Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Skin Cancer

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1613552

Dupilumab therapy for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid enables dual immunotherapy initiation in progressive malignant melanoma

Provisionally accepted
Janine  GrüningerJanine GrüningerSaskia  LehrSaskia LehrFrank  MeissFrank MeissDavid  RafeiDavid RafeiFranziska  SchauerFranziska Schauer*
  • Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 have transformed the treatment of malignant melanoma, significantly improving patient survival rates. However, these therapies often result in immune-related adverse events, with cutaneous toxicities being the most prevalent. One such irAE is bullous pemphigoid (BP), which is rare but challenging, and is characterised by autoantibody-mediated blistering at the dermo-epidermal junction. ICI-induced bullous pemphigoid (irBP) affects around 0.6% of patients and presents a therapeutic challenge as it requires the management of both the autoimmune response and the underlying malignancy. Recent research has highlighted the role of Th2 cytokines, particularly interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13), and eosinophils in the pathogenesis of BP and irBP. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the IL-4 receptor alpha subunit, inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signalling. In this report, we present a case of irBP in a patient with metastatic melanoma who was successfully treated with dupilumab. Following resolution of the autoimmune skin toxicity, the patient was re-challenged with dual ICI therapy (nivolumab and ipilimumab), which remains the recommended first-line treatment for metastatic melanoma. This case highlights the potential of dupilumab as a steroid-sparing option in the management of irBP, enabling continued oncological treatment.

Keywords: malignant melanoma, Eosinophilia, Immune checkpoint inhibitor, NRAS, Th2 (type-2) immune responses

Received: 17 Apr 2025; Accepted: 22 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Grüninger, Lehr, Meiss, Rafei and Schauer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Franziska Schauer, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, 79104, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.