Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1578119

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based Comprehensive Model on Prediction of Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Cervical Cancer

Provisionally accepted
  • 1The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • 2Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University), Guangdong, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To develop and validate a comprehensive model integrating multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics and deep learning features for preoperative prediction of LVSI in early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: 155 patients from January 2019 to December 2023 were enrolled in this study and divided into the training and validation cohorts randomly at a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics and deep learning features were extracted from T2-weighted images (T2WI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and late contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI). Mann–Whitney U test, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) were used to select radiomics and deep learning features. Radiomics model (Rad model), deep learning model (DL model), and radiomics-deep learning model (RDL model) were derived from the training cohort using support vector machines (SVM) classifier. The prediction performances of the three models were evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA) and tested in the validation cohort. Results: The RDL model achieved predictive performance for LVSI in cervical cancer with an AUC of 0.968 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.938-0.999) in the training cohort, higher than 0.801(95% CI: 0.712-0.891) of Rad model and 0.902(95 CI: 0.845-0.959) of DL model with statistical significance after Bonferroni correction. In the validation cohort, the predictive performance of the fusion model (RDL)(AUC = 0.859, 95% CI 0.751-0.967) was significantly superior to that of the single model (AUC of DL Model = 0.745 95% CI 0.595-0.894; AUC of Rad Model = 0.686 95% CI 0.525-0.847, P < 0.001), however, the DL and radiomics models did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in performance within the validation cohort (Delong test, P>0.05). Analysis of the calibration and decision curves indicated superior predictive precision and net clinical benefit for the RDL model relative to the others. Conclusions: The advanced RDL model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy for LVSI in cervical cancer, suggesting its promising role as a noninvasive imaging biomarker. This tool could significantly enhance preoperative treatment planning by providing reliable insights without invasive procedures.

Keywords: cervical cancer, Lymph Vascular Space Invasion, Radiomics, deep learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, machine learning

Received: 17 Feb 2025; Accepted: 18 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Yi and Gong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jingshan Gong, jshgong@sina.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.