Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gynecological Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1592050

This article is part of the Research TopicEvidence-Based Implementation of Innovations in Gynecological OncologyView all articles

Supporting the Global Reduction of Cervical Cancer: Challenges in Colposcopy Practice and Training

Provisionally accepted
Takuma  FujiiTakuma Fujii1*Yusuke  TairaYusuke Taira2Grainne  FlannellyGrainne Flannelly3Haruki  NishizawaHaruki Nishizawa4Yoshimichi  TanakaYoshimichi Tanaka5
  • 1Department of Gynecology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ryukyu University, School of Medicine, Ginowan, Okinawa, Japan
  • 3School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
  • 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Colposcopy is an important element in the global challenge of reducing cervical cancer incidence. However, there are issues with expanding its use globally, including resources, training of colposcopists and quality assurance. This narrative review explores the role of colposcopists and the challenges of ensuring that practice and training are fit for purpose. The review found that colposcopy and colposcopists play three roles in managing cervical cancer: in diagnosis and interventions; communicating with patients; and supporting public education. It also found that colposcopy practices are evolving globally, alongside regional and national variations in vaccination, screening and treatment practices, creating important challenges. Many countries have introduced quality indicators or standards, but studies show significant variations from these in practice. Training of colposcopists also varies across regions. Some developed countries have defined curricula, but developing countries are more reliant on distance learning courses provided by international bodies. The review identified several ways to address these challenges, including setting standards for either practice or training, and training healthcare professionals from different backgrounds as colposcopists. New technologies such as artificial intelligence could also help. The review also identified some gaps in the literature, offering potential for further research. These include developing a consensus on the training needs in particular areas, and exploring how global or regional standards are applied at local levels, and how training for soft skills can best be delivered to colposcopists. It is considered essential that educational curricula should be tailored to the specific circumstances of each country or region.

Keywords: Colposcopy, cervical cancer, screening, training, Practice, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Human papillomavirus, Quality Assurance

Received: 12 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Fujii, Taira, Flannelly, Nishizawa and Tanaka. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Takuma Fujii, Department of Gynecology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.