Abstract
Objective:
Salidroside, a bioactive compound derived from Rhodiola, has been demonstrated to upregulate the tumor suppressor miR-1343-3p, leading to suppression of gastric cancer growth. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying salidroside-mediated regulation of lipid metabolism via miR-1343-3p and its downstream mRNA targets remain poorly understood.
Methods:
The interaction between miR-1343-3p and ACOT11 was evaluated through Pearson correlation analysis, sequence-based binding site alignment, and RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays. The effects of salidroside treatment on cell proliferation, gene and protein expression, downstream metabolites, and energy production were assessed through a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments, including the CCK-8 assay, colony formation assay, RT-qPCR, Western blot, ELISA, cell transfection, and xenograft tumor models.
Results:
The expression of miR-1343-3p is negatively correlated with ACOT11 mRNA, which is closely associated with lipid metabolism. Salidroside significantly inhibits the proliferation of gastric cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner. Compared to untreated controls, salidroside-treated gastric cancer cells showed decreased ACOT11 mRNA/protein expression but increased miR-1343-3p levels. This was accompanied by elevated substrate fatty acyl-CoA concentrations with concurrent reductions in acetyl-CoA, FFA, and ATP. ACOT11 is a downstream target of miR-1343-3p, up-regulating miR-1343-3p expression reduces ACOT11 expression, while down-regulating miR-1343-3p expression increases ACOT11 expression. In vivo, salidroside significantly inhibited tumor growth in gastric cancer xenograft models.
Conclusions:
We demonstrate that salidroside exerts anti-proliferative effects in gastric cancer by targeting the miR-1343-3p/ACOT11/FFA lipid metabolism signaling pathway, disrupting cancer cell energy production. These regulatory factors hold promise as novel therapeutic targets for gastric cancer.

Salidroside, an extract of Rhodiola, upregulate miR-1343-3p transcription, leading to the targeted down-regulation of ACOT11 expression. This results in the accumulation of fatty acyl-CoA, reduced hydrolysis, decreased production of FFA and acetyl-CoA, interference with lipid metabolism and energy production in gastric cancer cells, and ultimately inhibits the proliferation of gastric cancer cells.
1 Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) represents a leading cause of global cancer-related morbidity and mortality, accounting for substantial disease burden worldwide. Current surveillance statistics classify GC as China’s fifth most common cancer diagnosis and third leading contributor to cancer mortality, underscoring its disease burden (). The limited durability of therapeutic response and poor target specificity of conventional chemotherapeutics contribute substantially to tumor recurrence and metastatic progression, ultimately driving unfavorable patient survival outcome. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify potential drug targets to improve the prognosis of GC patients.
Salidroside, the main active component of the Tibetan medicine Rhodiola (), has been shown to possess various effects, including immune regulation, hypoxia inhibition, metabolic suppression, anti-aging, anti-diabetic, and anti-tumor properties (–). As a multi-effect and multi-target biological regulator, salidroside has been confirmed to exert anti-tumor effects by inducing cancer cell apoptosis and cell death. For example, salidroside can promote apoptosis of human gastric cancer AGS cells by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (), inhibit gastric cancer progression by inhibiting sugar fermentation, or inhibit gastric cancer proliferation () and inhibit the occurrence and development of gastric cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis (). However, the other potential anti-tumor mechanisms of salidroside in GC, such as lipid metabolism, remain to be fully elucidated.
Recent studies have revealed that reprogramming lipid metabolism plays a crucial role in the proliferation and migration of cancer cells, and its lipid metabolites can also alter the tumor microenvironment (). Research has shown that abnormal lipid metabolism plays an important role in the development and progression of GC, participating in cancer cell membrane biosynthesis, forming signaling pathways, promoting protein-protein interactions, and facilitating angiogenesis and tumor metastasis (). As a critical energy source for cells, lipids fuel tumor cell metabolism, reshape the tumor microenvironment, and suppress immune cell activity. Additionally, they contribute to drug resistance in cancer cells, thereby driving GC progression, invasion, metastasis, and rapid proliferation (, ). Especially fatty acids can provide energy for tumor cells and participate in the biosynthesis of cell membrane lipids and signal transduction molecules (). Mesenchymal stem cell-induced lncRNA Hcp 5 drives fatty acid oxidation through miR-3619-5p/AMPK/PGC1α/CEBPB axis, promoting chemotherapy resistance in GC cells, indicating that targeting Hcp 5 is a new approach to enhance the efficacy of GC chemotherapy drugs (). Thus, elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying dysregulated lipid metabolism in GC progression is crucial for understanding its proliferative and metastatic behavior—and for advancing targeted therapeutic strategies.
Advances in molecular biology have revealed that miRNA-mediated lipid metabolism reprogramming in GC cells regulates key signaling pathways, driving tumor proliferation and migration (). Recent research has discovered that fatty acid amide hydrolase promotes GC progression by regulating arachidonoylethanolamide/lysophosphatidic acid signaling and activating the cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin E2 axis. Further studies have revealed that miR-1275 may indirectly regulate these lipid signaling pathways by targeting fatty acid amide hydrolase, thereby influencing GC progression (). Research indicates that the Human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen complex p5 acts as a molecular sponge for miR-3619-5p, leading to the upregulation of PPARG coactivator 1 alpha. This promotes the formation of the PGC1α/CEBPB transcriptional complex, which transcriptionally induces carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1, thereby enhancing fatty acid oxidation and driving gastric cancer progression (). These findings suggest that lipid metabolism reprogramming is intricately and closely linked to the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of GC, involving multiple signaling pathways regulated by key enzymes associated with abnormal lipid metabolism. Fundamentally, in cancer cells, lipid metabolism reprogramming appears to be driven by miRNA-mediated dysregulation of key metabolic enzymes (). Therefore, identifying critical miRNA-regulated enzymes in lipid metabolic reprogramming is essential for elucidating GC progression and developing targeted therapies.
The tumor suppressor miR-1343-3p is a short non-coding RNA that mediates post-transcriptional gene regulation through targeted mRNA binding, thereby controlling mRNA stability and translation (). Our previous research has shown for the first time that salidroside exerts potent anti-tumor effects by selectively upregulating miR-1343-3p, such as leading to direct suppression of oncogenic MAP3K6 and MMP24 signaling pathways and consequent inhibition of GC progression (). There are also studies showing that as an anti-cancer factor, miR-1343-3p can inhibit the expression and activation of the GC oncogene TEA domain transcription factor 4 (TEAD4) (). However, the key nodes of lipid metabolism and gene regulatory mechanisms by which salidroside inhibits GC growth remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigates miR-1343-3p as a central regulator to identify salidroside’s key lipid metabolism targets in GC. By elucidating the miR-1343-3p/ACOT11/FFA signaling axis, we aim to uncover novel mechanistic insights and advance targeted therapeutic strategies for GC treatment.
2 Methods
2.1 Cell culture and solution preparation
The human GC cell line MGC-803 was purchased from Nanjing Biory Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). The MGC-803 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Evergreen, China) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Hyclone, USA). The human GC cell line AGS was purchased from Suzhou Haixing Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, China). The AGS cells were cultured in Ham’s F12K medium (Haixing, China) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Haixing, China) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Hyclone, USA). All cells were maintained in a humidified incubator (Thermo, USA) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. When the cells reached approximately 80-90% confluency, they were detached using 0.25% trypsin (Vivocell, China) for subculturing or plating. All experimental procedures were performed within 8 passages of the cells.
Salidroside (Solarbio, China) was dissolved in RPMI-1640 medium at concentrations of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 μmol/mL for MGC-803 cells subsequent experiments and dissolved in Ham’s F12K medium at concentrations of 0.01, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.08 μmol/mL for AGS cells subsequent experiments. The group without salidroside treatment served as the control group.
2.2 CCK-8 and colony formation assays
In a 96-well plate, 100 μL of GC cells at a density of 0.25×104 were evenly seeded per well. After the cells adhered, salidroside was added at concentrations of section 2.1 , respectively. The cells were then cultured for an additional 24 and 48 hours, after which CCK-8 (Boster, China) reagent was added to assess the viability of GC cells treated with different drug concentrations. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Thermo, USA), and the results were calculated and plotted. Cell viability was assessed using the following formula. Cell viability (%) = (absorbance of the experimental group/absorbance of the control group) ×100%.
In a 12-well plate, 100 μL of GC cells at a density of 300 were evenly seeded per well. After the cells adhered, salidroside was added at concentrations of 4, 6, and 8 μmol/mL for MGC-803 cells. After 48 hours, the medium was replaced, and the cells were cultured for an additional 1–3 weeks or until the majority of individual clones contained more than 50 cells. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature, stained with 0.1% crystal violet staining solution, washed several times with PBS, air-dried, photographed, and the colonies were counted.
2.3 Prediction of miR-1343-3p-lipid metabolism target mRNAs
In the MGC-803 cells sequencing RNA database previously established by the research group, miR-1343-3p-mRNA target gene comparisons were integrated with GO and KEGG enrichment analyses. The associations between them were assessed using Pearson correlation and gene locus analysis (details on the database, https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2024.2322206, establishment and methodology can be found in prior research ()). GEPIA database (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) analysis of acyl-CoA thioesterase 11 (ACOT11) expression in GC tissue.
2.4 RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation assay
The target protein antibody IP group and the negative control IgG group were set up. An appropriate amount of Protein A/G Agarose (40 μL, Beyotime, China) was added, washed, and resuspended using NT2 Wash Buffer (Beyotime, China). Then, ACOT11 (2 μg, a mouse antibody of Santa, USA, cat. No. sc-398738) and Mouse IgG (2 μg, Beyotime, China, cat. No. A7028) were added separately, followed by incubation at room temperature for 30 minutes. After centrifugation at 4 °C, 1000 g for 1 minute, the supernatant was discarded to obtain pre-bound Protein A/G Agarose. Cells were lysed using Lysis Buffer (Beyotime, China), and a portion of the supernatant (10% cracking solution from a RIP reaction) was taken as Input for subsequent detection. The remaining supernatant was added to the pre-bound Protein A/G Agarose and incubated on a shaker at 4 °C for 4 hours. An appropriate amount of Elution Buffer (Beyotime, China) was then added and mixed, followed by incubation at 55 °C for 30 minutes. After incubation, total RNA was extracted using Trizol (AG, China). The extracted RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a reverse transcription kit (Sparkjade, China). Finally, the miR-1343-3p gene fragment was amplified using SYBR Green qPCR Mix (Sparkjade, China), and gene expression levels were detected. The reverse transcription conditions for miR-1343-3p were as follows: 25 °C for 5 minutes, 50 °C for 15 minutes, and 85 °C for 5 minutes. The qPCR conditions were: 94 °C for 3 minutes, 94 °C for 10 seconds and 60 °C for 30 seconds, followed by 40 cycles. The melting curve was collected using the instrument’s default program (Bio-Rad, USA). The 2-△△Ct method was used to calculate the enrichment fold of miR-1343-3p in RIP relative to the negative control. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
| Gene | Primer sequences (5’→3’) |
|---|---|
| miR-1343-3p | F: CGCGGCCTTAATGCTAATTGTGA R: AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT |
| ACOT11 | F: TGACAAGTTCCTCTCCTTCCACATG R: TGGCGTCGTCCTCGTCTACC |
| U6 | F: GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT R: CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT |
| GAPDH | F: TGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAGCAG R: GTGTCGCTGTTGAAGTCAGAGGAG |
qPCR primer sequences.
2.5 Real-time RT-PCR
The method for total RNA collection and the detection of miR-1343-3p and ACOT11 expression levels were performed as described from 2.4. U6 and GAPDH were used as internal references for miR-1343-3p and ACOT11, respectively. The reverse transcription conditions for ACOT11 were as follows: 50°C for 15 minutes and 85°C for 5 seconds. The 2-△△Ct method was used to calculate the relative expression levels of each gene. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1.
2.6 Western blot
Collect the supernatant of the culture medium (store in a -80°C freezer for future use). After fully lysing the cells using RIPA Lysis Buffer (Beyotime, China), after centrifugation at 4 °C, 12000 g for 5 minutes, the protein supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was measured using a BCA protein assay kit (Boster, China). Protein samples were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% BSA solution (Solarbio, China) for 2 hours. Primary antibodies, including ACOT11 (1: 2000, a rabbit antibody of Proteintech, China, cat. No. 10776-1-AP) and GAPDH (1: 1250, Boster, China, cat. No. BM3874), were incubated with the membrane at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, secondary antibodies, Rabbit (HRP) (1: 10000, abcam, USA, cat. No. ab6721), were incubated with the membrane at room temperature for 2 hours. The ultra-sensitive ECL chemiluminescence reagents A and B (Kermey, China) were mixed in a 1: 1 ratio and applied to the membrane. The membrane was then visualized and imaged using a chemiluminescence gel imaging system (Bio-Rad, USA).
2.7 Detection of fatty acyl-CoA, acetyl-CoA and free fatty acid concentration
Following the instructions of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (MEIMIAN, China), the absorbance of fatty acyl-CoA (FA-CoA) and acetyl-CoA (A-CoA) in the cell supernatant under different treatments (Collected in Method 2.6) was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader, and the sample concentration was calculated according to the standard curve formula, all tests were repeated three times. In accordance with the free fatty acid assay kit (Nanjingjiancheng, China) instructions, the absorbance of free fatty acids (FFA) in the cell supernatant under different treatments was measured at 546 nm using a microplate reader. FFA was evaluated using the following formula. ×Ccalibration×1000. CCalibration: Standard concentration, 1.04 mmol/L.
2.8 Detection of ATP concentration
Collect GC cells at 80-90% confluence, seed them evenly in six-well plates, and after cell attachment, add drug-free medium (control group) and low, medium, and high-dose salidroside (4, 6, and 8 μmol/mL salidroside solutions for MGC-803 cells, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.08 μmol/mL salidroside solutions for AGS cells ). After fully lysing the cells using the ATP assay lysis buffer from the ATP detection kit (Beyotime, China), the supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 4 °C, 14000 g for 10 minutes. In an opaque black 96-well plate, 100 μL of ATP detection working solution was added to each well and allowed to stand at room temperature for 3–5 minutes. Then, 20 μL of the sample or standard was added to each well, mixed thoroughly, and the relative luminescence units were measured using a multifunctional cell imaging detection system (Biotek, USA). The sample concentration was calculated based on the standard curve formula.
2.9 Cell transfection
miR-1343-3p mimic, NC mimic, miR-1343-3p inhibitor, NC inhibitor, si-ACOT11 and si-NC (Biomics, China) were transfected into MGC-803 cells using Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen, USA). Primer sequences are listed in Table 2. The final concentrations for transfection were 50 nM for miR-1343-3p mimic and NC mimic, and 100 nM for miR-1343-3p inhibitor, NC inhibitor, si-ACOT11 and si-NC. When combined with salidroside, the concentration of salidroside used was the IC50 value.
Table 2
| Gene | Primer sequences (5’→3’) |
|---|---|
| miR-1343-3p mimic/miR-1343-3p agomir | sense: CUCCUGGGGCCCGCACUCUCGCUU antisense: AAGCGAGAGUGCGGGCCCAGGAG |
| NC mimic | sense: UCACAACCUCCUAGAAAGAGUAGA antisense: UCUACUCUUUCUAGGAGGUUGUGA |
| miR-1343-3p inhibitor | antisense: AAGCGAGAGUGCGGGCCCCAGGAG |
| NC inhibitor | antisense: UCUACUCUUUCUAGGAGGUUGUGA |
| si-ACOT11 | sense: GAGAGAUCACCAAGGUGAAdTdT antisense: UUCACCUUGGUGAUCUCUCdTdT |
| si-NC | sense: UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUdTdT antisense: ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAAdTdT |
Cell transfection primer sequences.
2.10 Xenograft tumor model
This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xizang Minzu University, with approval number 2024-014. The animal experiments complied with the ARRIVE guidelines. The animals used in this study were SPF-grade nude mice, female, 4 weeks old, with a body weight of approximately 15–20 grams, purchased from Jiangsu Huachuang Xinnuo Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu, China), with a production license number of SCXK (Su) 2020–0009 and an animal qualification certificate number of 320928240100203557. The entire breeding process strictly adheres to SPF-grade animal facility operating standards, with free movement, feeding, and drinking. Environmental parameters are maintained at a temperature of 22 ± 1°C, humidity of 55 ± 5%, and a 12-hour light/dark circadian rhythm.
After one week of acclimatisation under identical conditions and locations, the nude mice were randomly divided into three groups: the model control group, the salidroside group, and the miR-1343-3p overexpression group (primer sequences are listed in Table 2), with 5 mice in each group and a total of 15 mice. Following the ear tag order, the left axillary skin of the nude mice was disinfected with 75% ethanol, and a suspension of MGC-803 cells (2×106 cells/mouse) was subcutaneously injected into the left axillary. Observe tumor formation in nude mice, measure tumor volume using vernier calipers, and initiate drug administration when the tumor volume reaches approximately 100 mm3.The model control group and the salidroside group were intraperitoneally injected with saline (0.2 mL/20g) and salidroside (100 mg/kg, dissolved in saline), respectively, administered every 2 days. The miR-1343-3p over-expression group received local administration of miR-1343-3p agomir (3 mg/kg, Biomics, China, primer sequences are listed in Table 2) at the tumor site, twice a week. Tumor volume (V=0.5×L×W2) was calculated weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. After 4 weeks, the nude mice were euthanized painlessly, and the tumor tissues were weighed.
2.11 Statistical methods
The experimental data of IC50 were analyzed and plotted using GraphPad Prism 9.5 software (https://www.graphpad.com/) and other experimental datas were analyzed and plotted using R version 4.2.1 (https://www.r-project.org/). The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between two groups were performed using the t-test. For comparisons among multiple groups, if the data met the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance, One-way ANOVA was used; if the data met normality but not homogeneity of variance, Welch’s one-way ANOVA was applied. A P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*P< 0.05, **P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001). All the tests were performed three times.
3 Results
3.1 Salidroside inhibited the viability and proliferation of GC cells
To determine the inhibitory effects of salidroside on GC cell viability and proliferation, we performed CCK-8 and colony formation assays. CCK-8 viability assays revealed that salidroside exerted anti-proliferative effects in GC cells. In MGC-803 cells, treatment with 6-10 μmol/mL salidroside for 24 hours significantly reduced cell viability, while extended 48-hour exposure demonstrated enhanced efficacy, showing significant growth inhibition across all tested concentrations (2-10 μmol/mL). In AGS cells, treatment with 0.01-0.08 μmol/mL salidroside for 24 hours significantly reduced cell viability, while extended 48-hour exposure demonstrated enhanced efficacy. The results demonstrate that the inhibitory effect of salidroside was more potential at 48 hours compared to 24 hours (Figure 1A). Therefore, based on the IC50 concentrations of salidroside treatment in MGC-803 cells (8.69 μmol/mL) and AGS cells (0.065 μmol/mL) at 48 hours (Figure 1B), we selected salidroside concentrations of 4, 6, and 8 μmol/mL (low, medium, and high-dose salidroside groups) for treating MGC-803 cells and 0.02, 0.04, and 0.08 μmol/mL (low, medium, and high-dose salidroside groups) for treating AGS cells for 48 hours as the conditions for subsequent experiments. The colony formation assay results demonstrated that the colony formation rate significantly decreased in the treated group, demonstrating potent anti-proliferative effects (Figure 1C). These results demonstrate that salidroside suppresses GC cell viability and proliferation in time- and dose-dependent manners.
Figure 1
3.2 Screening of target genes: identifying key lipid metabolism effectors influencing GC cell proliferation
Previous research results indicated that a total of 1873 miRNAs were expressed based on high-throughput sequencing results. Compared with the control group, there were significant differences in the expression levels of 44 miRNAs after treatment with salidroside (absolute difference fold ≥ 2, P<0.05). Among them, the tumor suppressor factor miR-1343-3p is nearly non-expressed in the control group of MGC-803 cells but is significantly upregulated after treatment with salidroside (). Through integrated bioinformatic analysis combining miRNA-mRNA target prediction, Gene Ontology (GO) annotation, and KEGG pathway enrichment (), three lipid metabolism-related target mRNAs were identified to be negatively regulated by miR-1343-3p (Figure 2A). Among these, ACOT11—a key enzyme for FFA production—showed the highest expression in MGC-803 cells and was downregulated by over 2-fold after salidroside treatment (Figure 2B). Further analysis using the GEPIA database (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) revealed that, compared to normal tissues, ACOT11 is highly expressed in GC tissues (Figure 2C). Therefore, we identified ACOT11 as a key target closely associated with miR-1343-3p regulation and significantly downregulated, showing a negative correlation with miR-1343-3p expression. Further Pearson correlation and gene locus analyses demonstrated that ACOT11 and miR-1343-3p have specific binding sites and a clear association in MGC-803 cells (Figure 2D). RIP experiments revealed that the relative expression level of miR-1343-3p in the IP group was significantly higher than that in the IgG group, indicating that miR-1343-3p was significantly enriched in the ACOT11 immunoprecipitation samples. This suggests that ACOT11 may be regulated by miR-1343-3p, thereby affecting lipid metabolism and tumor progression (Figure 2E). These findings suggest that salidroside likely inhibits GC cell proliferation by down-regulating ACOT11 through miR-1343-3p targeting, thereby interfering with lipid metabolism and energy production in GC cells.
Figure 2
3.3 Salidroside upregulates miR-1343-3p expression, down-regulates ACOT11 expression, and inhibits lipid metabolism and energy production in GC cells
RT-qPCR was used to validate the changes in gene expression of miR-1343-3p, ACOT11, and other target molecules in GC cells following salidroside intervention. The results showed that, compared to the control group, the expression level of miR-1343-3p was upregulated, while the mRNA expression level of ACOT11 was downregulated in GC cells treated with salidroside (Figure 3A). Western blot analysis was performed to assess salidroside-induced alterations in ACOT11 expression and its downstream signaling effectors in GC cells. The results indicated that, compared to the control group, the protein expression level of ACOT11 was reduced in GC cells treated with salidroside (Figure 3B). To verify the effects of salidroside treatment on lipid synthesis and energy levels in GC cells, ELISA, microplate assay, and luciferase assay were used to measure the relative concentrations of fatty acyl-CoA, acetyl-CoA, FFA, and ATP in GC cells after salidroside intervention. The results revealed that, compared to the control group, the concentration of fatty acyl-CoA increased, while the concentrations of acetyl-CoA and FFA significantly decreased, and ATP concentrations were reduced in GC cells treated with salidroside (Figure 3C). Once the concentration of fatty acyl-CoA don’t change, FFA and acetyl-CoA may also remain unchanged, which illustrates the importance of the substrate fatty acyl-CoA. Collectively, these data demonstrate that salidroside disrupts lipid metabolism and impairs energy homeostasis in GC cells through miR-1343-3p-mediated suppression of ACOT11.
Figure 3
3.4 Salidroside inhibits GC cell proliferation in vitro through modulating miR-1343-3p/ACOT11/FFA lipid metabolism signaling pathway
To further investigate the effect target of ACOT11 on miR-1343-3p and determine the miR-1343-3p/ACOT11/FFA lipid metabolism signaling pathway as a potential effect target of salidroside’s anti-tumor effect, miR-1343-3p mimic and miR-1343-3p inhibitor were designed and transfected into GC cells. After 48 hours of transfection, CCK-8, colony formation, RT-qPCR, western blot, ELISA, microplate assay, and luciferase assays were performed to assess the effects of miR-1343-3p over-expression or inhibition on cell proliferation. Additionally, the ACOT11 expression level and associated metabolic impacts were examined via enzymatic measurement of fatty acyl-CoA, and downstream products acetyl-CoA and FFA in human GC cells. The results demonstrated that miR-1343-3p expression was significantly upregulated in GC cells transfected with the miR-1343-3p mimic compared to the NC mimic group, confirming efficient transfection (Figure 4A). Conversely, transfection with miR-1343-3p inhibitor in GC cells resulted in significant downregulation of miR-1343-3p expression in both the miR-1343-3p inhibitor group and Salidroside+miR-1343-3p inhibitor group (Figures 4B, 4C). Following transfection with the miR-1343-3p mimic, miR-1343-3p expression level was markedly elevated in GC cells (Figure 5A), whereas both mRNA and protein levels of ACOT11 were significantly suppressed (Figures 5B, C). The accumulation of fatty acyl-CoA resulted in diminished FFA production, accompanied by reduced intracellular FFA concentrations and impaired ATP generation (Figure 5D), culminating in the suppression of GC cell proliferation (Figure 5E). Conversely, Following transfection with the miR-1343-3p inhibitor, miR-1343-3p expression was significantly suppressed in GC cells (Figure 6A), while the gene and protein expression of ACOT11 was significantly upregulated (Figures 6B, C). The reduction of fatty acyl-CoA led to elevated FFA biosynthesis, resulting in increased intracellular FFA accumulation and subsequent augmentation of ATP production (Figure 6D), promoting GC cell proliferation (Figure 6E).
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
siRNA targeting ACOT11 (si-ACOT11) was designed and transfected into GC cells using lipofection. After 48 hours of transfection, RT-qPCR was performed to assess ACOT11 expression levels. The results demonstrated successful transfection, with both the si-ACOT11 and Salidroside+si-ACOT11 groups showing significant downregulation of ACOT11 expression compared to the si-NC and Salidroside+si-NC control groups (Figure 7). When GC cells were transfected with si-ACOT11 to knock down ACOT11, the expression of miR-1343-3p remained unchanged (Figure 8A), while the gene and protein expression of ACOT11 was significantly downregulated (Figures 8B, C). The accumulation of fatty acyl-CoA led to diminished free fatty acid (FFA) biosynthesis, resulting in decreased intracellular FFA accumulation and subsequent impairment of ATP generation (Figure 8D), consequently, the metabolic disruptions inhibited GC cell proliferation (Figure 8E). As shown in Figure 6, the combination of salidroside and miR-1343-3p inhibitor reversed the inhibitory effect of salidroside on metabolism and anti-proliferative effects in GC cells. As shown in Figure 8, the combined treatment of salidroside and si-ACOT11 synergistically enhanced the observed effects in GC cells, resulting in more significant metabolic and anti-proliferative outcomes. Our comprehensive bidirectional in vitro experimental results demonstrate that salidroside mediates downregulating ACOT11 by upregulation of miR-1343-3p, leading to the accumulation of fatty acyl-CoA, reduced production of downstream products acetyl-CoA, FFA, and ATP, interference with lipid metabolism and energy production in GC cells, and ultimately inhibiting the growth of GC cells.
Figure 7
Figure 8
3.5 Salidroside inhibits GC cell proliferation in vivo through the miR-1343-3p/ACOT11/FFA lipid metabolism signaling pathway
In vivo experiments using tumour-bearing nude mice confirmed that salidroside and over-expressed miR-1343-3p have a certain inhibitory effect on GC cells (Figure 9A). Tumor volume and weight were significantly reduced in all salidroside treatment groups relative to controls (Figure 9B), demonstrating superior anti-tumour effect. Compared to the control group, salidroside treatment resulted in increased expression levels of miR-1343-3p (Figure 9C), while ACOT11 was downregulated at both the transcription and protein levels (Figures 9D, E). The treatment induced significant fatty acyl-CoA accumulation while concurrently reducing acetyl-CoA and FFA levels, ultimately leading to impaired ATP generation (Figure 9F). Furthermore, after overexpressing miR-1343-3p, the gene and protein expression levels of ACOT11 and the production of downstream metabolites were consistent with the aforementioned results. The in vivo experimental results indicate that salidroside regulates ACOT11 through miR-1343-3p to inhibit lipid metabolism and proliferation in tumour tissues.
Figure 9
4 Discussion
GC is the most common malignant tumor of the digestive system, primarily associated with genetic factors (family history, especially first-degree relatives), poor lifestyle habits (obesity, smoking, sedentary behavior, high-sugar and high-fat diets), environmental factors (geographical distribution, soil, and water quality), chronic inflammatory stimulation, and Helicobacter pylori infection (, ). Clinical follow-up data demonstrate a striking disparity in 5-year survival outcomes: while early-stage GC patients exhibit favorable prognosis with >90% survival, advanced-stage patients show markedly poorer outcomes (<30% survival) even with surgical intervention (). Due to the hidden and lack of specific signs in early-stage GC, invasive and radiation-based diagnostic methods such as endoscopic biopsy and imaging, along with the low sensitivity of traditional tumor markers like carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), result in low detection rates (–). Consequently, most patients (>70%) are diagnosed beyond the early stage, often at an advanced stage, missing the optimal timing and methods for treatment, and ultimately relying on chemotherapy and radiotherapy (). Despite the availability of multiple chemotherapeutic regimens for GC, their clinical utility remains limited by transient therapeutic responses and high rates of tumor recurrence/metastasis, which collectively contribute to poor long-term survival outcomes. Salidroside, the primary active component of Rhodiola, has been shown to inhibit GC growth (). Salidroside is a multi-effect, multi-target biological regulator that influences multiple signaling targets and biological effects, thereby modulating the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of various cancers (). However, research on salidroside’s regulation of non-coding RNAs in tumor progression remains limited. Our study demonstrates through both in vivo and in vitro experiments that salidroside treatment significantly upregulates miR-1343-3p in GC cells. This up-regulation leads to targeted suppression of ACOT11 gene and protein expression, resulting in decreased hydrolysis of the fatty acyl-CoA substrate (with consequent accumulation), reduced generation of FFA and acetyl-CoA, and markedly diminished ATP production. These metabolic changes ultimately inhibit lipid metabolism and proliferation in GC cells.
Recent studies have found that abnormal lipid metabolism reprogramming provides nutrients and energy for tumors, primarily by increasing fatty acid uptake and synthesis to promote rapid cancer cell growth (, ). For instance, ATP citrate lyase and fatty acid synthase are often found overexpressed in gastric cancer tissues, where increased expression of these genes facilitates fatty acid synthesis, providing essential energy and structural support for tumor cell growth (). Furthermore, studies have observed enhanced activity of key regulatory factors in fatty acid metabolism, such as sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1, in gastric cancer cells, which further promotes lipid synthesis and cellular proliferation1 (). These alterations in gene expression not only reshape the metabolic state of tumor cells but may also influence immune cell function by modifying lipid components within the tumor microenvironment, thereby fostering cancer progression (). Dysregulated lipid metabolism can also alter cell membrane composition, gene expression, signaling pathway activity, and downstream cellular functions, directly influencing cancer development and progression (). Advances in molecular biology and metabolomics have revealed that cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis are closely linked to non-coding RNAs and lipid metabolism. Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) is a hypothesized mechanism of mutual regulation between RNA molecules through shared miRNA response elements. miRNAs, as core components of ceRNA regulation, can act as tumor suppressors or oncogenes, modulating lipid metabolism in tumor tissues. Their aberrant expression plays a critical role in GC development, influencing processes such as proliferation, migration, and apoptosis (, ). For example, Hcp5 sponges miR-3619-5p and upregulates PPARGC1α, increasing the transcriptional complex PGC1α/CEBPB to induce CPT1 transcription, thereby promoting fatty acid oxidation and GC progression (). Mirtronic miR-4646-5p can facilitate GC metastasis by regulating ABHD16A and the metabolite lysophosphatidylserine (). As a tumor suppressor, miR-1343-3p can inhibit the expression and activation of the GC oncogene TEAD4 to some extent (), and can also promote autophagy in thyroid cancer cells through ATG7 (). Related studies showed that miR-1343-3p can be suppressed by LINC01559 adsorption, leading to PGK1 up-regulation and activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, thereby promoting GC proliferation and migration ().
Our previous research confirmed that salidroside significantly upregulates the tumor suppressor miR-1343-3p in GC cells, which is nearly non-expressed in the control group but markedly induced after salidroside treatment (). Through integrated bioinformatics analysis, including miRNA-mRNA target prediction and functional enrichment studies (GO/KEGG) (), we identified ACOT11 as a key regulator of FFA metabolism that is both significantly downregulated and directly modulated by miR-1343-3p. ACOT11 expression is negatively correlated with miR-1343-3p. Acyl-CoA thioesterases (ACOTs) are an essential enzyme family in mammalian fatty acid metabolism, hydrolyzing fatty acyl-CoA in mitochondria to form FFA and acetyl-CoA. FFAs undergo β-oxidation to produce ATP, regulating critical cellular metabolic processes such as lipid biosynthesis and signal transduction (). Current research on ACOT11 in tumor metabolism remains limited, with only a few other ACOT family members reported to participate in cancer metabolic reprogramming. For instance: ACOT8 overexpression correlates with lung adenocarcinoma metastasis and may mediate intracellular lipid metabolism (). In hepatocellular carcinoma, ACOT12 regulates cellular acetyl-CoA levels and histone acetylation to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis (). ACOT13 and ACOT15 have also been implicated in modulating hepatic lipid metabolism (, ). ACOT11 is highly expressed in lung adenocarcinoma cells, promoting proliferation, migration, and invasion (), suggesting its role in cancer progression. However, the mechanism of ACOT11 in GC remains unclear.
This study, employing Pearson correlation and genetic locus analysis, revealed a significant association between ACOT11 and miR-1343-3p in GC cells. Further RIP assays confirmed the interaction between miR-1343-3p and ACOT11, indicating that salidroside likely inhibits GC cell proliferation by down-regulating ACOT11 through miR-1343-3p targeting, thereby interfering with lipid metabolism and energy production. Subsequent mechanistic investigations demonstrated that salidroside treatment significantly upregulated miR-1343-3p expression while concurrently downregulating ACOT11 at both transcriptional and translational levels. In vivo studies confirmed that salidroside and miR-1343-3p agomir reduced tumor size, volume, and weight, upregulated miR-1343-3p expression, downregulated ACOT11 at the gene and protein levels, increased fatty acyl-CoA concentration, and decreased acetyl-CoA, FFA, and ATP concentrations. These results indicate that salidroside affects GC proliferation by regulating the miR-1343-3p/ACOT11/FFA lipid metabolism signaling pathway. Yang et al. developed a novel nano-platform encapsulating LINC00958 siRNA for the systemic treatment of liver cancer. Histopathological examination of mouse liver HE staining and blood biochemical tests confirmed that si-LINC00958 had no obvious toxic or side effects, which holds significant implications for further clinical trials (). This suggests that regulatory factors such as miR-1343-3p and ACOT11, which are associated with GC, may also become key targets for diagnosis and treatment.
Although this study confirms that salidroside exhibits strong anti-cancer effects in both cancer cells and animal tumor models, it lacks sufficient clinical trial evidence to demonstrate its clinical efficacy, safety, stability, and the persistence of therapeutic outcomes; additionally, extensive experiments are needed to validate the degree of drug resistance induced during treatment. Furthermore, the complexity of salidroside’s mechanism via the miRNA-mRNA signaling axis may introduce hidden factors influencing therapeutic efficacy. Meanwhile, the current research has only established this mechanism in a single GC cell line, demonstrating salidroside’s crucial role in regulating lipid metabolism and suppressing tumor growth through up-regulation of the important tumor-suppressing factor miR-1343-3p. This limitation necessitates further investigation. Our research group will subsequently validate these findings across multiple GC cell lines to confirm the universality of these results and advance this line of research.
Existing studies indicate that salidroside may upregulate miR-195, modulating the Protein kinase B (AKT) and MEK/ERK signaling pathways, or enhance miR-103-3p to target the Marginal zone B-and B1-cell-specific protein (Mzb1), thereby suppressing lung cancer proliferation and metastasis (, ). Additionally, research has reported that salidroside may inhibit nasopharyngeal carcinoma proliferation by up-regulating miR-4262, which targets Glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) () The current study has systematically elucidated for the first time the mechanism by which salidroside inhibits gastric cancer through lipid metabolism pathways, providing a theoretical basis for salidroside to inhibit gastric cancer through miRNA. Looking forward, we propose to expand this research by examining salidroside’s regulation of non-coding RNAs and establishing a molecular network of salidroside anti-tumor activity and miRNA regulation in gastric cancer. Future studies should explore salidroside’s multi-target, multi-effect mechanisms against GC through various pathways including glucose metabolism, autophagy, methylation and cell death processes. A deeper investigation into the interaction network between miR-1343-3p and its target mRNA genes under salidroside regulation will provide novel theoretical insights into GC pathogenesis. In a word, this work provides a new research direction for the diagnosis and treatment of GC, making it possible to develop novel molecular markers for the treatment of GC.
5 Conclusions
This study establishes a novel anti-tumor mechanism of salidroside in GC through the miR-1343-3p/ACOT11/FFA metabolic axis. We demonstrate that salidroside potently induces miR-1343-3p expression, which directly targets and suppresses ACOT11, resulting in significant downregulation at both mRNA and protein levels. This molecular regulation leads to profound metabolic disruption characterized by fatty acyl-CoA accumulation, impaired hydrolysis, and subsequent depletion of downstream metabolites and ATP production. This study holds significant importance for understanding lipid metabolism reprogramming in GC cells and cancer progression, offering substantial potential for the development of targeted therapies.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
Ethical approval was not required for the studies on humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because only commercially available established cell lines were used. The animal study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xizang Minzu University, Xizang Minzu University. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
ZZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. MC: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. YD: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. PW: Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. XH: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. XW: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82460515), the Natural Science Basic Research Plan of Shaanxi Province (grant number 2025JC-YBMS-1088), the Central Guidance on Local Science and Technology Development Fund of Xizang Autonomous Region (grant number LSKJ202447), the Key R&D Projects of Xianyang Municipal Science and Technology Programme (grant number L2024-ZDYF-SF-0025) and the Graduate research innovation and practice projects of Xizang Minzu University (grant number Y2025140).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
MAP3K6, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 6; MMP24, matrix metallopeptidase 24; TEAD4, TEA domain transcription factor 4; ACOT11, acyl-CoA thioesterase 11; CeRNA, competing endogenous RNA; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FA-CoA, fatty acyl-CoA; A-CoA, acetyl-CoA; FFA, free fatty acid; AKT, Protein kinase B; Mzb1, Marginal zone B-and B1-cell-specific protein; GRP78, Glucose-regulated protein 78
References
1
HanBZhengRZengHWangSSunKChenRet al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022. J Natl Cancer Cent. (2024) 4:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006
2
TangCZhaoCCYiHGengZJWuXYZhangYet al. Traditional tibetan medicine in cancer therapy by targeting apoptosis pathways. Front Pharmacol. (2020) 11:976. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00976
3
CalabreseEJDhawanGKapoorRAgathokleousECalabreseV. Rhodiola rosea and salidroside commonly induce hormesis, with particular focus on longevity and neuroprotection. Chem Biol Interact. (2023) 380:110540. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110540
4
LiuJCaiJFanPDongXZhangNTaiJet al. Salidroside protects mice from high-fat diet-induced obesity by modulating the gut microbiota. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 120:110278. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110278
5
SęczykŁSugierDDervişoğluGÖzdemirFAKołodziejB. Phytochemical profile, in vitro bioaccessibility, and anticancer potential of golden root (Rhodiola rosea L.) extracts. Food Chem. (2023) 404:134779. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134779
6
RongLLiZLengXLiHMaYChenYet al. Salidroside induces apoptosis and protective autophagy in human gastric cancer AGS cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. BioMed Pharmacother. (2020) 122:109726. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109726
7
DaiZZhangXLiWTangJPanTMaCet al. Salidroside induces apoptosis in human gastric cancer cells via the downregulation of ENO1/PKM2/GLUT1 expression. Biol Pharm Bull. (2021) 44:1724–31. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b21-00443
8
FuYHuangGCaiYRenMChengRChaiYet al. Integrated network pharmacology, bioinformatics, and experiment analysis to decipher the molecular mechanism of Salidroside on Gastric cancer via targeting NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy. Chem Biol Interact. (2025) 407:111368. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2024.111368
9
LinWZhouQWangCQZhuLBiCZhangSet al. LncRNAs regulate metabolism in cancer. Int J Biol Sci. (2020) 16:1194–206. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.40769
10
ButlerLMPeroneYDehairsJLupienLEde LaatVTalebiAet al. Lipids and cancer: Emerging roles in pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. (2020) 159:245–93. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.013
11
YangSSunBLiWYangHLiNZhangX. Fatty acid metabolism is related to the immune microenvironment changes of gastric cancer and RGS2 is a new tumor biomarker. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1065927. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1065927
12
SunQYuXPengCLiuNChenWXuHet al. Activation of SREBP-1c alters lipogenesis and promotes tumor growth and metastasis in gastric cancer. BioMed Pharmacother. (2020) 128:110274. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110274
13
BroadfieldLAPaneAATalebiASwinnenJVFendtSM. Lipid metabolism in cancer: New perspectives and emerging mechanisms. Dev Cell. (2021) 56:1363–93. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.013
14
WuHLiuBChenZLiGZhangZ. MSC-induced lncRNA HCP5 drove fatty acid oxidation through miR-3619-5p/AMPK/PGC1α/CEBPB axis to promote stemness and chemo-resistance of gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. (2020) 11:233. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2426-z
15
YangLHouYDuYELiQZhouFLiYet al. Mirtronic miR-4646-5p promotes gastric cancer metastasis by regulating ABHD16A and metabolite lysophosphatidylserines. Cell Death Differ. (2021) 28:2708–27. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00779-y
16
YangQKongSYuJXuYTaoMMaSet al. MicroRNA miR-1275 coordinately regulates AEA/LPA signals via targeting FAAH in lipid metabolism reprogramming of gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. (2023) 14:62. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05584-8
17
VladimirovSTomasevicMPopovNMunjasJde Gonzalo-CalvoDSopicM. The converging roles of microRNAs and lipid metabolism in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. (2025) 114:41–59. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2025.06.005
18
WangXZhangZCaoX. Salidroside inhibited the proliferation of gastric cancer cells through up-regulating tumor suppressor miR-1343-3p and down-regulating MAP3K6/MMP24 signal molecules. Cancer Biol Ther. (2024) 25:2322206. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2024.2322206
19
ZhouYHuangTZhangJWongCCZhangBDongYet al. TEAD1/4 exerts oncogenic role and is negatively regulated by miR-4269 in gastric tumorigenesis. Oncogene. (2017) 36:6518–30. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.257
20
SmythECNilssonMGrabschHIvan GriekenNCLordickF. Gastric cancer. Lancet. (2020) 396:635–48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5
21
ShalapourSKarinM. Cruel to be kind: Epithelial, microbial, and immune cell interactions in gastrointestinal cancers. Annu Rev Immunol. (2020) 38:649–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-082019-081656
22
HeJChenWQLiZSLiNRenJSTianJHet al. China guideline for the screening, early detection and early treatment of gastric cancer (2022, Beijing). Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. (2022) 44:634–66. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220617-00430
23
AjaniJAD’AmicoTABentremDJChaoJCookeDCorveraCet al. Gastric cancer, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. (2022) 20:167–92. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0008
24
SextonREAlHMDiabMAzmiAS. Gastric cancer: A comprehensive review of current and future treatment strategies. Cancer Metastasis Rev. (2020) 39:1179–203. doi: 10.1007/s10555-020-09925-3
25
DuYHuLWuGTangYCaiXYinL. Diagnoses in multiple types of cancer based on serum Raman spectroscopy combined with a convolutional neural network: Gastric cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, lung cancer. Spectrochim Acta Mol Biomol Spectrosc. (2023) 298:122743. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122743
26
GuanWLHeYXuRH. Gastric cancer treatment: Recent progress and future perspectives. J Hematol Oncol. (2023) 16:57. doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01451-3
27
ShaoNQiuHLiuJXiaoDZhaoJChenCet al. Targeting lipid metabolism of macrophages: A new strategy for tumor therapy. J Adv Res. (2025) 68:99–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2024.02.009
28
ChengCGengFChengXGuoD. Lipid metabolism reprogramming and its potential targets in cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond). (2018) 38:27. doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0301-4
29
CuiMYYiXZhuDXWuJ. Aberrant lipid metabolism reprogramming and immune microenvironment for gastric cancer: A literature review. Transl Cancer Res. (2021) 10:3829–42. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-655
30
LiXLuoJMouKPengLZhouHLeiYet al. SDPR inhibits TGF-β induced cancer metastasis through fatty acid oxidation regulation in gastric cancer. Int J Biol Sci. (2023) 19:2999–3014. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.83012
31
YangZChenYMiaoYYanHChenKXuYet al. Elucidating stearoyl metabolism and NCOA4-mediated ferroptosis in gastric cancer liver metastasis through multi-omics single-cell integrative mendelian analysis: Advancing personalized immunotherapy strategies. Discov Oncol. (2025) 16:46. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-01769-z
32
SnaebjornssonMTJanaki-RamanSSchulzeA. Greasing the wheels of the cancer machine: The role of lipid metabolism in cancer. Cell Metab. (2020) 31:62–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.11.010
33
WangXLiuHZhangQZhangXQinYZhuGet al. LINC00514 promotes lipogenesis and tumor progression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by sponging miR-378a-5p to enhance SPHK1 expression. Int J Oncol. (2021) 59:86. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5266
34
GuoSZhangYWangSYangTMaBLiXet al. LncRNA PCA3 promotes antimony-induced lipid metabolic disorder in prostate cancer by targeting MIR-132-3P/SREBP1 signaling. Toxicol Lett. (2021) 348:50–8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.05.006
35
WuHLiuBChenZLiGZhangZ. MSC-induced lncRNA HCP5 drove fatty acid oxidation through miR-3619-5p/AMPK/PGC1α/CEBPB axis to promote stemness and chemo-resistance of gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. (2020) 11:233. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2426-z
36
YangLHouYDuYELiQZhouFLiYet al. Mirtronic miR-4646-5p promotes gastric cancer metastasis by regulating ABHD16A and metabolite lysophosphatidylserines. Cell Death Differ. (2021) 28:2708–27. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00779-y
37
QinYSunWWangZDongWHeLZhangTet al. ATF2-Induced lncRNA GAS8-AS1 promotes autophagy of thyroid cancer cells by targeting the miR-187-3p/ATG5 and miR-1343-3p/ATG7 axes. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. (2020) 22:584–600. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.09.022
38
WangLBoXYiXXiaoXZhengQMaLet al. Exosome-transferred LINC01559 promotes the progression of gastric cancer via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. (2020) 11:723. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02810-5
39
TillanderVAlexsonSCohenDE. Deactivating fatty acids: Acyl-CoA Thioesterase-Mediated control of lipid metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2017) 28:473–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2017.03.001
40
JungWYKimYHRyuYJKimBHShinBKKimAet al. Acyl-CoA thioesterase 8 is a specific protein related to nodal metastasis and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. (2013) 209:276–83. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2013.02.008
41
LuMZhuWWWangXTangJJZhangKLYuGYet al. ACOT12-Dependent alteration of Acetyl-CoA drives hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by epigenetic induction of Epithelial-Mesenchymal transition. Cell Metab. (2019) 29:886–900. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.12.019
42
KangHWNiepelMWHanSKawanoYCohenDE. Thioesterase superfamily member 2/acyl-CoA thioesterase 13 (Them2/Acot13) regulates hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism. FASEB J. (2012) 26:2209–21. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-202853
43
ZhuravlevaEGutHHynxDMarcellinDBleckCKGenoudCet al. Acyl coenzyme a thioesterase Them5/Acot15 is involved in cardiolipin remodeling and fatty liver development. Mol Cell Biol. (2012) 32:2685–97. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00312-12
44
LiangCWangXZhangZXiaoFFengHMaQet al. ACOT11 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion in lung adenocarcinoma. Transl Lung Cancer Res. (2020) 9:1885–903. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-19-509
45
ZuoXChenZGaoWZhangYWangJWangJet al. M6A-mediated upregulation of LINC00958 increases lipogenesis and acts as a nanotherapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. (2020) 13:5. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0839-x
46
RenMXuWXuT. Salidroside represses proliferation, migration and invasion of human lung cancer cells through AKT and MEK/ERK signal pathway. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. (2019) 47:1014–21. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1584566
47
ZhuXLiuDWangYDongM. Salidroside suppresses nonsmall cell lung cancer cells proliferation and migration via microRNA-103-3p/Mzb1. Anticancer Drugs. (2020) 31:663–71. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000926
48
LiuSLiYLiZ. Salidroside suppresses the activation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells via targeting miR-4262/GRP78 axis. Cell Cycle. (2022) 21:720–29. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2021.2019976
Summary
Keywords
gastric cancer, salidroside, lipid metabolism, miR-1343-3p, ACOT11
Citation
Zhang Z, Cao M, Du Y, Wang P, Hou X and Wang X (2025) Salidroside suppresses gastric cancer progression via miR-1343-3p-mediated repression of ACOT11 and disruption of fatty acid metabolism. Front. Oncol. 15:1651857. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1651857
Received
22 June 2025
Accepted
15 August 2025
Published
04 September 2025
Volume
15 - 2025
Edited by
Parames C. Sil, Bose Institute, India
Reviewed by
Leandro José de Assis, University of Plymouth, United Kingdom
Sourav Kumar Nandi, Jadavpur University, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Zhang, Cao, Du, Wang, Hou and Wang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaoping Wang, xpwang@xzmu.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
‡ORCID: Xiaoping Wang, orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-4549
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.