ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gynecological Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1600242

Integrating Deep Learning and Clinical Characteristics for Early Prediction of Endometrial Cancer Using Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging: A Multicenter Study

Provisionally accepted
Cuiyan  LinCuiyan Lin1*Wanming  ChenWanming Chen1Jichuang  LaiJichuang Lai1Jieyi  HuangJieyi Huang2Xiaolu  YeXiaolu Ye3Sijia  ChenSijia Chen1Xinmin  GuoXinmin Guo1Yichun  YangYichun Yang3
  • 1Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, China
  • 2First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
  • 3The First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies affecting the female reproductive system. It poses significant health risks to women and imposes a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. Early and accurate diagnosis is critical for improving patient outcomes. While traditional diagnostic methods rely on clinical evaluation and imaging, there is growing interest in leveraging artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning (DL), to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Methods: This study developed a DL-based predictive model integrating multimodal ultrasound features and clinical risk factors to improve early EC diagnosis. A retrospective, multicenter analysis was conducted using 1,443 multimodal ultrasound images-including two-dimensional (2D) and color Doppler images-from 611 patients, of whom 132 were diagnosed with EC and 479 were non-EC cases. Clinical risk factors such as body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, irregular vaginal bleeding, and hypertension were identified as significant predictors (P < 0.05) and incorporated into a clinical model. Separate DL models were trained on 2D and color Doppler ultrasound images, and their performance was evaluated individually and in combination with the clinical model. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the clinical model was 0.772 (95% CI: 0.690-0.854). The 2D and color Doppler DL models achieved AUCs of 0.792 (95% CI: 0.719-0.864) and 0.813 (95% CI: 0.745-0.881), respectively. When combined with the clinical model, the merged model demonstrated superior predictive performance. In the external validation cohort, the merged model achieved an AUC of 0.892 (95% CI: 0.846-0.938), indicating high diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: The integration of multimodal ultrasound imaging and clinical risk factors using DL significantly enhances the accuracy of endometrial cancer diagnosis. The merged model demonstrated strong generalizability in external validation, underscoring its potential clinical utility.Future studies should focus on larger, prospective multicenter trials to further validate these findings and explore the implementation of this approach in personalized patient care.

Keywords: endometrial cancer, predictive model, ultrasound imaging, Clinical risk factors, deep learning

Received: 26 Mar 2025; Accepted: 19 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lin, Chen, Lai, Huang, Ye, Chen, Guo and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Cuiyan Lin, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.