Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Radiation Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1572725

Quality of Life in Patients with Pan-Cancer Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Bibliometric Analysis (1995-2024)

Provisionally accepted
Ao  ShenAo Shen1Fan  PanFan Pan2Dingrong  FanDingrong Fan3Yidi  WangYidi Wang4Kailin  TangKailin Tang5Ying  CaiYing Cai1Hengyu  ZhouHengyu Zhou1*
  • 1School of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,, Chongqing, China
  • 4Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 5Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Chemoradiotherapy is a therapeutic approach that prolongs survival but may simultaneously negatively affect the quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients.Current research on quality of life (QOL) in pan-cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) lacks systematic integration of bibliometric findings with clinical symptom data.: We retrieved 2762 articles from the Web of Science Core Collections. R-bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace were employed to conduct quantitative analysis and visualise research trends and factors influencing QOL. Complementarily, a cross-sectional study of 117 cervical cancer patients assessed symptom prevalence via CTCAE v5.0, with symptom clusters identified. Results: The included articles were published between 1995 and 2024. The results revealed that the United States and China had the largest number of publications worldwide. Van Berge Henegouwen was the most productive author. The institution leading in this field was the University of Toronto. The International Journal of Radiation Oncology -Biology -Physics was the most productive journal. In addition, keywords with high burst strengths in recent years were 'open label', 'predictor', and'preoperative chemoradiotherapy'. Tree-ring map of terms related to QOL was visualised and multiple clusters were found, respectively named as "malnutrition", "watch and wait", and so on. Clusters analyses of specific cancers were performed to reveal these unique differences. Finally, among cervical cancer patients, decreased appetite (79.5%), diarrhea (65.8%), and altered taste (59.0%) were the most prevalent symptoms, with three symptom clusters identified.: More attention was paid to long-term outcome and patient experience during treatment. Through pan-cancer research and in-depth analysis of specific cancers, we have identified various factors affecting QOL in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy, including treatment methods, treatment-induced symptoms, psychological factors and so on , enabling us to tailor more personalized treatment plans that improve their overall well-being and enhance QOL during and after treatment.

Keywords: Bibliometric, Chemoradiotherapy, Quality of Life, Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), oncology

Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 22 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Shen, Pan, Fan, Wang, Tang, Cai and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hengyu Zhou, School of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.