REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1660937
Consensus on Managing Delayed Methotrexate Elimination in High-Dose Therapy: Insights from the Middle East
Provisionally accepted- 1National Guard, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- 2King Abdulaziz Medical City - Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- 3Kuwait Cancer Control Center, Shuwaikh, Kuwait
- 4Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
- 5Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- 6King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre - Madinah, Medina, Saudi Arabia
- 7King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 8Sultan Qaboos University, Seeb, Oman
- 9Mediclinic Middle East, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- 10NBK Children's Hospital, Ministry of health, Kuwait city, Kuwait
- 11King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
- 12King Faisal Specialized Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- 13Sultan Qaboos University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Seeb, Oman
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) therapy is a cornerstone in treating pediatric and adult cancers, namely, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and osteosarcoma, due to its capability to penetrate the blood–brain barrier. Despite its therapeutic benefits, HDMTX poses significant risks of delayed methotrexate elimination (DME) and associated toxicities such as acute kidney injury (AKI). These risks necessitate individualized dosing and preventive strategies, including hyperhydration, urine alkalinization, and leucovorin rescue. Methods To address these challenges, a modified Delphi method with two rounds was used to develop consensus statements to guide clinicians in mitigating HDMTX-associated toxicities and optimizing management strategies. A panel of 13 experts from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Kuwait, Oman, Jordan, and Egypt formulated 54 initial statements focusing on HDMTX regimens, risk factors, preventive care, and monitoring strategies. Results Consensus (≥75%) was reached on 50 statements covering HDMTX regimens, preventive care, and toxicity management. Recommendations emphasized standardized methotrexate monitoring intervals, structured risk assessment for DME and AKI, supportive care measures (hyperhydration, urine alkalinization), pharmacokinetically adjusted leucovorin rescue, and the role of glucarpidase in severe toxicity or AKI. Conclusions This consensus provides concrete clinical strategies for the safe and effective use of HDMTX, including structured risk stratification for DME, standardized monitoring intervals, pharmacokinetically guided leucovorin adjustments, and early glucarpidase intervention in patients with AKI or severe toxicity. These recommendations are particularly relevant for optimizing HDMTX administration in regions with limited access to advanced interventions.
Keywords: Acute Kidney Injury, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, delayed methotrexate elimination, glucarpidase, Hyperhydration, Leucovorin, Methotrexate, Methotrexate toxicity
Received: 07 Jul 2025; Accepted: 16 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Al Manasour, Absi, Alhuraiji, Khanani, Mheidly, Elsaid, Ballora, Al-Khabori, Al Zain, Khalifa, Rihani, Abdallah and Wali. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mubarak Al Manasour, bqpublication21@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.