Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gynecological Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1591875

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in New Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Therapy of Gynaecological TumoursView all 5 articles

A Four-Gene Signature identified by integrated transcriptomic analysis for Differential Diagnosis and Prognosis of Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors

Provisionally accepted
Huiyi  HuHuiyi Hu1Yuanqun  ChenYuanqun Chen2Bo  HongBo Hong2Jia  LiuJia Liu1Yuchen  JiangYuchen Jiang1Zhiying  YuZhiying Yu3Zhijie  XiaoZhijie Xiao1Zhijie  XiaoZhijie Xiao1*Jing  LiJing Li2*
  • 1Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
  • 2Department of Gynecology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
  • 3Shenzhen Far East Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Uterine leiomyomas (ULM) and uterine leiomyosarcomas (ULMS) are smooth muscle tumors of the uterus that share overlapping histopathological features but exhibit markedly different biological behaviors and clinical outcomes. Whereas ULMs are benign, ULMS are rare yet highly aggressive. Clinically, accurately distinguishing tumor tissue from normal myometrial tissue remains challenging, particularly due to substantial uncertainty in preoperative diagnosis. In this study, we aim to identify molecular biomarkers capable of distinguishing uterine smooth muscle tumors (including ULM and ULMS) from normal myometrium in order to uncover driver genes involved in tumorigenesis. We analyzed RNA-seq datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) using GEO2R, Limma, and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in ULMS and ULM. Four hub genes-ABLIM1, FHL5, MAP3K8, and TOP2A-were consistently dysregulated in both tumor types relative to normal tissue, suggesting their common role in tumor development. Specifically, ABLIM1, FHL5, and MAP3K8 were downregulated, whereas TOP2A was upregulated, with further differential expression noted between ULMS and ULM. These findings were validated across independent cohorts and confirmed at the protein level via immunohistochemistry. Moreover, survival analysis revealed the prognostic significance of this four-gene signature: high TOP2A with low ABLIM1, FHL5, and MAP3K8 expression correlated with decreased overall survival in ULMS, implicating their potential role as diagnostic and prognostic markers. In conclusion, our study identifies ABLIM1, FHL5, MAP3K8, and TOP2A as key molecular drivers of uterine smooth muscle tumorigenesis. The four-gene signature shows promise as a biomarker panel for early diagnosis and differentiation between tumor and normal tissues, providing a potential molecular foundation for targeted therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: Uterine smooth muscle tumors, Transcriptome, biomarkers, early diagnosis, prognosis

Received: 11 Mar 2025; Accepted: 15 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hu, Chen, Hong, Liu, Jiang, Yu, Xiao, Xiao and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Zhijie Xiao, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
Jing Li, Department of Gynecology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.