ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1516643
This article is part of the Research TopicImmune Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Immuno-Oncology: Refining the Immunological Landscape of CancerView all 32 articles
Association between emotional distress and the efficacy of advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A cohort study and propensity score matching study
Provisionally accepted- 1Center for National Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 2Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Cancer patients are at a greater risk of experiencing emotional distress (ED) compared to individuals without cancer, with those diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC) exhibiting a higher prevalence of ED than patients with other types of malignancies. A meta-analysis showed that 37% of global GC patients had depressive symptoms. Numerous studies have demonstrated that ED can lead cancer patients to develop immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments (TME), thereby impairing the exertion of antitumor immune effects. Currently, there is a lack of research investigating the correlation between ED and outcomes in GC patients undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We conducted a prospective cohort study to explore the correlation between ED and tumor response as well as prognostic outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer(AGC) who received ICIs treatment. We prospectively enrolled 104 patients with AGC undergoing combination therapy with ICIs, of whom 46 (44.2%) exhibited ED, defined as symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥5) and/or anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale score ≥5) at baseline. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) criteria were employed to evaluate tumor response. We analyzed the correlation between ED and outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).Results: Baseline ED was associated with a higher risk of death (HR: 2.035, 95%CI:1.272-3.254, P=0.003) and higher risk of progression (HR: 3.006, 95%CI: 1.922-4.701, P<0.001), as well as a lower DCR (RR: 0.504, 95%CI: 0.343-0.742,P=0.001), in AGC patients undergoing ICIs therapy. Cox multivariate analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) still indicated a significant correlation between ED status and survival outcomes. The baseline ED was not significantly correlated with cortisol levels with a HR of 2.318 (95% CI: 0.805-6.679, P=0.119).Patients exhibiting baseline depressive symptoms was correlated with reduced OS (HR:
Keywords: gastric cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, Emotional distress, Depression, Anxiety, prognosis
Received: 24 Oct 2024; Accepted: 08 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tian, Wang, Ji, Li, Zhang, Zhang and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zhanjun Guo, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.