Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Radiation Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1648847

This article is part of the Research TopicRadiation Spatial Fractionation—A novel approach to integrate Physics, Biology, and Immunology for high therapeutic index radiotherapyView all 6 articles

Initial experience of spatially fractionated lattice radiation therapy for palliative treatment of pediatric bulky tumors

Provisionally accepted
Hualin  ZhangHualin Zhang1,2*Kenneth  WongKenneth Wong1,2*Arthur  OlchArthur Olch1,2*Hye Ri  HanHye Ri Han2*Brittney  ChauBrittney Chau2Lauren  LukasLauren Lukas1,2Eric  L ChangEric L Chang1,2
  • 1Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
  • 2University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Purpose: Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) has demonstrated high clinical response rates with minimal toxicity in adult patients with bulky tumors, including radioresistant 5 histologies. However, there is limited clinical data on SFRT in pediatric patients, and optimal techniques and dose regimens remain unclear. This study presents our single-institution experience with SFRT for the palliative treatment of bulky pediatric tumors. Methods and Materials: A retrospective review was conducted on six pediatric patients with metastatic or unresectable bulky tumors treated with SFRT. SFRT was delivered using VMAT in 10 the form of Lattice Radiation Therapy (LRT). SFRT fraction doses ranged from 10–15 Gy, with 7– 26 high-dose vertices per treatment. Sequential conventional external beam radiation therapy was delivered in 6 courses (67%), and SFRT was used for re-irradiation in 3 courses (33%). A radiobiological modeling approach was employed to estimate treatment effects across varying cancer and normal cell radiosensitivity levels. 15 Results: Six pediatric and young adult patients (median age: 10 years) received in total 9 SFRT courses. Tumor sites included the liver (4), abdomen (3), pelvis (1), and thorax (1), with a median gross tumor volume of 666 cc. Median follow-up was 1.7 months. Tumor volume reductions were observed in 67% of treated sites (mean reduction: 279.3 cc), with significant clinical improvements in symptoms (e.g., pain, gastrointestinal symptom relief) and no grade 3 or higher 20 toxicities. Radiobiological modeling data indicates that SFRT improves the therapeutic ratio, particularly when cancer cells are radioresistant and surrounding normal tissues are radiosensitive. Increasing the number of high-dose cores may further enhance this ratio Conclusions: SFRT seems to be a safe and effective palliative treatment for pediatric bulky tumor patients in our preliminary study. Radiobiologic modeling suggests that increasing the density 25 of high-dose cores can enhance the therapeutic ratio, potentially reducing normal tissue toxicity.

Keywords: spatially fractionated radiation therapy, SFRT, Pediatric patient, Bulky tumor, heterogeneous dose

Received: 17 Jun 2025; Accepted: 12 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Wong, Olch, Han, Chau, Lukas and Chang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Hualin Zhang, hualin.zhang@med.usc.edu
Kenneth Wong, kewong@chla.usc.edu
Arthur Olch, aolch@chla.usc.edu
Hye Ri Han, hyeri.han@med.usc.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.