ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Radiation Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1580396
This article is part of the Research TopicRecent Advances in Radiation Oncology for the Management of Thoracic MalignanciesView all 10 articles
Impact of duration of maintenance immunotherapy on the prognosis of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy
Provisionally accepted- 1Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, Tianjin, China
- 2Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 3Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
- 4Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, Beijing Municipality, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Purpose: Chemoradiotherapy combined with consolidation immunotherapy is the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer; however, the optimal number of cycles of consolidation immunotherapy remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the optimal duration of consolidation immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy.Materials and methods: We conducted a real-world, multicenter, retrospective study of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer who underwent consolidation immunotherapy between February 2018 and December 2022 following chemoradiotherapy. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age ≥18 years and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥70; (2) histopathologically confirmed stage III non-small cell lung cancer; and (3) received consolidation immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with EGFR or ALK gene mutations; (2) history of other cancers; (3) tumor progression prior to immunotherapy; (4) immunotherapy concurrently with chemoradiotherapy; and (5) discontinuation of immunotherapy due to detection of disease progression. Univariate analysis was performed via the Cox proportional risk model. The correlations between immunotherapy duration and survival outcomes were determined via Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses. The study endpoints in this study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Results: The median number of cycles of consolidation immunotherapy was 10 (interquartile range: 4, 19). The 1-year OS rates were 91.3% and 100% for patients with ≤ 10 and >10 cycles of immunotherapy, respectively (P<0.001), and the 1-year PFS rates were 53.4% and 98.4%, respectively (P<0.001). And the 1-year OS rates of patients with ≤ 4, > 4 -≤ 10, > 10 -≤ 19, and >19 cycles of consolidation immunotherapy were 89.1%, 93.8%, 100%, and 100%, respectively (≤ 4 vs.
Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, Consolidation immunotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy duration, Disease prognosis
Received: 20 Feb 2025; Accepted: 04 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Fan, Guan, Ren, Li, Wang, Bi and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jun Wang, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
Nan Bi, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Dongcheng, 100006, Beijing Municipality, China
Lujun Zhao, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, 300070, Tianjin, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.