ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Breast Cancer

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1564238

This article is part of the Research TopicOxidative Stress in Breast CancerView all 5 articles

Association between Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio and Female Breast Cancer: An observational study from the NHANES 2001-2018

Provisionally accepted
Juan  XiongJuan Xiong1Deju  ZhangDeju Zhang1Jing  WuJing Wu2Donghai  ShiDonghai Shi1Xiaolan  ZhouXiaolan Zhou1Ying  YuanYing Yuan1*Chuntao  QuanChuntao Quan1*Ni  XieNi Xie1*
  • 1Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • 2Shenzhen Hospital, Peking University, Shenzhen, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: In the 21st century, breast cancer is the most frequent malignant tumor threatening women's health. Previous research has confirmed that inflammatory response processes play key roles in tumor occurrence, development, and metastasis. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an emerging disease biomarker, has become a focus of cancer research. However, analysis of the relationship between NLR and breast cancer remains scarce. Therefore, our study explored NLR levels in relation to female breast cancer (FBC) prevalence.We analyzed data from 15,313 adult females aged 20 and above, using the 2001 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We explored the association between NLR and FBC prevalence using multiple statistical approaches, including descriptive analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and subgroup analyses. We applied Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) to measure model performance.Additionally, smooth curve fitting examined the potential non-linear relationship. To validate our findings, an independent external validation dataset comprising 250 participants (50 breast cancer cases and 200 controls) from Shenzhen Second People's Hospital was utilized, and correlation between NLR values and breast cancer prevalence was calculated.Results: NLR was positively associated with FBC prevalence among US women. In the fully adjusted model, each unit NLR elevation increased FBC prevalence odds by 14% [OR = 1.14 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.22)]. Participants in the highest quartile of NLR had 67% higher FBC prevalence compared to those in the lowest quartile [OR = 1.67 (95% CI: 1.24, 2.24)], with statistical significance across three models at P for trend values <0.001. Based on AIC and BIC criteria, multivariable-adjusted models showed superior fit over unadjusted ones for both continuous and categorical NLR specifications. Subgroup analysis showed the positive association between NLR and breast cancer prevalence was consistent across the general population. External validation confirmed robustness, demonstrating positive associations between elevated NLR and breast cancer prevalence.In the U.S. adult female population, NLR levels were positively correlated with breast cancer prevalence. External validation in Chinese clinical participants supported the generalizability of these findings across different populations.

Keywords: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, NHANES, Female breast cancer, AIC/BIC, Cross-sectional study

Received: 21 Jan 2025; Accepted: 16 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xiong, Zhang, Wu, Shi, Zhou, Yuan, Quan and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Ying Yuan, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
Chuntao Quan, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
Ni Xie, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.