BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Genitourinary Oncology
Diagnostic Accuracy of PSA Derivatives for Prostate Cancer in Patients with Low Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels
Provisionally accepted- 1People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Ürümqi, Xinjiang Uyghur Region, China
- 2Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has long been used to screen for prostate cancer (PCa), yet its low diagnostic sensitivity in the so-called PSA "gray zone" often results in overdiagnosis or missed diagnoses. This study aimed to identify reliable diagnostic markers for PCa in patients with serum PSA levels ≤10 ng/mL by comparing various PSA derivatives. Clinical data from 60 patients (PSA ≤10 ng/mL) treated between 2013 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Prostate volume was measured via suprapubic ultrasonography. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), the free-to-total PSA ratio (f/tPSA), PSA density (PSAD), and PSA-age volume index (PSA-AV). AUC values for tPSA, fPSA, f/tPSA, PSAD, and PSA-AV were 0.8301, 0.6830, 0.7225, 0.9318, and 0.9103, respectively. fPSA demonstrated the lowest diagnostic accuracy. tPSA showed moderate performance. Both PSAD and PSA-AV outperformed tPSA and f/tPSA, with positive predictive values of 89.47% and 74.07% and negative predictive values of 87.80% and 93.94%, respectively. PSAD demonstrated higher specificity (94.74%), while PSA-AV showed higher sensitivity (90.91%). PSAD appears to be a superior noninvasive diagnostic marker, while PSA-AV holds promise as an effective screening tool in patients with PSA ≤10 ng/mL. Given the small sample size, these findings should be regarded as preliminary and hypothesis-generating, pending validation in larger multicenter cohorts.
Keywords: prostate cancer, TPSA, t/fPSA, PsaD, PSA-AV
Received: 28 Mar 2025; Accepted: 30 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kadeer, Maolake, Aimaier, Abuduwaili, Ni and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Aerken  Maolake, aerkenmaolake@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
