ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Molecular Targets and Therapeutics
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1620987
A phase Ib/II study of modakafusp alfa alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors
Provisionally accepted- 1Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, United States
- 2Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, Dallas, United States
- 3University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States
- 4NEXT Oncology, San Antonio, Texas, United States
- 5Nova Oncology, McAllen, United States
- 6UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
- 7West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
- 8The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
- 9The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- 10Mary Crowley Cancer Research, Dallas, United States
- 11Medical Oncology, Advent Health, Orlando, United States
- 12Atlantic Health System, Morristown, New Jersey, United States
- 13City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, United States
- 14Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- 15Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Cambridge, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Modakafusp alfa is a novel immunocytokine comprising two attenuated interferon-ɑ2b molecules fused to an anti-CD38 IgG4 monoclonal antibody. Modakafusp alfa has shown immune cell activation and antitumor activity in preclinical mouse models, including in combination with an anti- programmed cell death (PD-1) receptor in tumors that do not express CD38, and demonstrated clinical responses and immune activation in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: In phase Ib, adult patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors received escalating doses of modakafusp alfa 0.1–1.5 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) across six dosing cohorts. In phase II, patients with unresectable/metastatic cutaneous melanoma and resistance to ≤2 anti-PD-1 therapies in the metastatic setting received modakafusp alfa 1 mg/kg Q3W in combination with pembrolizumab Q6W. Primary objectives were to determine the safety/tolerability as a single agent in phase I, and efficacy in combination with pembrolizumab in phase II. Results: Twenty-one and 24 patients were enrolled across phases Ib and II, respectively. The recommended phase II dose of modakafusp alfa was 1 mg/kg. The most common drug-related adverse events were infusion-related reactions (IRRs; 52.4%) and thrombocytopenia (28.6%) in phase Ib; and headache (58.3%), fatigue (54.2%), IRRs (41.7%), neutropenia (37.5%), and nausea (33.3%) in phase II. In phase Ib, 7 patients had a best response of stable disease (SD); in phase II, 1 patient had a confirmed complete response, 1 had a confirmed partial response, and 7 had SD. All immunogenicity-evaluable patients were anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) positive following treatment with modakafusp alfa; neutralizing ADAs were reported in 82.4% and 90.9% of patients in phases Ib and II, respectively, which was associated with drug exposure reduction. Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated innate and adaptive immune activation in peripheral blood and within tumors. Paired biopsy analysis revealed two subgroups of patients defined by differences in CD38 upregulation, accompanied by differential intratumoral pharmacodynamic changes. Correlative analysis was inconclusive. Conclusions: Modakafusp alfa induces innate and adaptive immune responses, supporting its hypothesized mechanism of action (MoA) in patients with advanced solid tumors. High immunogenicity and the potentially limited treatment effect of the IFN MoA may have contributed to limited efficacy in these patients.
Keywords: modakafusp alfa, Pembrolizumab, solid tumors, Immunocytokine, innate immunity activation
Received: 30 Apr 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gill, Cowey, Daniels, Sommerhalder, Abdul-Karim, Kirkwood, Kolodney, Mehmi, Roberts-Thomson, Strauss, Thomas, Whitman, Xing, McKean, Collins, Li, Saggu, Chen, Wang, Lewis, Parot and Johnson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: David Gill, david.gill@imail.org
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.