ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Thoracic Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1527690
Immunotherapy rechallenge after ICI-related pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Respiratory Disease, Taizhou hospital of Zhejiang province affiliated to Wenzhou medical university, Taizhou, China
- 2Department of Respiratory Disease, Thoracic Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- 3Radiology Department, Thoracic Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significant advantages in treating lung cancer due to their low toxicity and high efficacy. However, adverse events, especially ICI-related pneumonitis (CIP), may restrict their applicability. CIP not only impairs patients' lung function but also carries a 35% mortality rate, thereby restricting ICIs rechallenge. As information is limited on the efficacy and safety of ICIs rechallenge, these issues were assessed in the present study.The data on 2673 patients who underwent ICI therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University between 2019 and 2023 were reviewed, identifying 106 patients with CIP who were allocated to rechallenge, non-discontinuation, and permanent discontinuation groups. Baseline information was collected, including sex, age, staging, pathological type, medication details, and underlying diseases, along with treatment status post-CIP occurrence, re-challenge of ICIs, and data on disease progression and mortality. The clinical studies examined the efficacy of treatments by assessing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as key indicators.Results: No significant difference in CIP onset time was observed between grades 1-2 and 3-4 (P = 0.99) , CIP was found to occur most frequently 5.17 months after treatment initiation (95%CI 4.61-5.72). The likelihood of CIP recurrence or progression while continuing ICI treatment was 50% (15/30). Patients who resumed ICI treatment and did not cease taking the medication showed markedly improved outcomes relative to those who permanently discontinued treatment, with a 6-month longer mPFS (13.67 vs. 7.90 months, P<0.001) and a twofold increase in mOS (33.77 vs.13.23 months, P=0.002).The outcomes of patients with CIP were found to be contingent upon rechallenge or continuation of ICIs.Contrary to the belief that an earlier restart is always better, decisions to reinitiate ICIs should be based on the improvement of symptoms and radiographic findings.
Keywords: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), lung cancer, Checkpoint inhibitor related pneumonia (CIP), Rechallenge, PD1/PD-L1
Received: 13 Nov 2024; Accepted: 11 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 wu, Qu, Zheng, Wu, Wang, Gan, Jiang, Li, Zhou, Zhou, Lv and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jianya Zhou, Department of Respiratory Disease, Thoracic Disease Center, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
Dongqing Lv, Department of Respiratory Disease, Taizhou hospital of Zhejiang province affiliated to Wenzhou medical university, Taizhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.