Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Head and Neck Cancer

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1590420

This article is part of the Research TopicBased Models and Machine Learning on CT, MRI and PET-CT in Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis, Staging and Outcome PredictionView all articles

Predictive performance of MRI and CT radiomics in predicting the response to induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A network meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Yongjie  JianYongjie Jian1Jiaxuan  PengJiaxuan Peng2Gan  YangGan Yang3Xiaojuan  HeXiaojuan He1Jing  WangJing Wang4Hui  ShiHui Shi1Qiyu  LanQiyu Lan1Zuogang  YangZuogang Yang5Zhenyu  ShuZhenyu Shu2*
  • 1The Third People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
  • 2Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 3Shehong People's Hospital, suining, China
  • 4Sichuan Nursing Vocational College, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 5Rangtang Country People's Hospital, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of different radiomics methods in predicting the response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) to induction chemotherapy (IC). Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Radiomics studies utilizing CT and MRI were included in this network meta-analysis. The quality of the studies was appraised via the PROBAST, RQS, and IBSI guidelines. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of different radiomics models were analysed. Results: Ten eligible studies involving 1550 subjects were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the radiomics models were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.75), respectively. The AUC based on the SROC curve was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.91). The predictive performance of each model was rated using SUCRA values. The MRI-based support vector machine radiomics model had the highest specificity, and accuracy, at 80.7% and 73.2%, respectively. The MRI-based SVM radiomics combined with clinical features model had the highest sensitivity (82.0%). Among the CT methods, the deep learning (DL)-based convolutional neural network model had the highest sensitivity, and accuracy, at 51.0% and 44.9%, respectively. The PROBAST showed that 7 studies were at risk for bias. Conclusion: This study synthesized existing evidence to confirm that radiomics serves as a viable exploratory tool for predicting IC efficacy in NPC. MRI-based nonlinear models and clinical-radiomics fusion models exhibit considerable promise, whereas clinical translation necessitates three critical steps: (1) standardized protocols following IBSI/METRICS/RQS guidelines; (2) prospective multicenter validation; and (3) investigating tumor microenvironment mechanisms. These measures will facilitate the transition of radiomics from technical exploration to clinical utility.

Keywords: nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Induction Chemotherapy, Radiomics, deep learning, Network meta-analysis, machine learning, Bayesian

Received: 26 Mar 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jian, Peng, Yang, He, Wang, Shi, Lan, Yang and Shu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhenyu Shu, cooljuty@hotmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.