Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

OPINION article

Front. Oncol., 02 June 2025

Sec. Genitourinary Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1622614

Commentary: Management of non-palpable subcentimeter testicular incidentalomas

Jia You*Jia You*Gang Li*Gang Li*
  • Department of Urology, Wuhan Children’s Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Testicular tumors represent a significant pathological concern within the male reproductive system, with incidence rates exhibiting a consistent annual increase. Extensive evidence indicates a correlation between tumor size and malignant potential; lesions measuring ≥5 cm in diameter often indicate malignancy and require radical orchiectomy (1, 2). However, the clinical management of non-palpable, incidental testicular tumors measuring <10 mm remains debated, as approximately 30% are malignant (3). These asymptomatic tumors are frequently identified incidentally during ultrasonography and often associated with negative tumor markers, complicating diagnosis and potentially leading to unnecessary surgery or delayed treatment.

The recent study conducted by Bertolotto et al. (4) explores the link between growth rates and the nature of testicular incidentalomas under 10 mm, provides valuable insights into the correlation between quantitative growth kinetics and histopathological outcomes. It reveals that growth rates are crucial for distinguishing malignant from non-malignant lesions, with a size increase over 1 mm within 3 months or more than 2 mm within 6 months strongly indicating malignancy (sensitivity >90%). The study supports active monitoring of these small incidentalomas using serial high-frequency ultrasonographic rather than immediate surgical intervention, especially in younger patients, to minimize the risk of losing testicular function.

Discussion

Determining whether testicular tumors are benign or malignant before surgery is challenging and crucial for treatment decisions. Key diagnostic tools include serum tumor markers, ultrasound, and clinical features like age and symptoms. Recent studies highlight that smaller tumors are usually benign, with most small incidental lesions being non-neoplastic. Bieniek et al. (5) found only six malignant cases among 120 subcentimeter incidental lesions, all over 5 mm. Scandura et al. (6) reported two-thirds of lesions under 5 mm were benign. A recent systematic review showed about 87% of lesions smaller than 5 mm were non-malignant (3).

Despite this, balancing early detection and avoiding overtreatment is essential, as small lesions can be malignant. Malignant tumors typically grow rapidly, unlike benign or non-neoplastic lesions, which grow more slowly. The growth rate thresholds proposed by Bertolotto et al. (4), corroborated by histopathological evidence, to guide clinical decisions. Their research indicates that conservative management can avoid surgery in 70% of cases.

However, several limitations warrant consideration in this study. Firstly, only 39 of 130 lesions were histopathologically verified, with a 46% malignancy rate, and 88 lesions remained stable, indicating possible selection bias. Secondly, growth overlap in 2 of 12 non-neoplastic lesions suggests the need to consider imaging features like vascularity and calcifications for better diagnosis. Additionally, non-standardized ultrasound intervals, such as 3-month versus 6-month can impact growth rate accuracy, especially for slow-growing tumors like teratomas.

Managing testicular incidentalomas involves addressing the limitations of surveillance strategies, with patient adherence being crucial for effective monitoring. Clear communication and collaborative decision-making between clinicians and patients are essential, and strategies like personalized schedules and reminders can enhance adherence. The psychological impact of continuous monitoring, which may cause anxiety, should be addressed through psychological support. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of routine imaging, such as ultrasonography, must be carefully evaluated to balance costs and benefits. Healthcare providers must evaluate the economic impact on individual patients and overall resource allocation.

Conclusion

Implementing a structured follow-up protocol for non-palpable subcentimeter testicular incidentalomas has important implications for urologists, radiologists, and patients. Urologists benefit from a standardized surveillance protocol that guides clinical decisions and reduces unnecessary interventions. Radiologists ensure accurate imaging evaluations for early detection of changes. Clear communication with patients about the process, risks, and benefits reduces anxiety and improves adherence. By integrating these perspectives, healthcare providers can create a patient-centered approach that improves outcomes and resource utilization in managing testicular incidentalomas.

Author contributions

JY: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. GL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by funding from the Clinical Medical Research Project of Wuhan Children’s Hospital (grant number 2022FE008).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Song G, Xiong G-Y, Fan Y, Huang C, Kang Y-M, Ji G-J, et al. The role of tumor size, ultrasonographic findings, and serum tumor markers in predicting the likelihood of Malignant testicular histology. Asian J Androl. (2019) 21:196–200. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_119_18

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Dieckmann K-P, Isbarn H, Grobelny F, Dumlupinar C, Utschig J, Wülfing C, et al. Testicular neoplasms: primary tumour size is closely interrelated with histology, clinical staging, and tumour marker expression rates—A comprehensive statistical analysis. Cancers (Basel). (2022) 14:5447. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215447

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Bertolotto M, Campo I, Pavan N, Buoite Stella A, Cantisani V, Drudi FM, et al. What is the Malignant potential of small (<2 cm), nonpalpable testicular incidentalomas in adults? A systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. (2023) 9:361–70. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.10.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bertolotto M, Campo I, Freeman S, Lotti F, Huang DY, Rocher L, et al. Follow-up of non-palpable testicular incidentalomas under 1 cm: does growth rate differentiate Malignant and non-malignant lesions? Eur Radiol. (2025) 35:742–51. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10981-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bieniek JM, Juvet T, Margolis M, Grober ED, Lo KC, and Jarvi KA. Prevalence and management of incidental small testicular masses discovered on ultrasonographic evaluation of male infertility. J Urol. (2018) 199:481–6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Scandura G, Verrill C, Protheroe A, Joseph J, Ansell W, Sahdev A, et al. Incidentally detected testicular lesions <10 mm in diameter: can orchidectomy be avoided? BJU Int. (2018) 121:575–82. doi: 10.1111/bju.14056

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: testicular tumor, incidentalomas, subcentimeter, non-palpable, growth rate, management

Citation: You J and Li G (2025) Commentary: Management of non-palpable subcentimeter testicular incidentalomas. Front. Oncol. 15:1622614. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1622614

Received: 04 May 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025;
Published: 02 June 2025.

Edited by:

Salvatore Siracusano, University of L’Aquila, Italy

Reviewed by:

Nicola Pavan, University of Palermo, Italy

Copyright © 2025 You and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jia You, WW91X2ppYWFAMTI2LmNvbQ==; Gang Li, aml1amlueWlsYW5nMjAwNkAxNjMuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.