Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Genitourinary Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1599869

This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Biomarkers and Imaging for Improved Patient OutcomesView all 14 articles

Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Unilateral Systematic Biopsy Combined with Targeted Biopsy

Provisionally accepted
Qiang  WeiQiang Wei1*Qiyou  WuQiyou Wu1Chunlei  HeChunlei He2Xiang  TuXiang Tu1Bo  ChenBo Chen1Jinjiang  JiangJinjiang Jiang1Jinbao  WangJinbao Wang1Zhouhaoran  ChenZhouhaoran Chen3Ruoxuan  LiuRuoxuan Liu3Qiaoxue  HuangQiaoxue Huang4Bo  TangBo Tang1*Jin  YaoJin Yao2*
  • 1Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 2Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
  • 3West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
  • 4Guilin People’s hospital, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: To evaluate unilateral systematic biopsy (SB) combined with targeted biopsy (TB) and assess its diagnostic accuracy in a real-world, single-centre setting.Methods: Patients with ≥1 MRI lesion who underwent both transperineal 12-core and 3-core TB were enrolled in this study. Detection rates for total prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) were compared between TB, unilateral SB+TB, and SB+TB. Pathological consistency was assessed using the kappa test, and logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors.Results: A total of 250 men were enrolled, of which 126 (50.4%) and 103 (41.2%) exhibited total PCa and csPCa, respectively. Compared to SB+TB, ipsilateral SB combined with TB (ips-SB+TB) had a comparable csPCa detection rate (99/250 vs 103/250, p=0.125), while fewer clinically insignificant PCa were detected (17/250 vs 23/250, p=0.031). In addition, ips-SB+TB demonstrated superior sensitivity for csPCa (96.1%) with an AUC of 0.98. The ips-SB+TB had a significantly higher positive core rate than SB+TB (472/2244 vs. 563/3744, p<0.001). Moreover, ips-SB+TB also had a high consistency of Gleason grade compared to SB+TB (Kappa=0.89). In the multi-lesion cohort, ips-SB+TB also had a comparable csPCa detection rate compared to SB+TB (63/128 vs. 67/128, p=0.125).Conclusions: In conclusion, our study showed that ips-SB+TB was comparable to SB+TB in detecting csPCa. The results of this study provide valuable insight into the potential of ips-SB+TB as an alternative to SB+TB.

Keywords: prostate cancer, prostate biopsy, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging utilization, unilateral index lesion, regional biopsy

Received: 25 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wei, Wu, He, Tu, Chen, Jiang, Wang, Chen, Liu, Huang, Tang and Yao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qiang Wei, Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
Bo Tang, Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
Jin Yao, Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.