ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1553874
The initiation of the second-step intradisciplinary tumor board discussion and its impact on treatment decision. Retrospective data analysis of 12 years' experience in a tertiary oncology center
Provisionally accepted
- Clinical Center, Pécs University, Pécs, Hungary
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are generally accepted forums for the quality of cancer care, however, there is an ongoing debate about the substantial role of MDTs in reaching optimal treatment decisions. In our tertiary oncology center, a second-step intradisciplinary seu oncotherapy tumor board (OTT) discussion system was introduced to increase the adherence of MDT's decision making with the knowledge of patients' preference and tolerance, and to partially relieve MDT's overwork in the purely adjuvant and the palliative treatment settings. Over the real-world tumor board data elaboration, the primary aim of this observational study was to present the impact of OTT meetings on treatment decisions. Methods: The data of 33,056 cases of 27,227 patients were retrospectively analyzed with using a regular expression-based word search algorithm. Subsequent modifications of OTT decisions were defined as "minor", when only some additional suggestions were introduced, "moderate" when the treatment items were significantly modified, and "major" when the direction of the treatment was fully transformed. Results: During the 12-year observation period (2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019) the number of patients and case discussions, average age of the patients, percentage of sophisticated treatment methods, and the number of treatment lines / decisions made for the same patient had been continuously increased. The average percentage of minor, moderate and major modifications were 2.28, 6.4 and 8.92%, respectively, implying a remarkably high modification rate of the primary recommendations. Conclusion: Considering the growing complexity and multiplicity of oncology care, regular OTT board meetings can increase the accuracy of MDT's work and treatment decisions without any overwork of the related disciplines and can also serve as an additive / alternative teamwork forum in the adjuvant, multiple line, and palliative care settings.
Keywords: cancer care, Tumor board, multidisciplinary, Intradisciplinary, Treatment decision
Received: 31 Dec 2024; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mangel, Kövér, Pécsi and Boncz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Laszlo Csaba Mangel, Clinical Center, Pécs University, Pécs, Hungary
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.