ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Thoracic Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1647649
This article is part of the Research TopicReal-World Data and Real-World Evidence in Lung Cancer Volume IIView all 6 articles
Comparative Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy versus Observation in Stage IB Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Real-World Analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, tianshui, China
- 21st Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- 3Department of Thoracic Surgery, People 's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
- 4Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya, China
- 5Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The value of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapyadjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in stage IB squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) remains controversial. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients with surgically resected stage IB SqCC between January 2013 and August 2024. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival data were collected. To mitigate the impact of observed confounders, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using clinically relevant covariates, including age, sex, tumor diameter, poor differentiation, spread through air spaces, visceral pleural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion, resulting in 46 well-matched patient pairs. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 181 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 50 patients (27.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), while 131 patients (72.4%) were assigned to the clinical observation (CO) group. The ACT group had more patients <65 years (P=0.007), larger tumors (P<0.001), and more poorly differentiated tumors (P=0.017) compared with the CO group. The two groups were comparable after PSM. Among the ACT group, twenty-eight (56%) patients received cisplatin plus docetaxel regimen. 16% (8/50) of patients took cisplatin plus gemcitabine regimen, and carboplatin plus paclitaxel was 14 (28%) patients' option. The median follow-up time was 60 months (range: 5-137 months). The 5-year DFS rates were 84.8% in the ACT group and 85.6% in the CO group (HR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.44-2.51; P=0.919). There was no statistically significant difference in DFS between groups, both in the entire cohort 3 (P=0.701) and the matched cohort (P=0.665). The 5-year OS rates were 96.8% in the ACT group and 93.1% in the CO group (HR: 2.46, 95% CI 0.72-8.35; P=0.150). No statistically significant difference in OS was observed, either in the overall cohort (P=0.131) or in the matched cohort (P=0.300). Conclusions: ACT may not confer significant survival benefits in resected stage IB SqCC, with comparable disease-free and overall survival outcomes observed between treatment and observation groups.
Keywords: Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapyAdjuvant therapy, Squamous cell carcinoma, Stage IB, overall survival, Disease-Free Survival
Received: 16 Jun 2025; Accepted: 23 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liang, Fu, Guo, Zhang, Liang, Zhang, Zhao, Gao, Yang and Shen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Leilei Shen, drshenats@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.