CASE REPORT article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gynecological Oncology
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1658448
This article is part of the Research TopicCutting-Edge Strategies in Screening, Prevention, and Treatment in Gynaecologic OncologyView all 30 articles
Preoperative Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Accessory Cavitated Uterine Malformation: A Case Series Report and Narrative Review
Provisionally accepted- Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, Changsha, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objectives: Accessory cavitated uterine malformation/mass (ACUM) is an extremely rare uterine malformation that is frequently misdiagnosed preoperatively. This study presents three ACUM cases accurately diagnosed by preoperative ultrasonography in our hospital. Through a comprehensive literature review, we systematically summarize its characteristic sonographic findings and key points for differential diagnosis, aiming to enhance sonographers' recognition of ACUM and improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnoses. Materials and Methods: We collected three ACUM cases diagnosed in our hospital from January 2023 to April 2025. Thirteen previous literature reports, including a total of 39 ACUM cases, were also reviewed. Results: The comprehensive analysis of 39 previously reported ACUM cases and three confirmed cases from our institution revealed the following: 1. The mean age of the ACUM patients was 25.9 ± 6.5 years. 2. The primary clinical presentations of ACUM consisted of dysmenorrhea (83.3%) and lower abdominal pain (47.6%), with additional findings of dyspareunia (9.5%), difficult defecation (2.4%), and primary infertility (2.4%). 3. Ultrasonographic features: 2 a) ACUM typically appeared as a thick-walled cystic mass not connected to the uterine cavity. b) The mean maximum outer diameter was 34.3 ± 11.7 mm (range 16–64 mm). c) The cyst was often surrounded by a homogeneous thick muscular layer (83.3%) and exhibited ring-like or semi-ring-like vascular signals (19.0%). d) The cystic cavity typically exhibited a ground-glass appearance (64.3%). e) Only seven cases (16.7%) displayed clearly identifiable endometrial lining on ultrasound examination. 4. Diagnostic accuracy: a) The preoperative ultrasound diagnostic concordance rate was 47.6%. b) ACUM was most frequently misdiagnosed as uterine leiomyoma (28.6%) and cystic adenomyosis (21.4%), with one case (2.4%) misdiagnosed as type II rudimentary horn uterus. Conclusion: ACUM is an exceedingly rare lesion that is particularly prone to misdiagnosis. ACUM should be considered in young female patients with severe dysmenorrhea and imaging findings of a normal uterine cavity and bilateral ovaries and a thick-walled cystic mass within the myometrium that does not communicate with the uterine cavity. Familiarity with the ultrasound manifestations of ACUM can help sonographers make timely and accurate diagnoses, assisting clinicians in choosing appropriate treatment methods and alleviating patient suffering.
Keywords: ACUM, Accessory cavitated uterine malformation, Müllerian duct anomaly, Uterine Diseases, Dysmenorrhea
Received: 02 Jul 2025; Accepted: 12 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tingting, Xingxing, Rong, Hongxia, Hong and Junhong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Duan Xingxing, duanxingxing.2007@163.com
Tian Rong, 53382519@qq.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.