REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Breast Cancer
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1507840
Part II: Consensus Statements and Expert Recommendations for BRCA-Associated Breast Cancer in the Asia-Pacific Region: Clinical Management
Provisionally accepted- 1Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- 3Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 4Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- 5National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 6Ciptomangunkusumo National General Hospital/Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
- 7Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- 8St Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City and Global City, Manila, Philippines
- 9National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 10King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- 11bachmai hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
- 12UM Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- 13National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea
- 14Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 15Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, SONGPA-GU, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Existing guidelines have practical gaps in decision and treatment sequencing for BRCA germline pathogenic variant breast cancers. This paper aims to develop clinical-practice consensus guidelines to address these gaps in the clinical management of BRCA germline pathogenic variants-associated breast cancer in the Asia -Pacific region.Methods: An expert panel of 16 medical oncologists, geneticists, and breast cancer surgeons from the Asia -Pacific region arrived at 25 statements. The high level of consensus of statements was considered at ≥75%. A survey of 134 healthcare practitioners, breast cancer surgeons, geneticists, oncologists, molecular biologists/pathologists explored the real-world practices in the Asia -Pacific region.Results: A consensus was reached for 80% of the statements (20/25) and aligned with the international guidelines.A significant gap was observed between real-world practices and the recommendations of the steering committee members in discussing contralateral risk reducing mastectomy with the patients as a part of standard practice, considering poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) + immunotherapy for early triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC) patients with BRCA variants who don't achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + immunotherapy, use of adjuvant PARPi in patients with BRCA germline pathogenic variants in eTNBC who have achieved pathological complete response from neoadjuvant therapy, and preference for endocrine therapy + PARPi over endocrine therapy + cyclin -dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as escalated adjuvant treatment for BRCA pathogenic variants with high -risk hormone receptor positive/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-negative) early breast cancer.Testing for BRCA germline pathogenic variants should be expanded to include all young patients with breast cancer. Patients with BRCA germline pathogenic variants should undergo genetic testing before surgery as it can impact surgical intervention decisions and further systemic treatment. The use of neoadjuvant platinum agents in chemotherapy increases the pathological complete response rate. Adjuvant PARPi is preferred over CDK4/6i as escalated treatment in patients who are HR+/HER2 -negative.
Keywords: BRCA germline pathogenic variants, Early breast cancer, HER2, PARP inhibitors, Triple-negative breast cancer
Received: 08 Oct 2024; Accepted: 28 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Park, Lee, Singer, Balmaña, Dent, Kiak-Mien Tan, Mulansari, Md, Que, Lu, Parinyanitikul, Pham, Taib, Kong, Antill and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yeon Hee Park, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.