Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Radiation Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1591420

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Institutional Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer,, Tianjin, China
  • 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
  • 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
  • 4Qingdao People's Hospital Group (Jiaozhou), Jiaozhou Central Hospital of Qingdao, qingdao, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a definitive treatment for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet optimal dose selection and prognostic factors in elderly, high-risk populations remain debated. This study evaluates long-term outcomes and predictors of survival in a real-world cohort. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 258 patients with T1-2N0M0 NSCLC treated with SBRT at Shandong Cancer Hospital (2017 – 2022). Inclusion criteria: tumors ≤5 cm, medically inoperable or surgery-refused. Survival outcomes (LC, PFS, CSS, OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. Competing risk regression (Fine-Gray model) was used for cancer-specific survival (CSS), with non-cancer deaths as competing events. Prognostic factors of OS via univariable and multivariable Cox regression. Dose fractionation was individualized (median BED₁₀=100 Gy, range: 75–144 Gy), with strict adherence to RTOG 0236 constraints, using 4D-CT for motion management and daily CBCT for image guidance. Results The cohort comprised predominantly elderly patients (median age: 73 years; 41.5% ≥75 years, 21.3% ≥80 years). At a median follow-up of 38.8 months, 5-year OS, progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), and CSS rates were 74.2%, 71.9%, 83.8%, and 84.5% respectively. Competing risks analysis revealed cumulative 5-year cancer-specific mortality of 14.1% (7.6%– 20.5%) versus non-cancer mortality of 11.6% (6.8%–16.4%). Multivariable analysis identified lower lobe lung cancer (HR=2.218, p=0.014), central tumor location (HR=2.664, p=0.003), the larger tumor length (HR=1.415, p=0.039), smoking history (HR=2.328, p=0.008) and medical inoperable (HR=2.572, p=0.007) as independent predictors of poor OS. Despite 21.3% central tumors, toxicity was minimal (grade 3 pneumonitis: 1.6%). Conclusion SBRT achieves durable survival in early-stage NSCLC at our center. Central/lower lobe tumors, bigger tumors, smoking history, and medical inoperable independently predict inferior survival, emphasizing the need for personalized dose escalation strategies or combined treatment modalities.

Keywords: stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT, Early-stage NSCLC, lung cancer, prognostic factors

Received: 11 Mar 2025; Accepted: 02 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Fu, Jigang, Li, Wang, HUANG, liu, Han, Zhang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Baosheng Li, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.