CORRECTION article

Front. Oncol., 06 May 2025

Sec. Hematologic Malignancies

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1603501

Corrigendum: Lipid have a direct effect on multiple myeloma: a Mendelian randomization study

Yingbin Zhong,,,Yingbin Zhong1,2,3,4Yanhao LiYanhao Li1Weipeng SunWeipeng Sun5Mingfeng Xiao,,*Mingfeng Xiao2,3,4*
  • 1Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 3Guangdong Clinical Research Academy of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 4First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
  • 5College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

A Corrigendum on
Lipid have a direct effect on multiple myeloma: a Mendelian randomization study

By Zhong Y, Li Y, Sun W and Xiao M (2024). Front. Oncol. 14:1404744. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1404744

In the published article, there was an error in the article title. Instead of “Liposomes have a direct effect on multiple myeloma: A Mendelian randomization study”, it should be “Lipid have a direct effect on multiple myeloma: A Mendelian randomization study”.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figures 27, Table 1 as published. The term “liposomes” is commonly associated with lipid-based drug delivery systems. In our study, we used it to describe the lipid profile in plasma and its potential impact on disease mechanisms, which may cause confusion. The corrected legends appear below.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. A flow-chart of MR study to explore the causal relationship between lipid and multiple myeloma.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The effect of various lipid on multiple myeloma.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The causal effect of six plasma lipid on MM risk; GCST90277317: Phosphatidylcholine (18:2_20:4) levels; GCST90277247: Sterol ester (27:1/18:3) levels; GCST90277344: Phosphatidylcholine (O-18:2_20:4); GCST90277348: Phosphatidylethanolamine (18:0_20:4); GCST90277358: Phosphatidylinositol (16:0_18:1) levels; GCST90277410: Triacylglycerol (56:4) levels.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. The funnel plot of the causal effect of six plasma lipid on MM risk. It’s almost symmetrical on both sides, which indicated no significant heterogeneity between the effect estimates of the IVs in both the IVW method and MR-Egger method.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Leave-one-out analysis of the causal association between six lipid and MM. The exclusion of individual SNPs did not result in substantial differences in the combined effect estimates between the remaining SNPs and the overall results.

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. The reverse MR analysis of MM on six plasma lipid.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Results of multiplicity and sensitivity analyses of six lipid.

“Figure 2 A flow-chart of MR study to explore the causal relationship between lipid and multiple myeloma.”

“Figure 3 The effect of various lipid on multiple myeloma.”

“Figure 4 The causal effect of six plasma lipid on MM risk; GCST90277317: Phosphatidylcholine (18:2_20:4) levels; GCST90277247: Sterol ester (27:1/18:3) levels; GCST90277344: Phosphatidylcholine (O-18:2_20:4); GCST90277348: Phosphatidylethanolamine (18:0_20:4); GCST90277358: Phosphatidylinositol (16:0_18:1) levels; GCST90277410: Triacylglycerol (56:4) levels.”

“Figure 5 The funnel plot of the causal effect of six plasma lipid on MM risk. It’s almost symmetrical on both sides, which indicated no significant heterogeneity between the effect estimates of the IVs in both the IVW method and MR-Egger method.”

“Figure 6 Leave-one-out analysis of the causal association between six lipid and MM.”

“Figure 7 The reverse MR analysis of MM on six plasma lipid.”

Table 1 Results of multiplicity and sensitivity analyses of six lipid”.

In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. The term “liposomes” is commonly associated with lipid-based drug delivery systems. In our study, we used it to describe the lipid profile in plasma and its potential impact on disease mechanisms, which may cause confusion. Therefore, we changed “Liposome” to “Lipid”. The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.

In the published article, the reference for 7-11 which discuss “liposomes” was fully relevant to “lipid” It should be removed.

In the published article, there was an error. The term “liposomes” is commonly associated with lipid-based drug delivery systems. In our study, we used it to describe the lipid profile in plasma and its potential impact on disease mechanisms.

A correction has been made to Abstract, Introduction, Materials and methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, page 01-09. This word previously stated:

“liposomes”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“lipid”

A correction has been made to Introduction. This sentence previously stated:

“Liposomes, artificial bimolecular membranes composed primarily of phospholipids and cholesterol, are endogenous substances inherent to living organisms. Their compatibility with biological tissues and non-immunogenic nature makes them an ideal medium for drug delivery. As a nanoscale drug delivery system, liposomes have garnered interest for their capacity to encapsulate drugs effectively, optimizing their distribution within the body, enhancing targeting precision, and minimizing toxic side effects. In the realm of MM therapy, liposome technology emerges as a promising avenue for developing targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing treatment efficacy while reducing drug-induced toxicity (10, 11). Recent investigations suggest a significant role for specific human serum liposome components in MM pathogenesis.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“Recent investigations suggest a significant role for specific human serum lipid components in MM pathogenesis.”

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: multiple myeloma, lipid, single nucleotide polymorphisms, Mendelian randomization, genome‐wide association study, causal relationship

Citation: Zhong Y, Li Y, Sun W and Xiao M (2025) Corrigendum: Lipid have a direct effect on multiple myeloma: a Mendelian randomization study. Front. Oncol. 15:1603501. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1603501

Received: 31 March 2025; Accepted: 17 April 2025;
Published: 06 May 2025.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Alessandro Isidori, AORMN Hospital, Italy

Copyright © 2025 Zhong, Li, Sun and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mingfeng Xiao, eGlhb21pbmdmZW5nMjAyMkAxNjMuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.