Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1640697

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Surgical Techniques and ML/DL-based Prognostic Biomarkers for Surgical and Adjuvant Therapies of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic CancersView all 11 articles

A novel dynamic nomogram based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics for prediction of glypican-3-positive hepatocellular carcinoma

Provisionally accepted
Chunlong  ZhaoChunlong Zhao1Zheyu  ZhouZheyu Zhou2Jiarun  ZhangJiarun Zhang3Shuya  CaoShuya Cao4Jiawei  XuJiawei Xu2Cheng  WangCheng Wang2Jun  ChenJun Chen2Xiaoliang  XuXiaoliang Xu5*Chaobo  ChenChaobo Chen1*Bing  HanBing Han2*
  • 1Wuxi Xishan People's Hospital, Wuxi, China
  • 2Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China
  • 3Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
  • 4Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
  • 5The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background The 5-year overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still poor. Since glypican-3 (GPC3) is highly expressed in most HCC but not in healthy or non-malignant livers, it may become an ideal therapeutic target for HCC. Thus, this study aimed to construct a dynamic nomogram based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) radiomics for predicting GPC3 expression. Methods The medical data of consecutive HCC patients from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (from January 2020 to August 2023) were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the immunohistochemistry analysis, GPC3-positive was defined as a positive cell rate ≥ 10% (2+ and 3+). The 3D Slicer software and PyRadiomics were used to extract radiomics features on the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP). A radiomics score (Radscore) was constructed using the most predictive features identified by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to screen clinical risk factors associated with GPC3-positive. Finally, the Radscore and clinical risk factors were incorporated using logistic regression classification to construct a nomogram. Results 181 HCC patients were included according to the inclusion criteria. Among them, 106 were GPC3-positive, and 75 were GPC3-negative. Five radiomics features were finally screened, including three AP and two VP features. The nomogram model combining clinical risk factors (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] ≥ 10 ng/mL, hepatitis B virus surface antigen [HBsAg]-negative, and age) and the Radscore (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.794) was superior to the clinical (AUROC = 0.724) and radiomics models (AUROC = 0.722), with good consistency in the calibration curve. The decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the nomogram had the highest net benefit for predicting GPC3-positive. The dynamic nomogram is freely available as a mobile application at https://zheyuzhou.shinyapps.io/GPC3nomogram/. Conclusions Since the intra-tumor heterogeneity of HCC and potential complications brought by liver biopsy, our clinical prediction tool identified GPC3 status satisfactorily and might be helpful in clinical decision-making.

Keywords: Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Glypican-3, Radiomics, computed tomography, prediction

Received: 04 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhao, Zhou, Zhang, Cao, Xu, Wang, Chen, Xu, Chen and Han. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xiaoliang Xu, xuxiaoliang1990@yeah.net
Chaobo Chen, bobo19820106@gmail.com
Bing Han, hanbing_nju@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.