SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Molecular Targets and Therapeutics

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1624386

Efficacy and safety of Sacituzumab govitecan in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Yaping  ZhangYaping ZhangHongming  FangHongming Fang*Jian  ChenJian ChenXiaoyan  WangXiaoyan WangHui  WangHui WangXiaoli  ChenXiaoli ChenJianfeng  HongJianfeng Hong
  • Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 and is conjugated to SN-38, a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor. SG has demonstrated promising activity against various solid tumors. However, comprehensive evaluations of its efficacy and safety remain limited, and outcomes across studies have shown inconsistency. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy and associated adverse events (AEs) of SG in the treatment of solid tumors.A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm studies published up to February 14, 2025. The primary outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related AEs.Results: Five RCTs comparing SG with chemotherapy were included in the analysis. SG significantly improved OS (risk ratio [RR] = 0.720; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.587-0.882; P = 0.002), PFS (RR = 0.682; 95% CI: 0.516-0.901; P = 0.007), and DCR (RR = 1.286; 95% CI: 1.034-1.599; P = 0.024). However, higher incidences of neutropenia, leukopenia, diarrhea, and anemia were observed in the SG group.In the single-arm meta-analysis, 16 cohorts from five trials were included. The pooled ORR was 21% (95% CI: 16%-27%), DCR was 62% (95% CI: 56%-69%), and the clinical benefit rate was 33% (95% CI: 26%-39%). The median pooled PFS, duration of response, and OS were 4.41 months (95% CI: 3.61-5.22 months), 7.40 months (95% CI: 5.99-8.82 months), and 10.29 months (95% CI: 7.75-12.83 months), respectively.Although SG demonstrates superior OS, PFS, and DCR compared to chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors, this benefit is accompanied by an increased risk of specific adverse events. Subgroup analyses indicate that SG confers a more substantial clinical benefit in breast and urothelial cancers than in other tumor types.

Keywords: Sacituzumab govitecan, solid tumors, breast cancer, lung cancer, urothelial cancer

Received: 07 May 2025; Accepted: 02 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Fang, Chen, Wang, Wang, Chen and Hong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hongming Fang, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.