ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1603471
Development of a predictive model for metachronous liver metastasis in gastric cancer Authers
Provisionally accepted- 1Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang, Henan Province, China
- 2Department of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University,, Xian, China
- 3Department of Gastroenterology, Pingdingshan Medical District, 989 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Force,, Pingdingshan, Henan Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Patients with metachronous liver metastasis (MLM) in gastric cancer generally have a poor prognosis. Early detection and accurate prediction of MLM are crucial for improving clinical outcomes. This study aims to identify the risk factors for MLM through clinical pathological parameters and develop a predictive model for MLM in gastric cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1248 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical surgery between December 2016 and December 2020 was conducted. Patients were randomly divided into training (70%, n=873) and validation (30%, n=375) datasets. The optimal cutoff values for the continuous variables were determined using the Youden index. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for MLM. A nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariate analysis. The model's value was validated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).Results: The incidence of MLM was comparable between the training (10.3%, 90/873) and validation set (9.9%, 37/375). The optimal cutoff value was 3.315ng/ml for preoperative AFP level, 16.275U/ml for preoperative CA125 level, 0.28010 9 /L for monocyte count and 1.43010 9 /L for lymphocyte count, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, tumor size, pathological type, surgical method, T stage, N stage, TNM stage, neural invasion, lymphatic vascular invasion, LNH, TP, HB, ALB, preoperative CEA, CA19-9, CA125, AFP levels, monocyte count, lymphocyte count, RBC count and platelet count were considered as potential variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that T stage, N stage, monocyte count, lymphocyte count, preoperative AFP and CA125 levels were independent predictive factors for MLM. The identified risk factors were further used to develop a predictive nomogram for MLM. The nomogram exhibited robust discriminatory performance, with an AUC of 0.859 in the training set and 0.803 in the validation set. Moreover, the nomogram demonstrated excellent calibration and significant clinical utility. Conclusion: This study successfully developed a predictive nomogram for MLM in gastric cancer. Besides conventional parameters, we identified and incorporated peripheral blood monocyte and lymphocyte counts as novel predictors, demonstrating their independent predictive value. Integrating these factors into nomogram could enhance predictive accuracy of MLM.
Keywords: gastric cancer, monocyte, lymphocyte, Metachronous liver metastasis, nomogram
Received: 31 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Zheng, Wu, Tian, Qiao, Dou, Dan, Ren, Niu, Wang, Duan, Yang, Zheng and Feng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jianyong Zheng, Department of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University,, Xian, China
Fan Feng, Department of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University,, Xian, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.