REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1641752
This article is part of the Research TopicSynergistic Effects of PDT and RT in Cancer Treatment: Innovations and ChallengesView all articles
CHEMOTERAPEUTIC NANOPARTICLES FOR GLIOBLASTOMA
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy
- 2Istituto Nazionale Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani, Rome, Italy
- 3Universita degli Studi di Firenze Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
- 4Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Sezione di Firenze, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Therapeutic agents into the brain are a major challenge for treatment of brain cancer due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that prevents many drugs from reaching the brain. The deadliest form of brain cancer is glioblastoma (GBM), and its current standard treatment involves surgical removal of the tumor, followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The main limitations of chemotherapy for brain tumors are BBB permeability, lack of specificity, and potential damage to healthy tissue.Enhanced molecular understanding of the underlying glioblastoma pathogenesis doesn't lead to better therapeutic options. The emergence of nanotechnologies offers a promising solution, as controlled drug delivery using nanoparticles to bypass the BBB. Nanoparticles embrace a wide range of synthetic and natural biological materials effective in enhancing diagnostic and therapeutic efforts, alone or in combination with immunological, genetic, or cellular therapies. Lipid-based, inorganic, and polymeric nanoparticles are on the cutting edge of precision medicine for cancer as both therapeutic and diagnostic tools. Currently, there is no consensus on the most effective nanoparticle formulation for treating brain tumors, including their size, composition, targeting, and drug delivery mechanisms.Nanoparticles also have some drawbacks, including uncertain toxicity, reproducibility, and high cost.This short review provides a selection of primary research on nanoparticles as delivery chemotherapeutic systems, with a highlight on Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiotherapy (RT) combinatorial modalities.Here we critically examine the most significant research findings in the field of nanomedicine as applied to glioblastoma therapy, with a particular emphasis on chemotherapeutic nanoparticle (NP)based drug delivery. In parallel, we provide an overview of the physicochemical properties of nanoparticles, informed by recent advances in their engineering, with a special focus on combinatorial strategies involving photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiotherapy (RT). Our analysis focuses on highly potent anticancer drugs that are well characterized in terms of their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The latest developments in immunotherapy and molecular-targeted treatments are intentionally excluded. Our viewpoint is grounded in the conventional yet highly effective chemotherapy-based delivery approach, which remains widely used against many of the most lethal human cancers. Despite being underrepresented in current literature, this strategy holds strong potential for clinical translation and competitiveness.
Keywords: Nanoparticles, delivery, Glioblastoma, chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, PDT
Received: 05 Jun 2025; Accepted: 22 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Messina, Zuchegna and Bruzzi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Samantha Messina, Department of Science, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.