ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1558184

ABCG2 protein expression in tumors of patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel

Provisionally accepted
Susy  ShimSusy Shim1,2*Mette  NielsenMette Nielsen3Mikkel  EldMikkel Eld4Jan  StenvangJan Stenvang5Rasmus  Froberg BrøndumRasmus Froberg Brøndum6Britta  WeberBritta Weber7Anne  Krejbjerg MotavafAnne Krejbjerg Motavaf1Morten  LadekarlMorten Ladekarl1,2*
  • 1Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
  • 2Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
  • 3Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 4Department of Pathology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
  • 5Scandion Oncology A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 6Center for Clinical Data Science (CLINDA), Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
  • 7Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background ATP-binding cassette (ABC) proteins are transmembrane efflux pumps that play a role in Multi Drug Resistance. ABCG2 and ABCB1 have been suggested as important mediators of resistance to chemotherapy (CTx) in pancreatic cancer (PC). We determined the expression of ABCG2 and ABCB1 proteins in PC and the impact of ABCG2 on outcome of treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GemNab).Materials and Methods 140 patients with sufficient tissue for assessment that had initiated palliative treatment with GemNab for non-resectable PC from 2011 to 2019 were included at two institutions. From achieved tissue, new sections were cut and stained for ABCG2 and ABCB1. Staining was evaluated by consensus of maximum score by two pathologists. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint.Results ABCB1 expression was observed in only one case (0.7%). ABCG2 was expressed in 33% but more frequently (50%) in specimens taken after gemcitabine-based (neo)adjuvant CTx (P=0.02). In multivariate analysis, ABCG2 expression was associated with an improved PFS (HR=0.64; 95%CI 0.43-0.94 (P=0.02)) of treatment with GemNab. Prior CTx, both in the (neo)adjuvant and palliative setting, was associated with shorter PFS of GemNab (P=0.03), and ABCG2 expression tended to correlate with improved PFS in these (P=0.07), but not in CTx-naïve patients (P=0.20). Similarly, a high ABCG2 expression was associated with improved overall survival (OS) only in patients with prior exposure to CTx (P=0.03). No associations of ABCG2 expression with CTx dosing or response rates were found.We found indications of upregulation of ABCG2 expression in tumors of patients previously exposed to gemcitabine, and ABCG2 expression correlated with efficacy of GemNab as assessed by PFS and OS in patients previously exposed to CTx, but not in those naïve to CTx. These findings diverge from the prevailing assumption that ABCG2 confers chemoresistance and suggest that in certain contexts, ABCG2 expression may reflect tumor adaptation or selection. Given the unexpected direction of this association, our findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, and further studies are needed to elucidate underlying biological mechanisms and validate ABCG2 as a potential predictive biomarker in this setting.

Keywords: gemcitabine, Nab-Paclitaxel, ATP-binding cassette protein, ABCG2, BRCP, chemotherapy resistance, Progression-free survival, Immunohistochemistry

Received: 09 Jan 2025; Accepted: 21 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Shim, Nielsen, Eld, Stenvang, Brøndum, Weber, Motavaf and Ladekarl. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Susy Shim, Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, 9100, Denmark
Morten Ladekarl, Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, 9100, Denmark

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.