ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gynecological Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1591923
This article is part of the Research TopicFertility preservation in female cancer survivors: innovative strategies for fertility preservation and reproductive outcomesView all articles
A long-term retrospective analysis of oncologic and fertility outcomes in cervical cancer patients undergoing radical trachelectomy
Provisionally accepted
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: We aimed to investigate the outcomes and subsequent pregnancies of early-stage cervical cancer patients who received radical trachelectomy. Moreover, there is a scarcity of literature directly comparing the impact of whether performing cervical cerclage concurrently with radical trachelectomy on patients' reproductive outcomes. Methods: Women with IA1-IB2 cervical cancer who underwent fertility-sparing surgery at our hospital were reviewed from January 2014 to May 2024. Clinical characteristics, intraoperative, pathological results, oncologic, fertility and follow-up data of these patients were recorded and retrospectively analyzed. This study compared surgical and perinatal outcomes between patients who underwent cervical cerclage during radical trachelectomy (n=49) and those who did not receive the procedure simultaneously. Results: A total of 70 women (mean age: 31years) underwent radical trachelectomy (RT) of whom 68.6% were nulliparous. The FIGO stage distribution was IA1 (n = 6), stage IA2 (n = 7), stage IB1 (n = 49), and stage IB2 (n = 8). The operative duration was significantly longer in the cerclage group than in the control group (285.4 ± 63.9 min vs 204.8 ± 61.9 min; p < 0.001, 95% CI 47.51-113.48) with greater intraoperative blood loss (201.0 mL vs 170.1 mL, p = 0.187). Overall, 36 women (51.4%) were seeking parenthood, and 26 succeeded (72.2%). There were 20 live births (76.9%), 12 women delivered in term (46.2%), 7 infants were born between 32 and 36 + 6 weeks, 1 between 28 and 31 + 6 weeks, all live birth. The mean neonatal birth weight was slightly lower in the cerclage group than in the control group (2625 g vs 2828.6 g). At the end of the follow-up period (median 68.7 months, range 34–153 months), one individual is currently 27+3 weeks pregnant, three patient had recurrence, and all women are alive and 20 children born to fertility-sparing surgery patients exhibited normal development. Conclusion: Radical trachelectomy provides excellent oncologic results with an outstanding fertility rate and obstetric outcome for patients with early cervical cancer. RT combined with intrauterine-cervical stent is a safe and effective fertility-sparing surgery but cervical cerclage is not recommended.
Keywords: cervical cancer, Fertility-sparing surgery, Radical trachelectomy, Cerclage, intrauterine-cervical stent, Pregnancy, delivery
Received: 11 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Zhang, Xin, Ding, Zhang, Zhang and Hua. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ning Zhang, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.