ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Head and Neck Cancer
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1606990
Real-world Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes among Elderly Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the United States
Provisionally accepted- 1Outcomes Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, United States
- 2N/A, Analysis Group (United States), Boston, United States
- 3Oncology Late Stage Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, United States
- 4Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Multimodal therapy, including resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) ± systemic therapy (ST) or definitive RT±ST, is recommended for patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC) treated with curative intent. We assessed the real-world use of treatments and associated survival among elderly patients with LA HNSCC receiving surgical or non-surgical primary treatment. Methods: Linked SEER-Medicare data were used to identify patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IVB LA HNSCC (2007-2019) who received primary treatment within 4 months after initial diagnosis. Real-world event-free survival (rwEFS) and overall survival (rwOS) from index (primary treatment initiation) were described using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Correlations between rwEFS and rwOS were investigated by normal scores rank. Landmark analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards models to compare rwOS by recurrence in the first year post-index. Results: Of 2180 patients, 626 and 1554 were categorized into the resected and unresected cohorts, respectively (median follow-up: 20.8 and 22.6 months). Overall, the mean age at diagnosis was 74.3 years, 65.9% were male. Over half (56.3%) with resected tumors received RT±ST post-surgery while 64.9% with unresected tumors received definitive RT+ST. The resected cohort had median rwEFS of 7.8 (95% CI: 6.4, 8.7) months and median rwOS of 31.4 (25.2, 40.1) months. The unresected cohort had median rwEFS of 10.0 (9.4, 10.9) months and median rwOS of 32.4 (28.5, 36.7) months. There was a significant positive correlation between rwEFS and rwOS for the resected (r [95% CI]: 0.69 [0.63, 0.73]) and unresected (0.68 [0.63, 0.73]) cohorts (both p<0.001). In the resected cohort, there was a trend of lower rwOS with recurrence first year post-index versus without recurrence (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.31 [0.96, 1.80]); in the unresected cohort, the association was significant (1.91 [1.60, 2.29]).Conclusion: In elderly patients with LA HNSCC, surgery followed by RT and definitive RT+ST were the most common treatments in the resected and unresected cohorts, respectively. The suboptimal survival highlights the unmet need for more effective therapies. The positive associations between rwEFS and rwOS in both cohorts support EFS as a predictor of OS when OS data are immature in LA HNSCC.
Keywords: max 8): event-free survival, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, locoregionally advanced, Medicare, overall survival, Real world, Treatment patterns
Received: 06 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zheng, Zhang, Bidadi, Lerman, Song, Song, Li, Zhu, Tang, Signorovitch, Merchant and Hanna. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Dandan Zheng, Outcomes Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, 07033, New Jersey, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.