Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Radiation Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1576458

Autologous Platelet-Rich Gel versus Vitamin B12 for the Treatment of Grade III-IV Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Malignant Tumor Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Provisionally accepted
Haiyun  TaoHaiyun TaoChun  XiongChun XiongLanju  TanLanju TanNa  XieNa XieJiaxin  ChenJiaxin ChenHuadong  XieHuadong XieWenjun  LeWenjun LeHengcheng  ZhongHengcheng ZhongWeiming  LiangWeiming Liang*Yongqi  ShenYongqi Shen
  • Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background:Acute radiation-induced dermatitis (ARD) remains the most prevalent adverse event associated with radiotherapy;however, effective management options remain limited.This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous platelet-rich gel(APRG) versus vitamin B12 in the treatment of grade III to IV acute radiation dermatitis in patients with malignant tumors. Materials and methods:40 patients diagnosed with Grade III–IV acute ARD were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the APRG group (n = 20) or the vitamin B12 This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article group (n = 20). All patients received wound cleansing prior to intervention. In the APRG group, the prepared gel was sprayed onto the wound surface, which was then covered with sterile Vaseline gauze and a secondary dressing for 2 to 3 days. In the vitamin B12 group, wounds were treated with a wet compress consisting of 5 mg vitamin B12 dissolved in 100 mL normal saline, applied for 30 minutes per session, three times daily. ARD severity was graded according to the RTOG criteria, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed using CTCAE v4.0 by trained oncologists. The numerical rating scale (NRS) for the topical pain and Quality of Life Instrument for Cancer Patients in China (QOL-CCC) were subjectively reported by patients. Results:The APRG group demonstrated a significant shortening in the median healing time for ARD compared to the Vitamin B12 group (3.0 days, IQR: 2.0-4.0 vs. 8.0 days, IQR: 5.0-12.0; p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients treated with APRG reported consistently and significantly lower pain levels from day 2 through day 7 post-therapy (F=24.288, P < 0.001). Superior improvements in five key quality-of-life domains—sleep, mental state, fatigue, activities of daily living, and appetite—were also observed in the APRG group (all P < 0.05). Critically, no treatment-related adverse events were recorded in the APRG group during the follow-up period. Conclusion:Our findings establish APRG as a superior and transformative intervention over Vitamin B12, demonstrating significant efficacy in accelerating wound healing, reducing pain, improving patient quality of life, and maintaining a safe treatment profile. Clinical Trail Registration:Chinese clinicaltrials.gov registry (identifier:ChiCTR2400081656)

Keywords: Acute radiation dermatitis, autologous platelet rich gel, radiation therapy, Quality of Life Instrument for Cancer Patients in China, Malignant tumors

Received: 14 Feb 2025; Accepted: 21 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tao, Xiong, Tan, Xie, Chen, Xie, Le, Zhong, Liang and Shen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Weiming Liang, liangwm22@icloud.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.