METHODS article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Radiation Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1517132
This article is part of the Research TopicCurrent Status And Recent Advances In Preclinical Models For Rare CancersView all 8 articles
Radioresistant Mouse Pheochromocytoma Cell Lines
Provisionally accepted- 1Department Radiopharmaceutical and Chemical Biology, Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), Dresden, Germany
- 2Technical University Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus,Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Dresden, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Patients diagnosed with metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PCC/PGL) have limited treatment options. In some cases, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is followed by an eruption of metastases, possibly originating from tumor cells with a radioresistant phenotype. However, the underlying mechanisms of radioresistance in PCC/PGL remain largely unknown and appropriate models are missing.Methods: Two genetically modified mouse pheochromocytoma (MPC) cell lines, one positive and one negative for hypoxia-inducible factor 2α expression (MPC+HIF 2α and MPC+EV [empty vector], respectively), were X ray-conditioned through fractionated irradiation at sublethal doses. Two procedures were tested: one allowed for recovery between each irradiation step (recIR), while the other demanded daily irradiation (dayIR). Changes in cell morphology, growth rates, and DNA repair (γH2AX immunostaining) were characterized in response to irradiation.Results: We generated two MPC+HIF 2α- and two MPC+EV-derived cell lines that tolerate irradiations with X rays at dose fractions of 2 Gy per day without significant growth inhibition. All recIR-and dayIR-conditioned cell lines showed increased DNA repair capacity. Morphological changes toward stronger clustering and slower growth were more pronounced in dayIR-conditioned than in recIR-conditioned cell lines. X ray-conditioned MPC+HIF-2α cells showed the highest increase in resistance to X ray-treatment with dose fractions up to 5 Gy per day.Conclusion: The herein established X ray-conditioned MPC cell lines represent PCC/PGL models with a radioresistant phenotype. Further investigations on the radiation-induced genetic responses of these cell lines, their corresponding tumor spheroids, and tumor allografts in mice will help to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of acquired radioresistance and radionuclide therapy-induced metastatic eruption in PCC/PGL. Lastly, the suitability of advanced PRRT and complementary treatments can be tested to improve theranostic strategies.
Keywords: radioresistance, x-ray, Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma, irradiation, HIF-2α, Pseudohypoxia
Received: 25 Oct 2024; Accepted: 25 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lemm, Richter, Ullrich and Pietzsch. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Martin Ullrich, Department Radiopharmaceutical and Chemical Biology, Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), Dresden, 01328, Germany
Jens Pietzsch, Department Radiopharmaceutical and Chemical Biology, Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), Dresden, 01328, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.