ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Radiation Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1650377
This article is part of the Research TopicAI-Based Prognosis Prediction and Dose Optimization Strategy in Radiotherapy for Malignant TumorsView all 13 articles
Exploring the Prognostic Value of EBV DNA in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy Using AI-Based Modeling
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Oncology, the Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
- 2School of Clinical Medicine, Sichuan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mianyang, China
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chengdu, China
- 4Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a well-established biomarker in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but its integration into artificial intelligence (AI)-based prognostic tools remains limited. This study aimed to develop and validate AI models incorporating EBV DNA load levels to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced NPC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).A retrospective multicenter cohort of 503 patients was divided into training (n = 301) and validation (n = 202) sets. Four machine learning algorithms-Cox regression, LASSO, RSF, and GBM-were applied to predict 1-and 1.5-year PFS in patients with advanced NPC. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and interpretability tools such as SHAP values and partial dependence plots (PDP).The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 100.0%, 91.5%, and 88.6% in the EBV = 0 group; 99.4%, 91.2%, and 88.5% in the > 0 and < 1500 group; and 92.3%, 81.0%, and 75.7% in the ≥ 1500 group, respectively, with statistically significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.0024). The RSF model outperformed other models with the highest C-index (0.778) and area under the ROC curve of 0.810 and 0.634 at 1 and 1.5 years, respectively. EBV DNA emerged as the most influential predictor across all interpretability analyses. Patients with EBV DNA ≥1500 copies/ml had the poorest predicted survival, showing a distinct threshold effect in the PDP.High EBV DNA levels were associated with poorer PFS in advanced NPC. Among the models evaluated, the RSF model demonstrated the best predictive performance and interpretability. EBV-informed AI modeling represents a promising approach for enhancing individualized risk prediction and clinical decision-making in NPC.
Keywords: EBV DNA, Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Prognostic value, artificial intelligence, machine learning, Chemoradiotherapy
Received: 19 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Shang, Lu, Li, Li, Xu, Wang, Su, Qin, Lang and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jie Zhou, Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chengdu, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.