ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Head and Neck Cancer

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1607280

Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck in Japan

Provisionally accepted
Ken-ichi  NibuKen-ichi Nibu1Makoto  TaharaMakoto Tahara2Noriko  YoshimiNoriko Yoshimi3Ramzi  ArgoubiRamzi Argoubi4Vanessa  Rascon- VelascoVanessa Rascon- Velasco4Makan  RahshenasMakan Rahshenas4Sarah  BobiakSarah Bobiak5Ember  LuEmber Lu5*
  • 1Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan
  • 2National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
  • 3Merck (Japan), Tokyo, Japan
  • 4Oracle Life Sciences, Oracle (United States), Austin, Minnesota, United States
  • 5EMD Serono (United States), Rockland, Massachusetts, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) data in patients with locally advanced (stage III to IVB) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN) in Japan are limited. This study describes the patient demographics and characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs among Japanese patients with newly diagnosed LA SCCHN. Methods: This longitudinal, observational, retrospective study was conducted using real-world medical claims data from the Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. database in Japan (1 January 2015 - 31 July 2022). Patients aged ≥18 years at the index date (first date of locally advanced head and neck cancer [HNC] diagnosis) and having a confirmed diagnosis of HNC during 01 January 2016 - 30 June 2021 in the oral cavity, larynx, hypopharynx, or oropharynx (based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes) were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected during the pre-index period. Treatment patterns, HCRU, and associated costs were reported during the post-index period. Results: Of the included 6741 patients with LA SCCHN, 51.3 % received definitive nonsurgical treatment, 32.4% underwent primary resection, and 16.1% did not receive any agent. The most common chemotherapy agent used for chemoradiotherapy was cisplatin (74.7%). Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil combination (TPF) was used as induction chemotherapy for 28.6% of patients who received induction treatment followed by surgery and in 55.6% of patients who received induction treatment followed by radiotherapy. Patients receiving primary resection were typically older than those receiving definitive nonsurgical treatment for each cancer site and stage. Almost all patients had ≥1 all-cause hospitalizations with substantial HCRU-associated costs. Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrates that treatment of patients with LA SCCHN in Japan often included definitive nonsurgical treatment or primary surgery. The substantial burden related to LA SCCHN-associated HCRU and considerable percentage of patients receiving no treatment highlights a need for novel and effective therapies for LA SCCHN.

Keywords: claims data, Healthcare resource utilization, head and neck cancer, Squamous cell carcinoma, Real-world data, Treatment patterns

Received: 07 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nibu, Tahara, Yoshimi, Argoubi, Rascon- Velasco, Rahshenas, Bobiak and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ember Lu, EMD Serono (United States), Rockland, 02370, Massachusetts, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.