Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Hematologic Malignancies

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1647730

Application of Radiomics model Based on FDG-PET/CT for the Assessment of Therapeutic Effect in Patients with Newly-diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Provisionally accepted
Fukai  LiFukai Li1Fei  LiFei Li2Xiaodan  XuXiaodan Xu1Qingyang  YuQingyang Yu1Guangwen  DuanGuangwen Duan1Jiayang  YanJiayang Yan1Baiyang  JiangBaiyang Jiang1Hongbiao  SunHongbiao Sun1Shaochun  XuShaochun Xu1Xiang  WangXiang Wang1*Yi  XiaoYi Xiao1*Shiyuan  LIUShiyuan LIU1*
  • 1Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Department of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives To evaluate the prediction value of radiomics models based on FDG-PET/CT for the therapeutic effect in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging data of 165 MM patients. Randomly divided into a training set (n=133) and a test set (n=32) at a ratio of 8:2. All patients underwent whole-body PET-CT scans within one month prior to the commencement of treatment. Overall response rate was the principal efficacy endpoint, including stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), disease stabilization (SD), and disease progression (PD). Deep response (DR) was defined as sCR, CR, and VGPR, while non-deep response included PR, MR, SD and PD, 74 patients attained DR. Different models involving clinical, radiomics extracted from PET/CT, and their combination were constructed based on multiple logistic regression and logistic regression machine learning classifier after features selection, respectively. The models predicting performance were evaluated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and F1 score. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curves, calibration curves, and DeLong's test were applied to compare their ability. Results Gender was the only one of clinical characteristics found to be independent prognosis factor for treatment evaluation, with a p-value of 0.041. The radiomics models outperformed the Clinical model significantly, among which the PET-CT model yielded the best results with the AUC of 0.809. The PET + CT + Clinical model achieved the optimal performance after integrating clinical and radiomic features, with the AUC of 0.813. Conclusions The FDG-PET/CT-based radiomics model, particularly when integrated with clinical features, can more effectively predict deep treatment response in newly diagnosed MM patients, offering significant clinical utility for early treatment stratification and personalized therapeutic guidance.

Keywords: Multiple Myeloma, Therapeutic assessment, Radiomics, PET/CT, deep response

Received: 16 Jun 2025; Accepted: 16 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Li, Xu, Yu, Duan, Yan, Jiang, Sun, Xu, Wang, Xiao and LIU. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xiang Wang, radiologywangx@163.com
Yi Xiao, czyyxiaoyi@163.com
Shiyuan LIU, shczyylsy0925@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.