SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Thoracic Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1633167
This article is part of the Research TopicTailored Strategies for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in Special PopulationsView all 8 articles
The Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Treating Constipation Symptoms in Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted- Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of different nonpharmacological interventions in treating constipation symptoms in lung cancer patients through a network meta-analysis, providing evidence-based support for personalized treatment decisions in clinical practice. Methods: We retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from well-known databases and compared the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions with traditional treatments or placebos in improving constipation symptoms in lung cancer patients. The search was conducted through January 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Traditional meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted using RStudio software to integrate the data and create a network diagram to display the comparisons between nonpharmacological interventions. The credibility of the evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool. Results: A total of 33 studies involving 3,471 participants were included in this study. The traditional meta-analysis revealed that non-pharmacological interventions effectively reduced the incidence of constipation and improved constipation symptom management in lung cancer patients during treatment. Additionally, these interventions positively impacted the time to first bowel movement and reduced negative emotions (such as anxiety) in hospitalized lung cancer patients with constipation. The network meta-analysis (31 studies, 3,287 participants) indicated that acupoint stimulation was the most effective non-pharmacological intervention for reducing constipation incidence in lung cancer patients during treatment. The combined use of two types of acupoint patches showed optimal efficacy in improving constipation symptoms. However, for overall therapeutic effectiveness, the combination of acupoint patch therapy and acupoint massage most effectively reduced constipation incidence and improved overall constipation symptom management in lung cancer patients during treatment. Conclusion: The combination of acupoint patch therapy and acupoint massage is recommended as the preferred clinical intervention for treating constipation symptoms in lung cancer patients.
Keywords: lung cancer, Constipation, non-pharmacological intervention, NMA (network meta-analysis), systematic review
Received: 22 May 2025; Accepted: 25 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cai, Yin, Fang, Li, Hu, Xu and Tian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yiyong Xu, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China
Zhenzhen Tian, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.