Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1625158

This article is part of the Research TopicRadiomics and AI-Driven Deep Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentView all 5 articles

Clinical-radiomics hybrid modeling outperforms conventional models: Machine learning enhances stratification of adverse prognostic features in prostate cancer

Provisionally accepted
Minghan  JiangMinghan Jiang1,2Mengyao  GuoMengyao Guo1Run  XuRun Xu1Zeyang  MiaoZeyang Miao1Xuefeng  LiXuefeng Li1Guanwu  LiGuanwu Li1Peng  LuoPeng Luo1*Su  HuSu Hu2,3*
  • 1Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • 2Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 3Institute of Medical Imaging, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study aimed to develop MRI-based radiomics machine learning models for predicting adverse pathological prognostic features in prostate cancer and to explore the feasibility of integrating radiomics with clinical characteristics to improve preoperative risk stratification, addressing the limitations of conventional clinical models.Methods: A retrospective cohort of 137 prostate cancer patients between January 2021 and April 2023 with preoperative MRI and postoperative pathology data was divided into adverse-feature-positive (n=85) and negative (n=52) groups. Regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on ADC and T2WI sequences, and 31 radiomics features were extracted using PyRadiomics. LASSO regression selected optimal features, followed by model construction via five algorithms (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, SVM, AdaBoost). Clinical models incorporated three variables: biopsy Gleason grade, total PSA, and prostate volume. The best-performing radiomics model was combined with clinical features to build a hybrid model. Model performance was evaluated by AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).Results: Patients were randomly split into training (n=95) and validation (n=42) cohorts. The random forest model using ADC-T2WI combined features achieved the highest AUC (0.832; 95% CI: 0.706–0.958) in the validation set, outperforming the clinical model (AUC=0.772). The hybrid model demonstrated superior performance (AUC=0.909; 95% CI: 0.822–0.995), with sensitivity=0.813, specificity=0.885, and accuracy=0.857. Calibration and DCA confirmed its robust clinical utility (p<0.01 vs. single models).Conclusions: The biparametric MRI radiomics-random forest model effectively predicts adverse pathological features in prostate cancer. Integration with clinical characteristics further enhances predictive accuracy, offering a non-invasive tool for preoperative risk stratification and personalized treatment planning.

Keywords: prostate cancer, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radiomics, machine learning, biparametric MRI

Received: 08 May 2025; Accepted: 14 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Guo, Xu, Miao, Li, Li, Luo and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Peng Luo, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
Su Hu, Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.