algorithm. Finally, our RT-PCR analyses for a heterozygous carrier indicated an increase in the usage of the alternative downstream acceptor site that was fully consistent with the predicted effect for the variant allele. Although it is still possible that other factors can modulate this splicing event, the most parsimonious interpretation of these data is that the CDK12 c.1047-2A>G variant reinforces the downstream acceptor site. Alternative splicing at NAGNAG acceptors is widespread and contributes to proteome plasticity (24). Such NAGNAG acceptor sites can amelioriate or bypass the phenotype of a mutation (26), but some can also act in a tissue-specific manner (27). In the present study, we had no possibility to determine the ratio of the protein isoforms and assess their stability and function in breast epithelial tissue. If CDK12 c.1047-2A>G has functional consequences, even due to the loss of a single amino acid Arg349 outside the catalytic domain, our results would still be compatible with a minor risk in the range of low-penetrance variants many of which have been detected through genome-wide association studies worldwide (16, 28). Very large study sizes, perhaps assisted by segregation analyses from multiple-case families, would be required to detect such modest effects.

In summary, our study has confirmed a high prevalence of a CDK12 c.1047-2A>G splice site variant in the Tatar as well as in the Bashkir population but provides evidence for alternative splicing as a likely attenuating mechanism for this variant. While minor risks for breast cancer cannot be excluded, our case-control analyses indicate that CDK12 c.1047-2A>G does not represent a clinically actionable mutation.

Data Availability

All datasets generated for this study are included in the manuscript and/or the supplementary files.

Ethics Statement

The experiments in the present study comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Ethics Commission at Hannover Medical School with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Commission at Hannover Medical School.

Author Contributions

TD, NT, and EK: designed the study. NB, PS, and YV: performed the genotyping and cDNA analyses. ND, NT, TY, ZE, EM, DP, MB, and EK: provided material and data. NB and TD: analyzed the data. TD: prepared the draft and all authors approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We thank the patients and healthy volunteers for their participation and the many clinicians at hospitals in Bashkortostan and Kazakhstan for their support of this work. MB was supported by grant 17-44-020498, 17-29-06014 of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. DP was supported by grant 18-29-09129 of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. EK was supported by the program for support the bioresource collections N007-030164/2 and study was performed as part of the assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation (NAAAA-A16-116020350032-1). TD was supported by grant Do761/10-1 from the German Research Foundation. The Hannover laboratory was furthermore supported by the Rudolf Bartling Foundation and the Claudia-von-Schilling Foundation for Breast Cancer Research.


1. Easton DF, Pharoah PD, Antoniou AC, Tischkowitz M, Tavtigian SV, Nathanson KL, et al. Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:2243–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1501341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Walsh MF, Nathanson KL, Couch FJ, Offit K. Genomic biomarkers for breast cancer risk. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2016) 882:1–32. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22909-6_1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kiiski JI, Pelttari LM, Khan S, Freysteinsdottir ES, Reynisdottir I, Hart SN, et al. Exome sequencing identifies FANCM as a susceptibility gene for triple-negative breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2014) 111:15172–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407909111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Riahi A, Radmanesh H, Schürmann P, Bogdanova N, Geffers R, Meddeb R, et al. Exome sequencing and case-control analyses identify RCC1 as a candidate breast cancer susceptibility gene. Int J Cancer. (2018) 142:2512–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Shimelis H, LaDuca H, Hu C, Hart SN, Na J, Thomas A, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer risk genes identified by multigene hereditary cancer panel testing. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2018) 110:855–62. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy106

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Brovkina OI, Shigapova L, Chudakova DA, Gordiev MG, Enikeev RF, Druzhkov MO, et al. The ethnic-specific spectrum of germline nucleotide variants in DNA damage response and repair genes in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients of tatar descent. Front Oncol. (2018) 8:421. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Dubbury SJ, Boutz PL, Sharp PA. CDK12 regulates DNA repair genes by suppressing intronic polyadenylation. Nature. (2018) 564:141–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0758-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Menghi F, Inaki K, Woo X, Kumar PA, Grzeda KR, Malhotra A, et al. The tandem duplicator phenotype as a distinct genomic configuration in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2016) 113:E2373–82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520010113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Popova T, Manié E, Boeva V, Battistella A, Goundiam O, Smith NK, et al. Ovarian cancers harboring inactivating mutations in CDK12 display a distinct genomic instability pattern characterized by large tandem duplications. Cancer Res. (2016) 76:1882–91. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Menghi F, Barthel FP, Yadav V, Tang M, Ji B, Tang Z, et al. The tandem duplicator phenotype is a prevalent genome-wide cancer configuration driven by distinct gene mutations. Cancer Cell. (2018) 34:197–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Quigley DA, Dang HX, Zhao SG, Lloyd P, Aggarwal R, Alumkal JJ, et al. Genomic hallmarks and structural variation in metastatic prostate cancer. Cell. (2018) 174:758–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Viswanathan SR, Ha G, Hoff AM, Wala JA, Carrot-Zhang J, Whelan CW, et al. Structural alterations driving castration-resistant prostate cancer revealed by linked-read genome sequencing. Cell. (2018) 174:433–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Antonarakis ES. Cyclin-dependent kinase 12, immunity, and prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. (2018) 379:1087–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcibr1808772

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Bogdanova N, Cybulski C, Bermisheva M, Datsyuk I, Yamini P, Hillemanns P, et al. A nonsense mutation (E1978X) in the ATM gene is associated with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. (2009) 118:207–11. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0189-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Prokofyeva D, Bogdanova N, Dubrowinskaja N, Bermisheva M, Takhirova Z, Antonenkova N, et al. Nonsense mutation p.Q548X in BLM, the gene mutated in Bloom's syndrome, is associated with breast cancer in Slavic populations. Breast Cancer Res Treat. (2013) 137:533–9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2357-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Michailidou K, Lindström S, Dennis J, Beesley J, Hui S, Kar S, et al. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci. Nature. (2017) 551:92–4. doi: 10.1038/nature24284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Prokofyeva D, Bogdanova N, Bermisheva M, Zinnatullina G, Hillemanns P, Khusnutdinova E, et al. Rare occurrence of PALB2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients from the Volga-Ural region. Clin Genet. (2012) 82:100–1. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01824.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Malumbres M. Cyclin-dependent kinases. Genome Biol. (2014) 15:122. doi: 10.1186/gb4184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lin ZP, Zhu YL, Ratner ES. Targeting cyclin-dependent kinases for treatment of gynecologic cancers. Front Oncol. (2018) 8:303. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Tong CWS, Wu M, Cho WCS, To KKW. Recent advances in the treatment of breast cancer. Front Oncol. (2018) 8:227. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Joshi PM, Sutor SL, Huntoon CJ, Karnitz LM. Ovarian cancer-associated mutations disable catalytic activity of CDK12, a kinase that promotes homologous recombination repair and resistance to cisplatin and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. J Biol Chem. (2014) 289:9247–53. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.551143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Chilà R, Guffanti F, Damia G. Role and therapeutic potential of CDK12 in human cancers. Cancer Treat Rev. (2016) 50:83–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.09.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Johnson SF, Cruz C, Greifenberg AK, Dust S, Stover DG, Chi D, et al. CDK12 inhibition reverses de novo and acquired PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA wild-type and mutated models of triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Rep. (2016) 17:2367–81. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Hiller M, Huse K, Szafranski K, Jahn N, Hampe J, Schreiber S, et al. Widespread occurrence of alternative splicing at NAGNAG acceptors contributes to proteome plasticity. Nat Genet. (2004) 36:1255–7. doi: 10.1038/ng1469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Eng L, Coutinho G, Nahas S, Yeo G, Tanouye R, Babaei M, et al. Nonclassical splicing mutations in the coding and noncoding regions of the ATM Gene: maximum entropy estimates of splice junction strengths. Hum Mutat. (2004) 23:67–76. doi: 10.1002/humu.10295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Hinzpeter A, Aissat A, Sondo E, Costa C, Arous N, Gameiro C, et al. Alternative splicing at a NAGNAG acceptor site as a novel phenotype modifier. PLoS Genet. (2010) 6:e1001153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Bradley RK, Merkin J, Lambert NJ, Burge CB. Alternative splicing of RNA triplets is often regulated and accelerates proteome evolution. PLoS Biol. (2012) 10:e1001229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Lilyquist J, Ruddy KJ, Vachon CM, Couch FJ. Common genetic variation and breast cancer risk-past, present, and future. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2018) 27:380–94. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: breast carcinoma, genetic susceptibility, DNA double-strand break repair, chromosome breakage syndrome, founder mutation

Citation: Bogdanova NV, Schürmann P, Valova Y, Dubrowinskaja N, Turmanov N, Yugay T, Essimsiitova Z, Mingazheva E, Prokofyeva D, Bermisheva M, Khusnutdinova E and Dörk T (2019) A Splice Site Variant of CDK12 and Breast Cancer in Three Eurasian Populations. Front. Oncol. 9:493. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00493

Received: 12 February 2019; Accepted: 24 May 2019;
Published: 14 June 2019.

Edited by:

Ihab Younis, Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar, Qatar

Reviewed by:

Nancy Uhrhammer, Centre Jean Perrin, France
Daisuke Kaida, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan

Copyright © 2019 Bogdanova, Schürmann, Valova, Dubrowinskaja, Turmanov, Yugay, Essimsiitova, Mingazheva, Prokofyeva, Bermisheva, Khusnutdinova and Dörk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Thilo Dörk,

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.