Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 15 August 2025

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1641188

Case Report: A rare hyperplastic polyp with synchronous high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in both glandular and squamous epithelium in autoimmune gastritis

Dian Zhang,&#x;Dian Zhang1,2†Xueqin Chen&#x;Xueqin Chen1†Maher HendiMaher Hendi3Wen Tang,Wen Tang4,5Chenfei TanChenfei Tan1Juan LiuJuan Liu1Weiling Hu*Weiling Hu1*
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China
  • 3Department of Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 4Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 5School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

A 68-year-old man came to evaluate a gastric polyp discovered during a routine gastroscopy. After endoscopic mucosal resection, pathological findings confirmed that it’s a hyperplastic polyp. Notably, squamous metaplasia was observed within the hyperplastic polyp, and both squamous and glandular epithelium exhibited high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Besides, the diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis was established by comprehensive assessment including gastric endoscopic findings, histopathological examination and serological studies. The patient experienced no postoperative discomfort and had oral medication for two weeks. In this paper, we presents a first case worldwide of hyperplastic polyp with synchronous high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in both glandular and squamous epithelium in autoimmune gastritist. In previous cases, the occurrence of hyperplastic polyps with neoplastic transformations or squamous metaplasia is very rare, but what we found this time was the concurrance of both lesions on hyperplastic polyps. This extremely rare case not only provides further clinical evidence for the metaplasia and neoplastic transformation potential of hyperplastic polyps, but also highlights the necessity of regular follow-up examination for autoimmune gastritis - a well-established precancerous condition.

1 Introduction

Autoimmune gastritis (AIG), a chronic inflammatory disease, is characterized by gastric mucosa atrophy, parietal cell destruction and intrinsic factor loss (1). The basic lesions of AIG include neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia, pyloric gland adenoma, neuroendocrine tumors (2), etc. Due to its nonspecific clinical presentation, the diagnosis is mainly relied on endoscopy, histopathology and serological studies (1). Endoscopically, autoimmune gastritis typically manifests as corpus-dominant mucosal atrophy (3). Meanwhile, hyperplastic polyps (HPs) can sometimes be observed in the stomach (2). Gastric yperplastic polyps (GHPs), predominantly located in the gastric antrum, represent benign epithelial lesions resulting from expansion and exfoliation of gastric foveolar cells (4, 5). Although long-term autoimmune gastritis is considered as precancerous disease, metaplasia or malignant transformation of hyperplastic polyps remains exceedingly rare (6).

Here, we present a rare case of gastric hyperplastic polyp with synchronous high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in both glandular and squamous epithelium in autoimmune gastritis. The lesion was accidentally discovered during a routine endoscopy. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of its kind worldwide.

2 Case description

The patient, a 68-year-old male, presented for medical consultation asymptomatically after a gastric polyp was discovered during a health check-up.

Preoperative endoscopy revealed significant atrophy of the gastric body, thinning of the gastric wall, that the mucosal folds were no longer visible after inflation, and that the vascular network was visible. Atrophy of the antrum was not obvious. On the basis of the above endoscopic findings, autoimmune gastritis was suspected (Figures 1A–C). Preoperative pathology suggested a hyperplastic polyp, and the patient was scheduled for endoscopic polypectomy. During endoscopic polyp resection, we identified a broad-based polyp approximately 1.8 cm in size in the lower part of the gastric body, with a noticeably congested and rough surface (Figure 1D). We performed endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (Figure 2). The polyp was sent for pathological examination.

Figure 1
Endoscopic images show different sections of the gastrointestinal tract. Image A displays inflamed mucosa with patchy redness. Image B reveals a tubular view of the tract with a scope visible. Image C shows normal mucosal vascular patterns. Image D features a polyp protruding from the mucosal surface.

Figure 1. (A-C) shows significant atrophy of the gastric body, thinning of the gastric wall, no mucosal folds and a visible vascular network. Atrophy of the antrum was not obvious. (D) shows a broad polyp measuring approximately 1.8 cm in size in the lower part of the gastric body, with a noticeably congested and rough surface.

Figure 2
Four-panel medical image showing a polyp removal procedure inside a colon. The top-left panel shows a polyp. The top-right panel shows a closer view. The bottom-left panel shows a medical instrument approaching the polyp. The bottom-right panel shows the site after removal.

Figure 2. Shows the procedure of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

Post-endoscopy pathology revealed a hyperplastic polyp with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the glandular epithelium, along with squamous metaplasia with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, which is very rare in the stomach (Figures 3, 4A–E). Histopathological analysis demonstrated that squamous metaplasia with malignant transformation is evident, and immunohistochemical staining shows positivity for P53. All the lesions were mucosal-confined without submucosal invasion. The base resection margins were negative. The surrounding gastric body mucosa showed atrophy, pyloric gland metaplasia, and microscopic nodular hyperplasia of neuroendocrine cells (Figures 3D, 4F). The diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis was also proved.

Figure 3
Histological images of a tissue sample in four panels labeled A to D. Panel A shows a histology section stained with hematoxylin and eosin, highlighting cellular structure in pink and purple shades. Panels B, C, and D exhibit immunohistochemical staining with different markers, displaying varying intensities of brown coloration against a pale background, indicating protein expression levels. Each panel includes a scale bar for measurement reference.

Figure 3. (A) shows a hyperplastic polyp with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the glandular epithelium, along with squamous metaplasia and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. (B) shows the abnormal expression and distribution of Ki67. (C) shows local positive expression of P63. (D) shows positive expression of CgA.

Figure 4
Histological slides showing various stages of tissue examination. Panel A shows a hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide with dense cell structures. Panels B, C, and D display slides with brown-stained cells against a lighter background, indicating different staining levels. Panel E shows concentrated cell staining in glandular structures. Panel F shows sporadic staining in a light, uneven tissue background.

Figure 4. (A) shows high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the glandular epithelium, along with squamous metaplasia and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. (B) shows the abnormal expression and distribution of Ki67. (C) shows positive expression of P53. (D) shows positive expression of P63. (E) shows positive expression of MUC5. (F) shows positive expression of CgA.

The laboratory examination revealed that pepsinogen I level had significantly decreased to 4.43 ng/mL and that his gastrin level had markedly increased to 84.1 pmol/ml. Importantly, the patient’s serum anti-parietal cell antibody (PCA) IgG level and anti-intrinsic factor antibody (IFA) IgG level elevated to 52.16 RU/ml and 47.91 RU/ml, respectively. These findings further confirmed the diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis.

The patient did not experience any discomfort after polyp removal and was treated with oral medication for two weeks after undergoing EMR. The patient is recommended to undergo a 3-month gastroscopy.

3 Discussion

Recent years have witnessed a rising prevalence of autoimmune gastritis. Characteristic endoscopic hallmarks pallor and thinning of gastric mucosal, visibility of the vascular network, and loss of gastric fold (5). As a precancerous disease of the stomach (4), autoimmune gastritis is the first progress of a multistep precancerous cascade (7).

According to statistics, hyperplastic polyps represent approximately 30-93% of gastric polyps (4). Abnormal mucosa can usually generate hyperplastic polyps, especially in autoimmune gastritis (8), which is one of the main pathologic sources of GHPs (5). Autoimmune gastritis and related diseases often trigger chronic reactive or active inflammation of mucosa, promoting pit cells expansion and subsequent polyp formation (9). Autoimmune gastritis causes atrophy of secretory acid, leading to pronounced hypergastrinemia (10, 11). Hypergastrinemia is a carcinogenic factor which may induce the development of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas. Additionally, post-injury regeneration and proliferation of mucosa contribute to polyp development. Although exact mechanism is unclear, local changes or cell mutations of origin can affect polyp growth regulation (10).

Gastric hyperplastic polyps have an extremely low probability of malignant transformation (12). Current literature reports dysplasia and malignant transformation of GHPs rates ranging from 1.9% to 19% and 0.6% to 2.1%,respectively (13). For hyperplastic polyps, actually, size larger than 1 cm are recognized as a risk factor of neoplastic transformation. Larger GHPs, higher cancerous change risk. Because persistent growth of GHPs requires sustained exposure to stimulating factors (4). In our case, 1.8 cm polyp size obviously increased the malignancy risk. Yao et al. summarized four predictors of malignancy in gastric hyperplastic polyp: well-differentiated histology, dysplasia, mucin phenotype belonging to the gastric type, and expression of P53 (14). Molecular analysis indicates that experission of p53, K-ras, microsatellite instability, p21WAF1/CIP1 and cyclin D1 might be meaningful in transformation process (15). Certain membrane proteins called claudins, which are located at intracellular junctions, are responsible for cell membrane integrity and appear to be markers of gastric hyperplastic polyp malignant transformation (14). There are evidences suggested that yperplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence is the development path of neoplastic transformation (16).

Metaplasia refers to the replacement of one differentiated cell type by another type in the same tissue. The specific metaplasia type vary by tissue origin, which is broadly classified as squamous metaplasia, intestinal metaplasia and acina-ductal metaplasia. Continued exposure to metaplasia-promoting factors may induce metaplasia advance to dysplasia and even malignancy (17). Gastrointestinal metaplasia is associated with chronic gastritis and mucosal atrophy (18). In our case, the chronic inflammation and mucosal damage induced by autoimmune gastritis may explain the occurrence of squamous metaplasia within the hyperplastic polyp. However, intestinal metaplasia remains the most common gastric metaplasia (17), whereas the squamous epithelium is quite rare (19). The underlying mechanism of gastric squamous metaplasia is still unknow. Research proposes three possible origins: squamous differentiation within pre-existing adenocarcinoma, a metaplastic squamous epithelium or nests of ectopic squamous epithelium, and undifferentiated pluripotent stem cells (18). These assumptions are supported by prior case reports documenting gastric squamous cells in patients with peptic ulcers, syphilis, gastric tuberculosis, and pernicious anemia (20, 21). Another theory suggests that squamation may arise from altered differentiation of gastric stem cells during regeneration (22). Although gastric squamous metaplasia is typically benign, rare cases may progress to squamous cell carcinoma (23).

Generally, both malignant transformation and squamous metaplasia in gastric hyperplastic polyps exhibit exceptionally low incidence rates. The coexistence of squamous metaplasia and malignant alternation is even rarer, with only a handful of cases reported in English journals to date (19). Notably, these previously reported lesions exclusively involved gastric mucosa rather than polyps.

To our knowledge, this case represents the first documented case of malignant transformation in a hyperplastic polyp exhibiting squamous differentiation. The case is extremely rare in that long-term gastric mucosal damage caused by autoimmune gastritis led to the development and subsequent malignant transformation of gastric hyperplastic polyps with a squamous morphology; notably, some squamous polyps may become cancerous.

However, there are still some shortcomings in our case report. Firstly, the preoperative biopsy identified the polyp as hyperplastic, leading to routine gastroscopy and resection without magnification. Consequently, detailed surface structure analysis was unavailable—a significant limitation. Secondly, the patient’s refusal of gastroscopy reexamination during follow-up left us unaware of the gastritis status or polyp recurrence. So we should pay enough attention to atrophic gastritis patients. These findings underscore the importance of routine magnifying endoscopy for autoimmune gastritis patients to strive for early diagnosis and treatment.

In future clinical practice, preliminary assessment of polyp nature under gastroscopy is a meaningful topic. We can proceed in the following directions: 1) Establishment of standardized magnifying endoscopy screening protocols for autoimmune gastritis patients; 2)Development of a comprehensive polyp image database for dysplastic feature analysis; 3) Creation of clinical data-driven predictive models for assessing polyp malignant transformation risks; 4) Investigation of AI-assisted diagnostic systems for early lesion detection.

4 Conclusion

In summary, this case report a highly unusual hyperplastic polyp arising in autoimmune gastritis. It highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for autoimmune gastritis during endoscopic examinations. Relevant serological testing should be performed in patients with compatible histopathological findings to confirm the diagnosis of this precancerous condition. What’s more, doctors must recognize the oncogenic potential of hyperplastic polyps, particularly their propensity for malignant transformation and squamous metaplasia, which may serve as critical transitional stages in gastric cancer. Clinicians should make comprehensive assessment, avoiding overly simplistic therapeutic approaches. Early assessment and intervention are crucial to gastric cancer prevention.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Medical Ethics Committee, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Affiliate Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

DZ: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Conceptualization, Formal analysis. XC: Supervision, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. MH: Writing – review & editing. WT: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. CT: Writing – original draft, Investigation. JL: Writing – original draft, Supervision. WH: Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Yu YF, Tong KK, Shangguan XL, Yang XY, Wu JY, Hu G, et al. Research status and hotspots of autoimmune gastritis: A bibliometric analysis. World J Gastroenterol. (2023) 29:5781–99. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i42.5781

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Coati I, Fassan M, Farinati F, Graham DY, and Genta GM. Rugge M.Autoimmune gastritis: Pathologist’s viewpoint. World J Gastroenterol. (2015) 21:12179–89. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12179

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kamada T, Watanabe H, Furuta T, Terao S, Maruyama Y, Kawachi H, et al. Diagnostic criteria and endoscopic and histological findings of autoimmune gastritis in Japan. J Gastroenterol. (2023) 58:185–95. doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01954-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yang H, Yang WJ, and Hu B. Gastric epithelial histology and precancerous conditions. World J Gastrointest Oncol. (2022) 14:396–412. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i2.396

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Markowski AR, Markowska A, and Guzinska-Ustymowic K. Pathophysiological and clinical aspects of gastric hyperplastic polyps. World J Gastroenterol. (2016) 22:8883–91. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i40.8883

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Cockburn AN, Morgan CJ, and Genta RM. Neuroendocrine proliferations of the stomach: a pragmatic approach for the perplexed pathologist. Adv Anat Pathol. (2013) 20:148–57. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31828d185d

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Shah SC, Piazuelo MB, Kuipers EJ, and Dan L. AGA clinical practice update on the diagnosis and management of atrophic gastritis: expert review. Gastroenterology. (2021) 161:1325–1332.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.078

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Karpińska-Kaczmarczyk K, Lewandowska M, Białek A, Ławniczak M, and Urasińska E. Gastric hyperplastic polyps coexisting with early gastric cancers, adenoma and neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. Pol J Pathol. (2016) 67:33–8. doi: 10.5114/pjp.2016.59474

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Forté E, Petit B, Walter T, Lépilliez V, Vanbiervliet G, Rostain F, et al. Risk of neoplastic change in large gastric hyperplastic polyps and recurrence after endoscopic resection. Endoscopy. (2020) 52:444–53. doi: 10.1055/A-1117-3166

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Waldum H and Fossmark R. Gastritis, gastric polyps and gastric cancer. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:6548. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126548

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hu H, Zhang Q, Chen G, Pritchard DM, and Zhang S. Risk factors and clinical correlates of neoplastic transformation in gastric hyperplastic polyps in Chinese patients. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:2582. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58900-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Castro R, Pimentel-Nunes P, and Dinis-Ribeiro M. Evaluation and management of gastric epithelial polyps. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. (2017) 31:381–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.06.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Goddard AF, Badreldin R, Pritchard DM, and Walker MM. Warren B british society of gastroenterology. Manage Gastric Polyps Gut. (2010) 59:1270–6.

Google Scholar

14. Imura J, Hayashi S, Ichikawa K, Miwa S, Nakajima T, Nomoto K, et al. Malignant transformation of hyperplastic gastric polyps: An immunohistochemical and pathological study of the changes of neoplastic phenotype. Oncol Lett. (2014) 7:1459–63. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.1932

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Jain R and Chetty R. Gastric hyperplastic polyps: a review. Dig Dis Sci. (2009) 54:1839–46. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0572-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Terada T. Malignant transformation of foveolar hyperplastic polyp of the stomach: a histopathological study. Med Oncol. (2011) 28:941–4. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9556-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Giroux V and Rustgi AK. Metaplasia: tissue injury adaptation and a precursor to the dysplasia-cancer sequence. Nat Rev Cancer. (2017) 17:594–604. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.68

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Yamada R, Horiguchi SI, Shimizuguchi R, Nakano N, Motoi T, Monma K, et al. A first case of primary gastric verrucous carcinoma with isolated squamous epithelium in the stomach. Virchows Archiv. (2019) 475:115–9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02542-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Jeon MS, Kim GH, Park DY, Jeong JH, Kahng DH, Jang HY, et al. A case of squamous metaplasia of the stomach. Clin Endosc. (2013) 46:407–9. doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.4.407

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ahn S, Bae GE, and Kim KM. Exuberant squamous metaplasia of the gastric mucosa in a patient with gastric adenocarcinoma. Diagn Pathol. (2015) 10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13000-015-0281-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Iwamuro M, Fujii N, Tanaka T, Kanzaki H, Kawano S, Kawahara Y, et al. Metaplasia of the stomach associated with lymphoma infiltration. Intern Med. (2021) 60:2229–34. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6271-20

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wood DA. Adenoacanthoma of the pyloric end of the stomach: a consideration of its histogenesis and a report of two cases. Arch Pathol. (1943) 36:177–89.

Google Scholar

23. Oono Y, Fu K, Nagahisa E, Kuwata T, Ikematsu H, Yano T, et al. Primary gastric squamous cell carcinoma in situ originating from gastric squamous metaplasia. Endoscopy. (2010) 42(Suppl 2):E290–1. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255807

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: autoimmune gastritis, hyperplastic polyp, squamous epithelium, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, precancerous condition

Citation: Zhang D, Chen X, Hendi M, Tang W, Tan C, Liu J and Hu W (2025) Case Report: A rare hyperplastic polyp with synchronous high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in both glandular and squamous epithelium in autoimmune gastritis. Front. Oncol. 15:1641188. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1641188

Received: 04 June 2025; Accepted: 16 July 2025;
Published: 15 August 2025.

Edited by:

Babak Pakbin, Texas A and M University, United States

Reviewed by:

Li Weiwei, Shaoxing People’s Hospital, China
Rafael Barreto-Zuniga, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico

Copyright © 2025 Zhang, Chen, Hendi, Tang, Tan, Liu and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Weiling Hu, aHV3ZWlsaW5nQHpqdS5lZHUuY24=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.