Abstract
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy (CT-PLB) in the diagnosis of atypical pulmonary hamartoma (APH) and pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma (PSP).
Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed 19 patients with pulmonary nodules who underwent CT-PLB at our hospital between October 2016 and August 2019. All patients underwent surgical excision within two weeks following CT-PLB, and the postoperative histopathological results were used as the reference standard for diagnosis. Among these patients, ten cases were confirmed as PSP and assigned to the PSP group, while nine cases were diagnosed as pulmonary hamartoma and assigned to the APH group. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-PLB for APH and PSP, as well as the incidence of procedure-related complications, were analyzed and compared.
Results:
Among the 19 patients, the overall diagnostic accuracy of CT-PLB was 89.5% (17/19). The diagnostic accuracy was 88.9% (8/9) in the APH group and 90.0% (9/10) in the PSP group. Complications included one case of minimal pneumothorax in the PSP group and one case of mild hemoptysis in the APH group. Additionally, 14 patients experienced mild to moderate pulmonary hemorrhage, including 8 cases (5 mild, 3 moderate) in the APH group and 6 cases (all mild) in the PSP group. No severe complications, such as pleural reactions, occurred in any patient.
Conclusion:
CT-PLB demonstrates high clinical diagnostic value for both APH and PSP. The procedure is safe, reliable, and associated with few complications. Thus, it can serve as a valuable tool for preoperative clinical diagnosis.
1 Introduction
Pulmonary hamartoma (PH) is a benign tumor originating from mesenchymal tissue and represents the most common benign lung tumor, accounting for approximately 70% of all benign pulmonary neoplasms (). PH is characterized by a heterogeneous assemblage of tissues, typically encompassing cartilage, fat tissue, fibrous tissue, and smooth muscle, resulting in diverse computed tomography (CT) manifestations (). Characteristic CT features of PH include the presence of intranodular fat and “popcorn-like” calcifications (). The variable proportions of fat and/or cartilage within PH can lead to diverse attenuation patterns on CT, resulting in atypical CT characteristics (). Consequently, such lesions can be classified as atypical pulmonary hamartomas (APH) (), posing challenges for clinical diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma (PSP), previously referred to as pulmonary sclerosing hemangioma, is a rare benign lung tumor that predominantly affects Asian women (). It accounts for approximately 10.7% of benign pulmonary neoplasms, ranking second only to PH (, ). On CT images, PSP typically presents as a well-defined solitary nodule with relatively homogeneous density. The lesion may exhibit punctate calcifications and marked contrast enhancement, often characterized by a prolonged enhancement. Common CT features include peripheral vascular tail signs and halo signs (, ). However, these characteristics are not pathognomonic and may be absent or less conspicuous in certain cases (, ).
PH is generally a benign neoplasm characterized by slow growth. Consequently, a conservative management strategy involving regular imaging follow-up is typically employed, with surgical resection reserved for cases presenting clinical symptoms or significant of the lesion (, ). In contrast, although pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma (PSP) is also classified as a benign tumor, it possesses low-grade malignant potential and may cause local compressive symptoms. Therefore, active surgical intervention aimed at complete resection is often preferred to reduce the risk of recurrence (, ). Given these distinct clinical characteristics, accurate differentiation between PH and PSP is crucial for guiding appropriate treatment strategies. CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy (CT-PLB) is a minimally invasive, precisely localized diagnostic procedure that enables acquisition of representative tumor tissue under imaging guidance, thereby providing reliable pathological confirmation (, ). However, due to the rarity of both neoplasms, there have been no studies evaluating the utility of CT-PLB in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of APH and PSP.
This study aims to evaluate the utility of CT-PLB in the diagnosis of APH and PSP, thereby providing clinicians with a safe and reliable diagnostic tool to personalized treatment strategies guided by accurate pathological diagnoses.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study population
This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital, and the requirement for written informed consent was waived. Patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and CT-PLB for pulmonary nodules at our hospital between October 2016 and August 2019 were retrospectively identified. All enrolled patients subsequently underwent surgical resection, with postoperative pathological examination confirming a diagnosis of PH or PSP.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) pathological diagnosis of PH or PSP confirmed by postoperative histopathological examination; (2) presence of atypical imaging features on preoperative CECT images, leading to diagnostic uncertainty; and (3) successful acquisition of adequate pathological specimens from pulmonary nodules via CT-PLB prior to surgery. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) absence of available CECT images in the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) or incomplete imaging data precluding comprehensive analysis; and (2) incomplete clinical or pathological records, rendering patient data insufficient for analysis. Among 3, 158 patients who underwent CT-PLB, 19 patients were enrolled following a rigorous screening process. Each enrolled patient had a solitary lesion, resulting in the final evaluation of 19 lesions.
2.2 Preoperative preparation for CT-PLB
All patients underwent CECT prior to biopsy to accurately assess tumor size, number, and location, thereby confirming the target tumor. A personalized CT-PLB plan was subsequently developed based on each patient’s individual condition, including optimal positioning, selection of needle entry site, and identification of potential complications, with corresponding preparations made accordingly. A comprehensive pre-biopsy evaluation was conducted, including assessments of liver and renal function, electrocardiogram (ECG), complete blood count (CBC), and coagulation profile, to determine patients’ overall health status and eligibility for the procedure. Detailed explanations of the biopsy process, associated precautions, potential complications, and management strategies were provided to ensure that patients and their families fully understood the procedure. Informed consent was subsequently obtained.
Additionally, patients were instructed in breathing exercises designed to minimize movement during the biopsy. Specifically, they practiced breath-holding for 10 to 15 seconds while relaxed, followed by slow and even breathing, thereby reducing the risk of coughing or sudden movements during the procedure.
2.3 CT-PLB procedure
All biopsies were performed by a team of three interventional radiologists, each with over four years of experience in CT-PLB. The procedures were carried out using a 16-slice spiral CT scanner (SOMATOM Emotion 16, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Pre-biopsy thin-slice CECT images were utilized to determine the optimal patient positioning—supine, prone, or lateral—based on the nodule’s location and the patient’s overall condition. Patients were then positioned accordingly on the CT examination table, and axial chest CT scans were acquired with a slice thickness of 3 mm and a reconstruction thickness of 1.5 mm.Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions were performed to evaluate the lesion’s location, size, spatial relationship with adjacent vessels, and distance from the chest wall. Additionally, the depth from the edge of the nodule to the skin surface was measured.
The procedure was meticulously designed to circumvent bony structures, blood vessels, pulmonary bullae, and fissures, prioritizing the shortest and safest trajectory based on the nodule’s largest cross-sectional area. Consequently, the puncture trajectory, angle, and depth were systematically determined. The puncture site was accurately identified using laser positioning lines and surface locating grids, and subsequently marked with a skin marker. Following comprehensive disinfection and the application of a sterile surgical drape, local anesthesia was administered using lidocaine. The needle used for the administration of local anesthetic lidocaine was retained at the subcutaneous puncture site to serve as a marker, facilitating precise alignment of the puncture trajectory and angle. This practice effectively minimizes the CT scanning range, thereby reducing the patient’s exposure to radiation.
Subsequently, the coaxial biopsy needle was advanced into the lesion, and one to four tissue samples were obtained using the BioPince™ 18-gauge full core biopsy instrument (BioPince™, Argon Medical Devices, Inc., USA). The specimens were immediately fixed in 10% formalin for pathological examination. If the sample was insufficient, the puncture path could be adjusted for repeat sampling.
Throughout the procedure, the patient’s vital signs were closely monitored. Patients were instructed to hold their breath during needle withdrawal to reduce the risk of complications. Following the biopsy, a chest CT scan was performed to assess potential complications, including pneumothorax and hemorrhage. The puncture site was compressed for 1 to 2 minutes and then bandaged. Patients were observed for 4 hours post-biopsy, during which vital signs and oxygen saturation were continuously monitored. They were advised to avoid strenuous activities and coughing after the biopsy. Minor pneumothorax typically does not require intervention; however, patients should limit physical activity for 24 hours to prevent exacerbation of the pneumothorax.
2.4 Data collection and statistical analysis
The anatomical characteristics of the lesions were systematically documented utilizing preoperative CECT images. These characteristics encompassed the lesion’s location, the long and short diameters, the mean CT value on pre-contrast and arterial-phase images, the tumor morphology (e.g., lobulated or spiculated margins), and associated imaging signs such as vascular encasement. Additionally, parameters pertinent to the biopsy procedure were meticulously recorded, including the number of needle insertions, the quantity of biopsy samples obtained, the puncture position, and the types of complications encountered, such as pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage, hemoptysis, and pleural reactions. The postoperative pathological results were considered the gold standard. The diagnostic accuracy of the biopsy pathology was ascertained by comparing the biopsy findings with the corresponding surgical pathology results, as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Continuous variables that followed a normal distribution were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and comparisons between groups were performed using independent samples t-test. Variables that did not adhere to a normal distribution were presented as median [interquartile range (IQR)] and assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were evaluated using either the chi-square test or Fishe’s exact test, depending on suitability. Comparative analyses of imaging features, biopsy accuracy, and complication rates between the APH group and the PSP group were performed. Statistical significance was established at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were executed using R software (version 4.3.1).
3 Results
3.1 Clinical and CT characteristics
A total of 19 patients were enrolled in this study, with a mean age of 53.16 ± 8.52 years (range, 37–67 years), comprising 2 males and 17 females (Table 1). The APH group comprised 9 patients (2 males and 7 females) with a mean age of 52.22 ± 11.09 years, exhibiting an age range comparable to that of the entire study population. The PSP group consisted of 10 female patients, with a mean age of 54.00 ± 4.73 years (range, 48–64 years).
Table 1
| Clinical and CT characteristics | Groups | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(n = 19) | APH (n = 9) | PSP (n = 10) | ||
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 53.16 ± 8.42 | 52.22 ± 11.09 | 54.00 ± 4.73 | 0.683@ |
| Gender, n (%) | 0.211# | |||
| Male | 2(10.5) | 2(22.2) | 0(0) | |
| Female | 17(89.5) | 7(77.8) | 10(100.0) | |
| Zone location, n (%) | 0.034# | |||
| Middle zone | 5 (26.3) | 1 (11.1) | 4 (40.0) | |
| Inner zone | 3 (15.8) | 0 (0) | 3 (30.0) | |
| Outer zone | 11 (57.9) | 8 (88.9) | 3 (30.0) | |
| Lobe location, n (%) | 0.163# | |||
| Right upper lobe | 3 (15.8) | 2 (22.2) | 1 (10.0) | |
| Right middle lobe | 3 (15.8) | 1 (11.1) | 2 (20.0) | |
| Right lower lobe | 7 (36.8) | 4 (44.4) | 3 (30.0) | |
| Left upper lobe | 2 (10.5) | 2 (22.2) | 0 (0) | |
| Left lower lobe | 4 (21.1) | 0 (0) | 4 (40.0) | |
| Pre-contrast mean CT value (Hu), mean (SD) | 27.70 ± 9.94 | 22.03 ± 7.37 | 32.80 ± 9.17 | 0.017@ |
| Arterial phase mean CT value (Hu), median [IQR] | 45.47[32.19, 61.24] | 32.190[26.21, 37.25] | 58.47[46.73, 83.53] | <0.001& |
| Long diameter (cm), median [IQR] | 21.28[12.58, 28.32] | 12.58[10.58, 22.75] | 22.12[20.73, 39.45] | 0.030& |
| Short diameter (cm), median [IQR] | 18.94[9.79, 32.86] | 9.79[9.41, 17.16] | 21.13[18.94, 35.81] | 0.016& |
| Morphology, n (%) | 0.353# | |||
| Oval | 3 (15.8) | 1 (11.1) | 2 (20.0) | |
| Rounded | 12 (63.2) | 6 (66.7) | 6 (60.0) | |
| Irregular | 2 (10.5) | 0 (0) | 2 (20.0) | |
| Lobulated | 2 (10.5) | 2 (22.2) | 0 (0) | |
| Air crescent sign, n (%) | 1.000# | |||
| Absent | 18 (94.7) | 9 (100.0) | 9 (90.0) | |
| Present | 1 (5.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (10.0) | |
| Vascular interface sign, n (%) | 0.040# | |||
| Absent | 8 (42.1) | 6 (66.7) | 2 (20.0) | |
| Present | 11 (57.9) | 3 (33.3) | 8 (80.0) | |
Analysis of clinical and CT characteristics.
@independent samples t-test; &Mannwhitney-U test; #chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.
In the APH group, the lesion distribution by lung lobe was as follows: right upper lobe (2 cases), right middle lobe (1 case), right lower lobe (4 cases), left upper lobe (2 cases), and left lower lobe (0 case). In terms of zone distribution, there were 0 cases in the inner zone, 1 case in the middle zone, and 8 cases in the outer zone. In the PSP group, lesions were located in the right upper lobe (1 case), right middle lobe (2 cases), right lower lobe (3 cases), left upper lobe (0 case), and left lower lobe (4 cases). Additionally, there were 3 cases in the inner zone, 3 cases in the middle zone, and 4 cases in the outer zone.
The quantitative CT analysis demonstrated that the mean CT value of the lesions on pre-contrast images was significantly lower in the APH group (22.03 ± 7.37 Hounsfield units [HU]) compared to the PSP group (32.80 ± 9.17 HU; P = 0.017). Similarly, the mean CT value of the lesions on arterial-phase differed significantly between the two groups (P < 0.001). The median long diameter of lesions was 12.58 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 10.58–22.75 cm) in the APH group, significantly smaller than that in the PSP group, which measured 22.12 cm (IQR, 20.73–39.45 cm; P = 0.030). The median short diameter was also smaller in the APH group at 9.79 cm (IQR, 9.41–17.16 cm) versus 21.13 cm (IQR, 18.94–35.81 cm) in the PSP group (P = 0.016).
“Vascular encasement” was observed in 3 of 9 cases (33.3%) in the APH group and 8 of 10 cases (80%) in the PSP group, representing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.040). Regarding lesion morphology, the APH group comprised 0 irregular, 1 oval, 6 round, and 2 slightly lobulated nodules, whereas the PSP group included 2 irregular, 2 oval, 6 round, and no slightly lobulated nodules. No statistically significant difference was foundin lesion morphology distribution between the two groups (P = 0.353).
Regarding comorbidities, the PSP group included one case each of breast cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and pulmonary adenocarcinoma, whereas the APH group had one case of breast cancer and two cases of pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
3.2 CT-PLB analysis and complications
As summarized in Table 2, in the APH group, 5 patients underwent the procedure in the supine position, 3 in the prone position, and 1 in the left lateral decubitus position. In the PSP group, 4 patients underwent the procedure in the supine position and 6 in the prone position. There was no statistically significant difference in patient puncture positioning and needle adjustment between the two groups. The median number of biopsy tissue samples obtained was 2.00 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.00–2.00) in the APH group and 2.00 (IQR, 2.00–3.00) in the PSP group, with no significant difference (P = 0.210).
Table 2
| CT-PLB and complications data | Groups | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(n = 19) | APH (n = 9) | PSP (n = 10) | ||
| Position, n (%) | 0.484# | |||
| Supine | 9 (47.4) | 5 (55.6) | 4 (40.0) | |
| Prone | 9 (47.4) | 3 (33.3) | 6 (60.0) | |
| Left Lateral | 1 (5.2) | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0) | |
| Needle adjustment (n), mean (SD) | 3.26 (1.52) | 3.111 (1.29) | 3.40 (1.69) | 0.698@ |
| Tissue sample (n), median [IQR] | 2.00 (2.00, 3.00) | 2.00 (2.00, 2.00) | 2.000 (2.00, 3.00) | 0.210& |
| Pulmonary Hemorrhage, n (%) | 0.112# | |||
| None | 5 (26.3) | 1 (11.1) | 4 (40.0) | |
| Minimal | 11 (57.9) | 5 (55.6) | 6 (60.0) | |
| Moderate | 3 (15.8) | 3 (33.3) | 0 (0) | |
| Hemoptysis, n (%) | 0.474# | |||
| None | 18 (94.7) | 8 (88.9) | 10 (100.0) | |
| Present | 1 (5.3) | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0) | |
| Pneumothorax, n (%) | 1.000# | |||
| None | 18 (94.7) | 9 (100.0) | 9 (90.0) | |
| Present | 1 (5.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (10.0) | |
Analysis of CT-guided puncture and complications data.
#chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test; @independent samples t-test; &Mann-Whitney U test.
Regarding complications, pulmonary hemorrhage occurred in both groups. In the APH group, there were 5 cases of minor bleeding and 3 cases of moderate bleeding, whereas in the PSP group, 6 cases were classified as minor bleeding. The difference in hemorrhage severity between the two groups was not statistically significant. Notably, no cases of pneumothorax were observed in the PSP group, while the APH group had 1 case of minor pneumothorax. Hemoptysis was reported in only 1 case in the APH group and was absent in the PSP group. Additionally, no pleural reactions were observed in either group.
3.3 CT-PLB pathology results and surgical pathology results
Among the 19 patients with pulmonary nodules, the puncture success rate was 100%. Using pathological findings from surgical resection as the gold standard, the overall diagnostic accuracy of CT-PLB was 89.5% (17/19). Specifically, the diagnostic accuracy was 88.9% (8/9) in the APH group and 90.0% (9/10) in the PSP group, with no statistically significant difference observed between the two groups.
In the APH group, one false-negative case was recorded, where the biopsy specimen contained only a limited amount of lung tissue. Similarly, the PSP group had one false-negative case, in which the biopsy revealed atypical cells insufficient to establish a definitive diagnosis.
4 Discussion
PH and pulmonary PSP are the two most common benign lung tumors (, ). From a pathological perspective, the two tumors exhibit markedly different histological features. PH is characterized by a heterogeneous mixture of tissue components, including cartilage, adipose tissue, and fibrous tissue, that collectively form a distinctive “puzzle-like” architecture. In contrast, PSP displays highly variable histological morphology, predominantly comprising four distinct pathological patterns: papillary, solid, sclerotic, and hemorrhagic (). Epidemiologically, PH is more commonly observed in middle-aged and elderly men (), whereas PSP predominantly affects middle-aged women (). On CT images, both PH and PSP typically manifest as well-defined solitary pulmonary nodules or masses without obvious lobulation or spiculation, and occasionally contain calcific foci (). Notably, the presence of “popcorn” calcification on CT scans is considered a characteristic feature of PH (, ). Accurate identification of PH on imaging is crucial because it informs appropriate follow-up intervals and facilitates regular monitoring. However, these characteristic imaging features are observed in fewer than 30% of cases (, ), and and atypical presentations of pulmonary hamartomas can complicate diagnosis. Therefore, relying solely on morphological imaging characteristics is often insufficient to reliably differentiate PH from PSP.
There are significant differences in treatment strategies between PH and PSP. PH is typically a benign lesion characterized by slow growth, and its management primarily involves observation and regular follow-up; surgical resection is considered only when severe symptoms develop or if the lesion exhibits rapid growth (). In contrast, although PSP is also benign, it has the potential for low-grade malignant behavior that may lead to local compressive symptoms. Therefore, early surgical intervention is often recommended to achieve complete resection and minimize the risk of recurrence (–). Accurate differentiation between the two lesions is crucial for formulating appropriate treatment plans, and robust diagnostic capabilities can effectively guide clinical decision-making. Our study revealed that in instances where imaging diagnostics fail to effectively distinguish between APH and PSP, the CT-PLB can serve as an potential approach for achieving a accurate diagnosis. This accurate diagnostic approach facilitates the development of targeted treatment strategies, thereby potentially delivering substantial clinical benefits to patients. Specifically, when CT-PLB confirms a diagnosis of APH and the lesion is small and asymptomatic, it is advisable to adopt a watchful waiting approach in order to avoid unnecessary surgical trauma. Conversely, for patients diagnosed with PSP, even in the absence of clinical symptoms, selective surgical intervention is recommended to mitigate the risk of future metastasis, considering the tumor’s malignant potential.
In recent years, with continuous advancements in medical technology, CT-PLB has been widely adopted for the qualitative diagnosis of pulmonary diseases, particularly in tumor diagnosis and differential diagnosis (–). CT-PLB is characterized by minimal lung tissue trauma, precise lesion localization, high safety, and a low incidence of complications (, ). CT imaging not only provides clear visualization of lesion location, size, and spatial relationship with surrounding tissues but also facilitates evaluation of necrotic areas within the lesion, thereby providing significant diagnostic advantages (, , ). The diagnostic accuracy of CT-PLB for pulmonary lesions is reported to range from 93% to 95% (). Several studies have demonstrated that value of CT-PLB in the qualitative diagnosis of PH and PSP; however, comparative analyses regarding their diagnostic accuracy, complication rates, and distinguishing features remain limited (, ).
Our research findings demonstrate that among 19 cases of CT-PLB, the puncture success rate was 100%. Of these, 17 cases yielded biopsy results consistent with postoperative pathological results, resulting in an accuracy rate of 89.5% (17/19). In the APH group, one case resulted a false-negative outcome, where the biopsy specimen contained only a small amount of lung tissue. Retrospective analysis revealed that the tumor measured 1.04 cm and 0.93 cm in its long and short diameters, respectively, suggesting that the small tumor size may have contributed to inadequate lesion sampling. In a previous study, Tipaldi et al. () revealed that nodule size is a key imaging predictor of the diagnostic success rate of CT-PLB, with nodules smaller than 18 mm in diameter potentially yielding inconclusive histopathological results. Furthermore, the increased number of punctures necessitated by the small tumor size led to moderate pulmonary hemorrhage in this patient. In the PSP group, there was also one false-negative case, in which the biopsy revealed only a small number of atypical cells. Retrospective analysis revealed that the tumor measured 2.62 cm and 2.37 cm in its long and short diameters, respectively. The false-negative result may be attributed to the pronounced heterogeneity of the tumor, which caused the puncture site to miss characteristic PSP structures, thereby impeding accurate qualitative diagnosis.
Pneumothorax is generally recognized as the most common complication of CT-PLB, with reported incidence rates ranging from 17% to 40.4% (–). In our study, which included 19 patients, only a single instance of minimal pneumothorax was documented, occurring in the PSP group where the lesion was situated subpleurally. The notably low incidence of pneumothorax in our cohort may be attributed to the solid nature of both tumor types, which likely results in minimal disruption of lung parenchyma and bronchial structures, thereby reducing the risk of pneumothorax.
Pulmonary hemorrhage is another frequent complication of CT-PLB, with reported incidences ranging from 31.38% to 69% (, ). In our study, the incidence of pulmonary hemorrhage was 73.7% (14/19), including 11 cases of minimal hemorrhage and 3 cases of moderate hemorrhage. Notably, all three moderate hemorrhage cases occurred in the APH group. This may be attributed to the small lesion sizes, which necessitated a higher number of needle passes and sampling of larger lung tissue volumes with the biopsy gun. Among the three cases of moderate hemorrhage in the APH group, one patient exhibited hemoptysis. Retrospective analysis revealed that this nodule was located in the left upper lobe, with dimensions of 2.54 cm and 2.07 cm in its long and short diameters, respectively. The hemoptysis may resulted from interference from the rib overlying the lesion, which required multiple needle adjustment during the procedure. Additionally, three biopsy cutting procedures were performed to ensure adequate tissue sampling, resulting in greater lung tissue injury. Fortunately, the hemoptysis was mild and resolved spontaneously. The biopsy pathology suggested hamartoma, consistent with the final surgical pathology. In contrast, there were no patients with moderate hemorrhage in the PSP group, and no cases of hemoptysis were observed.
This study has several limitations. First, as a retrospective study, some follow-up CT and clinical data were incomplete, leading to missing data that may introduce bias and potentially compromise the accuracy of diagnosis and the interpretation of results. Second, the relatively small sample size, coupled with the absence of data from larger, multicenter cohorts, limits the generalizability of our findings and highlights the need for future studies with larger sample sizes and broader representation.
5 Conclusion
In summary, CT-PLB plays a pivotal role in the qualitative diagnosis of APH and PSP, serving as a safe and reliable diagnostic method. This technique enables the precise and minimally invasive acquisition of pathological specimens from pulmonary nodules, thereby facilitating accurate pathological diagnosis. By overcoming the limitations of imaging-based diagnostics, CT-PLB provides clinicians with robust evidence for diagnosis and significantly contributes to the development of personalized treatment strategies.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because this is a retrospective study.
Author contributions
ML: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. YL: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. XZ: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. XW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AZ: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. HD: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JR: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Medical Science Research Project of Hebei Province(grant no. 20210837).
Conflict of interest
Author JR was employed by company GE Healthcare China.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. For writing and editing purposes.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BorghesiATironiABenvenutiMRBertagnaFDe LeonardisMCPezzottiSet al. Pulmonary hamartoma mimicking a mediastinal cyst-like lesion in a heavy smoker. Respir Med Case Rep (2018) 25:133–6. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2018.08.007
2
SiegelmanSSKhouriNFScott JrWWLeoFPHamperUMFishmanEKet al. Pulmonary hamartoma: CT findings. Radiology (1986) 160:313–7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.2.3726106
3
HochheggerBNinCSAlvesGRHochheggerDRde SouzaVVWatteGet al. Multidetector Computed Tomography Findings in Pulmonary Hamartomas: A New Fat Detection Threshold. J Thorac Imaging (2016) 31(1):11–4. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000180
4
GleesonTThiessenRHanniganAMurphyDEnglishJCMayoJR. Pulmonary hamartomas: CT pixel analysis for fat attenuation using radiologic-pathologic correlation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol (2013) 57:534–43. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12083
5
HabertPDecouxAChermatiLGibaultLThomasPVaroquauxAet al. Best imaging signs identified by radiomics could outperform the model: application to differentiating lung carcinoid tumors from atypical hamartomas. Insights Imaging (2023) 14:148. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01484-9
6
TravisWDBrambillaENicholsonAGYatabeYAustinJBeasleyMBet al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification. J Thorac Oncol (2015) 10:1243–60. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630
7
WangELinDWangYWuGYuanX. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural markers suggest different origins for cuboidal and polygonal cells in pulmonary sclerosing hemangioma. Hum Pathol (2004) 35(4):503–8. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2003.10.015
8
ZhangWCuiXWangJCuiSYangJMengJet al. The study of plain CT combined with contrast-enhanced CT-based models in predicting malignancy of solitary solid pulmonary nodules. Sci Rep (2024) 14:21871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72592-9
9
CheungYCNgSHChangJWTanCFHuangSFYuCT. Histopathological and CT features of pulmonary sclerosing haemangiomas. Clin Radiol (2003) 58:630–5. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00177-6
10
ShinSYKimMYOhSYLeeHJHongSAJangSJet al. Pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma of the lung: CT characteristics in a large series of a tertiary referral center. Medicine (Baltimore) (2015) 94:e498. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000498
11
WangQBChenYQShenJJZhangCSongBZhuXJet al. Sixteen cases of pulmonary sclerosing haemangioma: CT findings are not definitive for preoperative diagnosis. Clin Radiol (2011) 66(8):708–14. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.002
12
HungJHHsuehCLiaoCYHoSYHuangYC. Pulmonary Hilar Tumor: An Unusual Presentation of Sclerosing Hemangioma. Case Rep Med (2016) 2016:8919012. doi: 10.1155/2016/8919012
13
EsmeHDuranFMUnluY. Surgical treatment and outcome of pulmonary hamartoma: a retrospective study of 10-year experience. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2019) 35:31–5. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0728-x
14
KimSJKangHRLeeCGChoiSHKimYWLeeHWet al. Pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma and mortality risk. BMC Pulm Med (2022) 22:404. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02199-1
15
ZhangWCuiDLiuYShiKGaoXQianR. Clinical Characteristics of Malignant Pulmonary Sclerosing Pneumocytoma Based on a Study of 46 Cases Worldwide. Cancer Manag Res (2022) 14:2459–67. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S377161
16
OhnoYHatabuHTakenakaDImaiMOhbayashiCSugimuraK. Transthoracic CT-guided biopsy with multiplanar reconstruction image improves diagnostic accuracy of solitary pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol (2004) 51:160–8. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00216-X
17
YangHGaoX. The Safety of CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsy in Elderly Patients With Solitary Pulmonary Nodules. Cureus (2023) 15:e44105. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44105
18
GrigoraşAAmălineiCLovinCSGrigoraşCCPricopeDLCostinCAet al. The clinicopathological challenges of symptomatic and incidental pulmonary hamartomas diagnosis. Rom J Morphol Embryol (2022) 63:607–13. doi: 10.47162/RJME.63.4.02
19
ZhengQZhouJLiGManSLinZWangTet al. Pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma: clinical features and prognosis. World J Surg Oncol (2022) 20:140. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02603-4
20
YeSMengSBianSZhaoCYangJLeiW. Diagnosis value of (18)F-Fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in pulmonary hamartoma: a retrospective study and systematic review. BMC Med Imaging (2023) 23:2823. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-00981-z
21
ParkCMGooJM. Images in clinical medicine. "Popcorn" calcifications in a pulmonary chondroid hamartoma. N Engl J Med (2009) 360:e17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm0708685
22
HuangYDmXJirapatnakulAReevesAPFarooqiALjZet al. CT- and computer-based features of small hamartomas. Clin Imaging (2011) 35:116–22. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.02.011
23
ElsayedHAbdel HadySMElbastawisySE. Is resection necessary in biopsy-proven asymptomatic pulmonary hamartomas. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg (2015) 21(6):773–6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv266
24
ParkJSKimKShinSShimHKimHK. Surgery for Pulmonary Sclerosing Hemangioma: Lobectomy versus Limited Resection. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2011) 44:39–43. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2011.44.1.39
25
KurodaHMunMOkumuraSNakagawaK. Segmentectomy for giant pulmonary sclerosing haemangiomas with high serum KL-6 levels. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg (2012) 15(1):171–3. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs074
26
AdachiYTsutaKHiranoRTanakaJMinaminoKShimoTet al. Pulmonary sclerosing hemangioma with lymph node metastasis: A case report and literature review. Oncol Lett (2014) 7:997–1000. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.1831
27
IkedaMOkadaYHagiwaraKMurataYKanayamaTHaraAet al. A case of pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma in the hilar lesion. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2019) 67(9):818–20. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-1043-6
28
YalcinBBekciTTKozaciogluSBolukbasO. Pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma, a rare tumor of the lung. Respir Med Case Rep (2019) 26:285–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2019.02.002
29
YuanZQWangQBaoM. Symptomatic pulmonary sclerosing hemangioma: a rare case of a solitary pulmonary nodule in a woman of advanced age. J Int Med Res (2019) 300060519840898. doi: 10.1177/0300060519840898
30
YangWSunWLiQYaoYLvTZengJet al. Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-Guided Transthoracic Needle Biopsy for Solitary Pulmonary Nodules. PLoS One (2015) 10:e0131373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131373
31
HuangMDWengHHHsuSLHsuLSLinWMChenCWet al. Accuracy and complications of CT-guided pulmonary core biopsy in small nodules: a single-center experience. Cancer Imaging (2019) 19:51. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0240-6
32
LiuHYaoXXuBZhangWLeiYChenX. Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Multislice Spiral CT-Guided Transthoracic Lung Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules of Different Sizes. Comput Math Methods Med (2022) 2022:8192832. doi: 10.1155/2022/8192832
33
TipaldiMARonconiEUbaldiNBozziFSicilianoFZolovkinsAet al. Histology profiling of lung tumors: tru-cut versus full-core system for CT-guided biopsies. Radiol Med (2024) 129:566–74. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01772-4
34
TipaldiMARonconiEKrokidisMEZolovkinsAOrgeraGLaurinoFet al. Diagnostic yield of CT-guided lung biopsies: how can we limit negative sampling. Br J Radiol (2022) 95:20210434. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210434
35
ConstantinescuAStoicescuERIacobRChiraCACocoleaDMNicolaACet al. CT-Guided Transthoracic Core-Needle Biopsy of Pulmonary Nodules: Current Practices, Efficacy, and Safety Considerations. J Clin Med (2024) 13:7330. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237330
36
MaybodyMMuallemNBrownKTMoskowitzCSHsuMZenobiCLet al. Autologous Blood Patch Injection versus Hydrogel Plug in CT-guided Lung Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Radiology (2019) 290:547–54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181140
37
WoodBSwarbrickNFrostF. Diagnosis of pulmonary hamartoma by fine needle biopsy. Acta Cytol (2008) 52(4):412–7. doi: 10.1159/000325545
38
HeCZhaoLYuHLZhaoWLiDLiGDet al. Pneumothorax after percutaneous CT-guided lung nodule biopsy: a prospective, multicenter study. Quant Imaging Med Surg (2024) 14:208–18. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-891
39
SatomuraHHigashiharaHKimuraYNakamuraMTanakaKOnoYet al. Normal saline injection and rapid rollover; preventive effect on incidence of pneumothorax after CT-guided lung biopsy: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pulm Med (2024) 24:505. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03315-z
40
ZhangJAnJJingXWuJZhangXLuHet al. Assessing risk factors for complications in computer tomography-guided lung biopsy: quantitative analysis for predicting pneumothorax. Ann Saudi Med (2024) 44:228–33. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.228
41
BinghamBAHuangSYChienPLEnsorJEGuptaS. Pulmonary Hemorrhage Following Percutaneous Computed Tomography-Guided Lung Biopsy: Retrospective Review of Risk Factors, Including Aspirin Usage. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol (2020) 49:12–6. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.10.007
42
ZhuJQuYWangXJiangCMoJXiJet al. Risk factors associated with pulmonary hemorrhage and hemoptysis following percutaneous CT-guided transthoracic lung core needle biopsy: a retrospective study of 1,090 cases. Quant Imaging Med Surg (2020) 10:1008–20. doi: 10.21037/qims-19-1024
Summary
Keywords
CT-guided, percutaneous lung biopsy, atypical pulmonary hamartoma, pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma, nodule
Citation
Li M, Li Y, Zhao X, Wang X, Shi G, Zhang A, Deng H and Ren J (2025) The diagnostic value of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy in atypical pulmonary hamartoma and pulmonary sclerosing pneumocytoma. Front. Oncol. 15:1653012. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1653012
Received
24 June 2025
Revised
04 November 2025
Accepted
25 November 2025
Published
15 December 2025
Volume
15 - 2025
Edited by
Laura Curiel, University of Calgary, Canada
Reviewed by
Marcello Andrea Tipaldi, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Esra Akçiçek, Hacettepe University, Türkiye
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Li, Li, Zhao, Wang, Shi, Zhang, Deng and Ren.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiangming Wang, radiologywxm@163.com; Gaofeng Shi, gaofengs62@sina.com
† These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.