Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gynecological Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1653107

This article is part of the Research TopicOptimizing Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Efficacy Toxicity and Brachytherapy IntegrationView all 10 articles

Impact of radiotherapy on the prognosis in uterine cervical adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and retrospective cohort study

Provisionally accepted
Keyi  ZhangKeyi Zhang1Jianan  JiJianan Ji2Jing  YangJing Yang2Shulin  ZhouShulin Zhou2Qiu  JiangnanQiu Jiangnan2Chengyan  LuoChengyan Luo2*
  • 1Department of Gynecology, Fujian Medical University Affiliated Zhangzhou Hospital, Zhangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The treatment of uterine cervical adenocarcinoma (UAC) has always been a clinical challenge. The study investigated the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on survival outcomes and tumor recurrence in patients with UAC and further explored potential candidates who may benefit from RT.We systematically searched the literature on the effects of RT on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for UAC and performed a meta-analysis. The impact of RT on the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and DFS were retrospectively analyzed with the UAC cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and at our center. A total of 4382 patients from the SEER database after propensity score matching and 315 cases at our center were retrieved, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were employed to investigate the effect of RT on the prognosis. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify populations that may benefit from RT.The meta-analysis revealed that RT didn't improve DFS (OR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.34-1.52) and OS (OR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.18-1.07), in FIGO stage IB-IIA patients with UAC. The retrospective study found that RT improved CSS (HR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.9), but not DFS (HR: 2.62, 95% CI 0.96-6.8). Those with stage pT2-4, pN1, pM1, primary tumor size > 39 mm, grade III-IV, or unresected primary tumors had superior CSS when treated with RT than those without RT. In terms of DFS, the cases staged as pT1-2, pN0, pM0, with tumor > 19 mm, graded III-IV, resection of primary tumor, no parametrial involvement, and with or without lymph-vascular stromal invasion had worse outcomes after receiving RT. The UAC patients with more advanced, larger primary tumors, higher histological grade, and unresected primary tumors are likely to benefit from RT, which need to be substantiated by prospective studies.

Keywords: Uterine cervical adenocarcinoma, Radiotherapy, overall survival, Disease-Free Survival, Cancer-specific survival

Received: 24 Jun 2025; Accepted: 20 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Ji, Yang, Zhou, Jiangnan and Luo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Chengyan Luo, Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.