ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1567317

This article is part of the Research TopicEvidence-Based Research and Clinical Application of Adverse Reactions and Management Strategies for Cancer Treatment DrugsView all 3 articles

Cyclophosphamide for anticancer therapy-induced interstitial lung disease in the modern era: a retrospective cohort study

Provisionally accepted
Honami  KataharaHonami KataharaKaede  BabaKaede BabaHiromichi  NakajimaHiromichi Nakajima*Chikako  FunasakaChikako FunasakaChihiro  KondohChihiro KondohYoichi  NaitoYoichi NaitoHibiki  UdagawaHibiki UdagawaKohei  ShitaraKohei ShitaraTomoaki  SasakiTomoaki SasakiToshikatsu  KawasakiToshikatsu KawasakiToru  MukoharaToru Mukohara
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) is a serious complication of cancer treatment that is primarily treated with corticosteroids. However, effective standardized regimens for corticosteroid-refractory DIILD have not been established. Cyclophosphamide (CPA) is an immunosuppressant that is potentially effective against DIILD, but supporting evidence is limited, particularly for diseases induced by novel chemotherapeutic drugs. In this study, we examined the efficacy and safety of CPA in corticosteroid-refractory DIILD caused by various anticancer drugs.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent CPA therapy for corticosteroid-refractory DIILD at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between January 2013 and October 2023. Corticosteroid-refractory DIILD was defined as cases of DIILD classified as grade ≥3 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0, in which no improvement was observed within 48 hours after initiating corticosteroid therapy. The primary endpoint was 30-day survival post-CPA. The secondary endpoints included radiological improvements and changes in oxygen supplementation.Results: Fifteen patients (median age 73 years; 80% male) were included in the analysis. Patients were classified into molecular-targeted drugs (MT; 20%, 3/15), MT + cytotoxic drugs (33%, 5/15), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) ± cytotoxic drugs (27%, 4/15), and cytotoxic drugs alone (20%, 3/15) groups. The overall 30-day survival rate was 47% (7/15). Improvement of oxygen demand allowed 20% (3/15) of patients to discontinue oxygen supplementation. CPA demonstrated drug class-dependent efficacy: highest in the MT group (67% survival, 2/3), less benefit in the cytotoxic drugs alone group (0% survival, 0/3). Adverse events included grade 3 anemia (n=2), grade 4 neutropenia (n=1), and grade 2 cytomegalovirus infection (n=1), with no treatment-related deaths.Conclusion: CPA exhibited potential efficacy for corticosteroid-refractory DIILD, particularly in patients with MT-induced DIILD, with manageable toxicity. The differential responses based on drug category suggest tailored approaches to DIILD management may be warranted. These findings may contribute to optimizing the management of severe DIILD during cancer treatment.

Keywords: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease, Cyclophosphamide, corticosteroid-refractory, Immune-related pneumonitis, Immunosuppressant

Received: 27 Jan 2025; Accepted: 28 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Katahara, Baba, Nakajima, Funasaka, Kondoh, Naito, Udagawa, Shitara, Sasaki, Kawasaki and Mukohara. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hiromichi Nakajima, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.