ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Molecular and Cellular Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1570121
This article is part of the Research TopicNew Insights on Sialic Acid and Sialylated Glycans in the Tumorigenic ProcessView all 7 articles
CD16 and Siglec expression refine the phenotypic heterogeneity of Steady State Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- 2Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, United States
- 3The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSCs) mediate cancer immune suppression by promoting an immunosuppressive microenvironment that inhibits effective anti-tumor immunity. However, they are still a poorly understood, heterogeneous mix of neutrophil subsets. This study aims to determine the Siglec expression profile on several neutrophil subsets and assess their immunosuppressive ability. Methods: We identified CD16 high and CD16 low neutrophil subsets from the low-density fractions of human peripheral blood and compared them to high-density neutrophils. We profiled the expression of the entire family of Siglecs on these three key neutrophil populations under steady state conditions in healthy subjects as well as cancer patients. Moreover, the ability of these populations, isolated from healthy subjects, to suppress T cell proliferation was assessed. Results: Two distinct sub-populations were investigated within the low-density fraction of human peripheral blood (CD15 + CD66b + CD16 low and CD15 + CD66b + CD16 high ) and compared to highdensity neutrophils (CD15 + CD66b + CD16 high ). We found that in addition to CD33 (Siglec-3), Siglec-5/-14, -7, and -9, are differentially expressed on the low-density CD16 low and CD16 high subsets in both healthy, steady state subjects, and cancer patients. Upregulated expression of CD33 on the CD16 low cells led to the initial speculation that they are MDSCs. As the differential expression of Siglec-9 between these two populations was striking, we used CD16 and Siglec-9 double staining to quantify these populations, which demonstrated that the CD16 low Siglec-9 low population is greatly upregulated in cancer patients. The CD16 high low-density and high-density neutrophils, but not the CD16 low low-density neutrophils from healthy subjects, inhibited T cell proliferation, indicating that the CD16 low Siglec-9 low population are not MDSCs. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that Siglecs are differentially expressed on neutrophil subsets, and along with CD16, may be used to help further define what is a PMN-MDSC. Consistent with current observations by others, PMN-MDSCs may encompass an array of neutrophil subtypes, including low-density neutrophils, and point to the need for more work to precisely define the genetic signatures of PMN-MDSCs.
Keywords: Siglec, MSDC, Lectin, Immune suppresion, Neutrophil
Received: 02 Feb 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 St. Laurent, Jame-Chenarboo, Beck, Stubblefield, Duan, Sigal and Macauley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Darren Sigal, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, 92037, California, United States
Matthew S Macauley, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.