ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Radiation Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1563919
The Impact of Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Agents on Radiotherapy Dose Calculation and Radiobiological Effect Predictions in Central Lung Cancer
Provisionally accepted
- Northern Theater Command General Hospital, Shenyang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Accurate dose calculation algorithms are critical for optimizing radiotherapy outcomes. This study evaluates and compares dosimetric differences and predictions of Tumor Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) between the Analytic Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm in lung cancer radiotherapy, under both contrast-enhanced and non-contrast enhanced CT conditions.Twenty patients with centralized lung cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique, including two patients with small cell lung cancer and 18 with non-small cell lung cancer, were selected to undergo CT scanning with and without contrast. Multiple dosimetric parameters were calculated for both algorithms under enhanced and non-contrast enhanced CT conditions. TCP and NTCP were assessed for critical organs such as the lungs, heart, and esophagus.Results: Significant differences were observed in dosimetric values between the AAA and AXB algorithms.For the minimum dose (PTV_Min), the AAA algorithm yielded higher values under enhanced CT conditions (4427 cGy) compared to non-contrast enhanced CT (3872 cGy), whereas AXB showed 4248 cGy (enhanced CT) and 3762 cGy (non-contrast enhanced CT). For maximum dose(PTV_Max),The AAA algorithm showed 6430 cGy (enhanced CT) compared to AXB's 6541 cGy (p < 0.0001).The mean dose (PTV_Mean) was 5674 cGy for AAA vs. 5640 cGy for AXB (p = 0.0042). TCP analysis showed that AAA predicted higher TCP values across both imaging conditions, with a 0.69% difference between AXB_C_Dm and AXB_C_Dw under enhanced CT (p = 0.0011). NTCP for lung radiofibrosis was 20.42% higher with the AAA algorithm, suggesting increased risk.The AAA algorithm tends to overestimate both tumor control and normal tissue complications, while the AXB algorithm provides more conservative estimates. These findings highlight the importance of algorithm choice in optimizing treatment planning and minimizing adverse effects in radiation therapy.
Keywords: Central lung cancer1, radiotherapy3, Iodine ion contrast4, AXB algorithm5, AAA algorithm
Received: 20 Jan 2025; Accepted: 10 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Shang, Xu and Yan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Defu Yang, Northern Theater Command General Hospital, Shenyang, China
Ying Yan, Northern Theater Command General Hospital, Shenyang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.